ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - wolves
soccernet blog
Wolverhampton Wanderers
Posted by Daniel Pountney on 03/07/2011

All things considered, I was happy with a point against Tottenham on Sunday. And by ‘things’ of course I mean Mike Halsey.

He’s widely acknowledged as one of the league’s best referees and a top bloke. I agree, but it doesn’t mean he didn’t have an absolute stinker at Molineux and make Wolves’ chances of getting anything from the game so much more difficult.

He’s not a cheat as many were chanting and he’s not a Spurs fan as many have joked since but he did have a very bad day at the office. Had we lost that game, it would have been a disgrace. The fact that we came away with a point despite the referee’s performance showed what amazing strength of character our team has.

First of all the Alan Hutton decision. The Spurs right-back hauled down Milijas from behind when he was one-one-one with Gomes.

Here’s what FIFA say in their 2010/11 document Laws Of The Game:

A player, substitute or substituted player is sent off if he commits any of the following seven offences:

• serious foul play
• violent conduct
• spitting at an opponent or any other person
• denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goalscoring opportunity
by deliberately handling the ball (this does not apply to a goalkeeper within
his own penalty area)
• denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity to an opponent moving towards the player’s goal by an offence punishable by a free kick or a penalty kick
• using offensive, insulting or abusive language and/or gestures
• receiving a second caution in the same match

So “denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goalscoring opportunity” – yes, Milijas had a one-one-one opportunity. And “an opponent moving towards the player’s goal” – yes, he sure was. Plus “an offence punishable by a free kick or a penalty kick” – yes, he gave the penalty.

All of the conditions were satisfied – there could only be one decision. In fact, Halsey issued Hutton with a yellow card.

Here’s what the FIFA rule book says about yellow cards:
A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offences:

• unsporting behaviour
• dissent by word or action
• persistent infringement of the Laws of the Game
• delaying the restart of play
• failure to respect the required distance when play is restarted with a corner kick, free kick or throw-in
• entering or re-entering the field of play without the referee’s permission
• deliberately leaving the field of play without the referee’s permission

None of these offenses appear to relate to what happened.

As I said before, Halsey is not a cheat but this decision alone just re-enforces the perception that referees bottle decisions against the big teams. His decision not to give Gallas a second yellow card only compounded this view.

The lack of consistency in calls like this drives players, managers and fans crazy and makes the Respect campaign hard to take. Why on earth can’t we get an explanation from the referee for the decision he made?

Secondly, Richard Stearman’s disallowed goal. If anything, he was fouled by Gomes who, as we all know, is a liability when dealing with balls like the one he spilled in to his own net. This decision was clearly wrong and, if not for Fletcher’s late leveller, could have cost us dearly.
It appeared that Halsey had a good view too. But in this case, he obviously thought he had seen an infringement. The replays showed it wasn’t the case but it’s a tough call when something happens so fast.

The phantom infringement is forgivable but the Hutton decision is not. Wolves deserve an explanation for it, and the game would benefit from one too.

Just before anyone accuses me of bias here, please first look at what Harry Redknapp said after the game. Even he acknowledged that Hutton was lucky to stay on the field.
And take a look at Twitter. Use the hash tag #halsey and you will find fans from all over the county saying that both the Hutton and the Stearman decisions were wrong. Some even come from Spurs fans. I am biased of course, but it doesn’t mean I’m wrong.

Now I’m not saying that we deserved to win the match, or that we would have if Hutton had been sent off. I’m just desperate for our battle to stay in this league to be a fair one.
When you look at the results elsewhere – in particular the wins for West Ham and West Brom – you see how important this match was. Our lads showed amazing strength of character to come out of it with a point.

In the end, the draw was the right result. But the fact that we had to earn it despite the referee was just plain wrong.



Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter and Facebook

Comments

Posted by spurspad on 03/07/2011

I'm a Spurs fan and I agree that Hutton should have gone and I said that whilst at the game yesterday but the dissallowed goal would probably have been dissallowed by many a referee. Us Spurs fan have been on the wrong side of some awful referreeing decisions it doesnt make them any easier to swallow, I challenge you to point to a set of fans that doesnt think refs are inconsistent and against their team and most could point out some compelling examples (even Man U, Ashley Coles employers and L'Arse consider themselves singled out for harsh treatment from Refs. I have left many a ground and many a game scratching my head at the official's baffling decisions. I would go as far as to say it is rare that you get a decent consistent refereeing team. Remember Lino's decisions can be just as disastrous. However where would we be without these inept limelight stealing panto villains.

Posted by Andy on 03/07/2011

As a Spurs fan, I agree, Hutton should have gone. What is beyond me though is how everyone is conveniently forgetting that it should have never got to the Stearman disallowed goal - Hennessy made a crucial save when Bale was through on goal, diverted the ball about 60 degrees and Halsey gave the goal kick, from which you thumped it up the pitch and won the free kick which provided the 'goal.' Not a single media outlet is mentioning this.

Posted by Christopher on 03/07/2011

As a Spurs fan, i acknowledge that Hutton should have seen red. He was awful and possibly would have helped us if he'd gone off!

However, Halsey got the decision for Richard Stearman’s disallowed goal correct, as replays show that Stearman was focusing on Gomes, rather than the ball, so obstructing the keeper, whose two hands contacted with the ball before Stearmans shoulder struck him, was his objective.

A draw was a fair result, as had Halsey wanted to call up every decision, fouls against Modric, Lennon and repeatedly Bale would have been punished with cards, and possibly both sides would have been down to ten men.

Overall it was six of one and half a dozen of the other, and both teams got a well-deserved point.

Posted by Yiddo on 03/07/2011

Hutton should deffo have been sent off, but the disallowed goal was a very, very tough call for anyone to make.

Us fans in the Steve Bull stand thought it was a foul instantly (Maybe proved wrong when watching MOTD, but still, I can see exactly why he gave it.

It wasn't just Wolves that had the bad decisions let me remind you. We felt a few challenges in the middle were a bit on the rough side, maybe we were squeamish because of our big game against AC Milan in midweek. I'm sure that doesn't register with Wolves fans as you are a naturally tough side, but still . . . like I said, I guess we were over protective! But still, we had a clear corner not given moments before your goal etc.

Overall he had a shocker, but don't think it wasn't just the Wolves fans leaving pissed off with old Mike.

Posted by Acton_Yid on 03/07/2011

Agree with you re: Hutton, he's a liability in defence anyway. But you ARE wrong about the Stearman "goal". Multiple replays from 3 camera angles (including the one directly behind Gomes) clearly shows GOMES HAS HIS GLOVES AROUND THE BALL. This is undeniable, multiple replays show this as a fact. Therefore, the second Stearman nudges Gomes/the Ball out of the way, this is automatically a foul. Halsey was therefore correct.

Posted by Shelf side Yid on 03/07/2011

I agree Hutton should have gone if it was a sending off offence,but it wasn't Milijas never had control of the ball and Gomes was already coming off his line to intercept milijas anyway,Ie thats why Hutton never saw red,im not favouring Alan Hutton he had a shocker in other parts of the match and is not a touch on Charlie!

Posted by Italian Wolves fan on 03/07/2011

I agree Hutton should have sent off. I'm surprised he tried to defend himself. He had to be silent and go to another way thanking God he could continue the game. In every other championship he could not continue the game.
Wolves wew also unlucky!

Posted by Wolfbane on 03/08/2011

We can discuss Halsey's performance until the the sun turns green but it won't change the outcome of the game.
If someone had offered me a point against Spurs I'd have taken it. And that's what we got.
Spurs are a great team, they're not way up the table or playing AC Milan next week by accident. All told it was a fantastic spectacle for supporters on all sides and played in the manner a top flight match should be.
Good luck to Spurs in your European crusade, and your quest for 4th place.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left