ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - wolves
soccernet blog
Wolverhampton Wanderers
Posted by Daniel Pountney on 10/04/2010

Karl Henry has been pilloried in the national media for the last few weeks and we Wolves fans have all had a laugh about it. If you want a flavour of the banter, type #karlyhenrysfault in to Twitter and you will see the skipper being blamed for everything from a supporter's porridge going cold to the extinction of the dinosaurs.

He has been great for Wolves but at Wigan, he lost the plot. The 2-0 defeat in a game we really needed to win really was his fault. The awful challenge that resulted in his red card just 11 minutes in to the match was totally irresponsible and makes me think it’s time he handed over the captaincy.

What Karl brings to the side is energy, strength and the ability to disrupt the opposition in the centre of the park. The problem for him though is that Michael Mancienne and Adlene Guedioura can do all of that too.

Karl gets in to the team first though because he also brings leadership. If he fails on that front, as he did so destructively at Wigan, we have to question not only his captaincy but his place in the starting 11.


The challenge which earned Henry a red card ©PA Photos

I don’t want to hammer the skipper here – more ask whether we need a change. After all, this is a local lad who Mick plucked from Stoke’s reserves for around £100,000. He was a revelation in the Championship and stepped up a level last year, finishing as one of our best performers in the Premier League.

I still don’t believe he is a dirty player either, despite what everyone who reads the headlines but doesn’t watch the matches seems to think. Yes it was an awful challenge, yes it was a red card offence and yes it’s getting to be impossible to defend our disciplinary record. I would just urge people to look at the statistics outside of the last six games before they jump to conclusions though.

Henry’s red card at the DW Stadium was only the second of his career and he’s 27 – that is not the record of a thug. For the wider side, look at the free-kick count. The first game of the season against Stoke was 17 by Wolves and 14 against.

At Everton, we were actually out-fouled 17 to 15 and, against Newcastle, Wolves outfouled the Magpies 20 to 18. Craven Cottage was a low point - 17 by Wolves and nine by Fulham – but as we see from the other games, 17 fouls isn’t unusually high.

Wolves players just seem to get booked more often than those on other teams and you would have to ask referees why that is.

Going back to Karl and the captaincy, suspension will mean Mick McCarthy will get to see three games without him so he can use them as a gauge of how important it is to have him on the field.

It’s a shame the man we all wanted to replace him, Guedioura, is sidelined with a broken leg – something that came from a very poor challenge that the national media have hardly mentioned and we have not moaned about at all.

I expect Mancienne to do Henry’s footballing job and Jody Craddock to take over as leader of the side in the coming weeks. Bearing in mind the strength of the opposition, if the next time Karl is available for selection we have four points more than we do now, for me he would only be getting a place on the bench.

Follow this blogger on Twitter

Comments

Posted by Ben Stanwright on 10/04/2010

I don't read the headlines, but I have watched Wolves over the past year, particularly against Arsenal last year and Fulham this year. Henry is a dirty player, and Wolves are a dirty team. Not necessarily that they have any intent to injure their opponents (unless extreme recklessness is deemed to be intent), but that they have clearly incorporated persistent fouling as part of their everyday game tactics. They foul so frequently that the referee allows more marginal fouls to go unpunished. This disrupts the play of more polished teams. With respect to Henry specifically, I have never seen him show any remorse after some horrific tackles. When Shawcross injured Ramsey last year, he appeared genuinely distraught at what he had done. Henry, on most occasions, appears just to laugh. That's my definition of dirty.

Posted by Terry F on 10/05/2010

Karl Henry became a favorite at Molineux and with Mick for the same reason- dedicated, hard working, responsible and gives his all.
However, let's be straight about this, as I've been posting for quite some time, back to last year, when so many were singing his praises. He's over his head in the Premiership and is a poor choice as Captain for Wolves, and more than that, deserves to be a reserve based on his skill at controlling the ball and distributing it.
Should Mick go the defensive route with Mancienne, I fear for his position. He needs to introuce Milijas to the first team as soon as possible and take advantage of his set piece and passing skills.
I really feel for Henry, a solid player and a local lad, but OVER his head and we're suffering for it. The Wigan game was the last straw.

Posted by Aussie Adam on 10/05/2010

Shades of Emirates Stadium for me. Rash challenge that didn't really need to be there. I agree that he is not dirty but just clumsy or over zealous in his attempt to break play up. He had already been spoken to about grabbing shirts etc and it was really an unnecessary "balls n all" challenge that put us severely on the back foot. I always prefered Craddock as captain and mentioned on the last blog that Mancienne, Guedioura offer more going forward. Most importantly they don't give away rash or clumsy tackles like Henry. I also have to mention that Foley was again exposed defensively continuously allowing his opponent too much space and drifting into the middle opening up too much space. Bring back Zubar!

Posted by nullifi3d on 10/06/2010

Daniel, Daniel Daniel.... The last time i got stopped for speeding on the motorway i told the police officer that it was my 2nd time speeding in 3 years of driving. Hell, it was barely 30mph over the legal speed limit.

You know what? I still got a ticket.

Posted by JohnB on 10/07/2010

Sorry mate but Karl Henry represents everything that's wrong with the English game. Lots of commitmment, little technical skill. He would have been banished 3 games ago for what he did to Joey Barton in any other league in Europe, but here they waited until after he had broken the leg of one player and nearly ended the career of another before they even game him a red card!?!

Posted by Aussie Adam on 10/14/2010

Ben I disagree that Karl is a dirty player, he is simply out of his depth in the role that Mcarthy has asked him to play. Mancienne and Guedioura play the same role but are faster, read the play better and make better use of the ball going the other way. Many players from almost any team anywhere use fouls as a tactic to stall the flow of their opposition (although not all of them go in sliding with both feet its reckless not dirty)I never really rated Karl to be honest and hope that in the coming matches Mcarthy can spot that there are better options at his disposal

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left