ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - West Ham United
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
Soccernet  Home Correspondents Home
RSS feed
West Ham United
Posted by Billy Blagg on 11/08/2009

One step forward, two steps back; there is no denying this was a desperately disappointing result against a side that always seem to do us at home. That's bad enough, but, like last season, the result was a travesty as the Hammers deserved something from a game they dominated for long periods. Everton's goals came against the run of play and picking the ball from the net seemed to be the only thing Rob Green had to do all afternoon.

But, we lost and undid the good work of mid-week, been dumped back into the trouble zone and also, once gain, surely given the fragile confidence a knock. So what went wrong?

Well, I've been defending Gianfranco Zola this season but questions need to be asked about his team selection here. It was desperately embarrassing watching the MOTD2 team purring like my cat Morrissey when he jumps onto my bed at night, over the skills of Allesandro Diamanti - a man whose posterior was warming the bench for almost an hour. Diamanti wasn't thought worth a place in the mid-week win over Villa either and it's just difficult to see why he isn't starting.

On the other hand, Mark Noble hasn't looked up to pace all season but had his best game for the Irons in their mid-week victory and his reward is to be dropped to the bench in place of Jiminez, a man who looks like he is going to be one of those people who spends so long adjusting to the pace of the Premiership that his presence may end up with him plying his trade in the Championship instead. If the Chilean made any telling contribution at all before he was replaced by the sparkling Italian then I simply didn't see it.

The loss of Carlton Cole was keenly felt - but then isn't this what has worried every West Ham fan since the start of the season? - but Hines and Franco looked likely to break the deadlock early on and were certainly worth a goal or two between them after the Hammers had pulled the game back to 2-1. Most Hammers fans were concerned at the lack of strike options up front but I'd have to say we look in better shape than last season as Franco looks a decent squad addition.

Everton's goal had come against the run of play and the only thing you can say about it was that it was at least inevitable considering the way recent results have gone at Upton Park against the Toffee's. It was Cahill who held the ball up for Saha to strike home sweetly in the 26th minute past a bemused Green who never even moved. The only comment I would make is that it shows that top class goal-scoring can win matches on its own. Everton did seem to take confidence from the lead and pushed the Hammers back for a while and Saha went close with a header from the corner as the Boleyn Ground became hushed.

After the break though, the home side came more into the game although it was a little odd to understand why the half-time substitution was of the hard-working Collison; Stanislas coming on in what seemed to be some tactical ploy. I'll admit I couldn't see what the tactic was - feel free to write and tell me, I'm always willing to learn - but there is no doubt the pressure increased as did the noise of the crowd. West Ham's sickening reward for their enterprise was to go two goals behind five minutes after the introduction of Diamanti, Dan Gosling drilling home on 64 minutes after Green blocked his original shot and Spector had gone sprawling in attempting to tackle back.

But there was barely time to consider if the Hammers could hit back when they actually had. Diamanti's pass was picked up by Stanislas whose clip past the keeper didn't appear to be strong enough before Everton's Hibbert decided to clear it into his own net rather than over the bar. It was no more than the Hammers deserved and they then set about trying to get something late on from the match as they had against Arsenal and Aston Villa in their last two games.

Diamanti was in sparkling form and came close with a free kick - he's worth his place alone for the number of kicks he gets on target - when Howard saved superbly. Hines went close on several occasions and a number of attacks were scrambled away as the crowd roared the Hammers on. This time though, it wasn't enough and the loss of at least a point ensured the Hammers would be looking at an uncomfortable table during the international break.

On such things can seasons turn; a result today would have meant an unbeaten run of four matches, a mid(ish) table place and a confidence building two weeks leading up to what could be crucial games against Hull and Burnley but it wasn't to be and those games are now starting to look vital. Diamanti must surely start those games now, it's not recorded what the Italian thinks about being left out of the starting line-up but it must be frustrating for the player and he must surely ask what it is he isn't doing that makes the manager not pick him. It smacks of something odd; after all, Zola wanted the player and paid a lot of money for him - allegedly it was why he had to sell Collins - and every time the Italian has played he has looked dangerous, so why is he being left out? Is it to accommodate Zola's diamond formation that never works for us while the 4-4-2 does?

He has his critics but the fans haven't turned on Zola yet but rest assured, strange decisions that cause us to lose again at home are now concerning many. You've got a free week Gianfranco, sit down and talk it over with Steve Clarke and get it sorted....err quickly!

Comments

Posted by Jay on 11/09/2009

Ridiculous is the best way to describe Zola's logic in not starting Diamanti, the only reason I can see not to start him is that he hasn't scored from anywhere but the PK spot, but the thing about "The Diamond Boy" is when he delivers a free kick it is on target and if the keeper does knock it back into play someone can usually latch onto it.

Zola's only excuse is that Diamanti hasn't adapted to "Premiership Football" yet, but he is better then Jimenez.

I would hate to see Zola go because he is such a classy manager, and obviously has a great potential in inspiring players, but his choices do seem a bit off as of late.

Posted by Paul P on 11/09/2009

Hi Blagg,
Well as you have probably read now collison came off injured. He was down as doubt on wednesday so two matches probably too much. Also diamanti: zola says on the BBC interview (the longer one on the website) he knows he makes an impact as sub so that why he uses him that way(sic). However i agree with you that makes no sense when you an ineffective player on the pitch. Also one of the other websites claims it because we reverted to 433 rather than the more sucessful (with us under zola) 442. As i wasn't at this one (only saw the Beebs highlights) i can't comment on this. However yes Zola needs to get it sorted and quick. Sounds promising with Cole likely to be back, however Hull are much better with bullard so could be a hard game, but a big one. Who though we would be saying that about Hull?

Paul

Posted by Homeabroad on 11/10/2009

My question is: when do we start wondering if higher forces are involved? Paris H claims to have hexed Ronaldo, and that seems to be working nicely, so did someone in Sheffield do the same to the Hammers? Ever since Tevez left there have been endless fines, changes of owners, injury crises (poor Dean the latest and worst hit in a long line), general financial upheaval and last-thing-we-needed transfer exits (Bellamy and Collins being the most crucial examples). And now, as you say, what we've all been dreading has happened - Cole's out, and let's hope he's properly cured by the time he returns to the pitch, or we are in even deeper do. What we need is an anti-curse to get rid of the one I'm guessing was sent down from Yorkshire. Do you know any West Ham-supporting wizards or mystics who could do the job?

Blagg says: what a coincidence! I am currently researching this very subject. The West Ham 'curse' has been in place long before Sheffield stuck their blade in and I'm sure I once read an article that the Boleyn Ground had been cursed by a Gypsy way back when. I asked about this on another website last week and Apes, Ivories and Peacocks for anyone who has heard about this / read it or seen it with their own eyes (probably the last is a little unlikely) and can let me known more details. If you know of it please email me at billyblagg@hotmail.com

Posted by John on 11/10/2009

How I agree with everything you have said my heart bleeds everytime i watch the hammers lately to se them play so well and to 1 down hurts bad BUT we are I think playing so much better than at the start of the season where we didnt look interested didnt do the 1 percenters that win games . I really do think we are 1 striker away from a quality team please please Zola find a goal poacher to go with the strenght of Cole .The next 2 games i think will shape our year 2 wins and we are on our way .

Posted by Tom Jeffcote on 11/16/2009

The "curse" goes back to when that new stand was built-the selling of a great generation of players, relegation with a top team of players, losing the Cup Final on penalties for example. I reckon their is a dead Chinaman buried under that stand and until we knock it down, find him and give him a decent burial then it will always continue.

Blagg: As I never tire of saying, if you think West Ham's woes began when the Rio Stand was built then you are either young, have a short memory or don't support West Ham. My Granddad used to claim there was a curse back in the '50's!

Posted by tom Jeffcote on 11/17/2009

Well, Billy, I'm 68 and do support West Ham so it must be the short memory. I saw my first match in November 1952 (against Sheffield United of all teams 1-1 draw) and was a fan from there on. Probably stood alongside your Granddad during games in the fifties but never felt that there was some external evil force at work until more recent times. Dig him up!

Blagg says: Dig up my Granddad? I'm not sure I'd go that far to help out the Hammers....
Seriously Tom, you've been going since '52 and can't recount evil forces in the '60's and '70's?

Posted by tom jeffcote on 11/18/2009

Ah, Billy your incicive questioning has discovered a fatal flaw in my argument. Not the fifties where we moved up from a Second to the First Division, nor the sixties where we won the World Cup (being there was one of life's highlights) as well as The Cup Winner's Cup and the Fa Cup but here I must reveal that I migrated to Australia in 1968 so the seventies were, apart from a few visits to the ground on a visit home in 1975 largely unknown territory as regards evil spirits. Since the 80.s I have returned many times and always to see the Hammers when playing at home or the youth team at Little Heath (I am in danger of getting carried away here -sorry)but it was until we sold Rio(watched Anton play at Chadwell Heath as a very young player-sorry I'm off again)and built that stand that things seemed to change and we get to a point now where we owe serious money to a team that we have since been found not guilty of committing any offences against.So Billy if it was the 70's I missed it.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Billy Blagg Born at an early age a mere defenders spit from the Boleyn ground, Billy Blagg has seen every West Ham game from 1898 onwards. Blagg was mentioned by Kenneth Wolstenholme in 1966 as one of the people on the pitch during the famous Hammers win over West Germany that lifted the World Cup and he returned to the pitch again for the 1975 FA Cup Final but stayed on the terrace for 1980 FA Cup victory. Blagg, 26, now lives with his eighth wife and innumerable children in a small semi-detached with chintz curtains in Dagenham, Essex and still attends every Hammers match and training session.
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN