I can't help but feel that West Ham are trying to fulfill a self-perpetrating prophecy here. A few weeks back, with less matches played than their rivals and only two home games, one against local rivals who've got a bit of a sign on us currently and Liverpool, who we've not beaten since referees last wore top hats, we find ourselves in the lower reaches of the division. "Woe is us - it's relegation" scream the knee-jerkers and, all of a sudden, we start playing like a relegation haunted team; Confidence drains away and top players - not the ones usually open to fans criticism - suddenly start looking second rate. Saturday's game was a case in point.
It was 1-1 after an early penalty was converted by James Beattie for a quite appalling - appalling as in clumsy not malicious - tackle by Julien Faubert (Zola pleast note: This man is not a full-back) on former Iron Matthew Etherington and West Ham had struck back with an unmarked header by Matthew Upson from a Mark Noble corner. It was the second half and the Hammers were applying all the pressure and looking the most likely when Fuller, again, skinned the man many are saying should be England's first choice cente-half and centred for Beattie to again outwit Faubert - or perhaps outmuscle might be a better description - to put Stoke 2-1 up.
This after England's possible Word Cup keeper Robert Green, had managed to kick a ball only five yards and barely in front of Beattie again, in the first half. OK late on, Robert Huth should have been sent off for a deliberate and nasty elbow to Upson but, chasing the game, the Hammers looked panicky and short of ideas and Stoke could well have gone further ahead when Etherington again had a good chance after 76 minutes.
A terrible irony here as, sitting in the Correspondent office in Blagg Acres (?!) , I can see the 2009 West Ham calendar on which October's man - one Matthew Etherington - skips across the grass wearing claret and blue. Of course, the knee-jerkers will say 'we should never have sold him; he gave us width we now don't have' (they are probably right) but these were the same people who last season wanted him out as he wasn't 'consistent enough'. It's a strange world.
My over-riding feeling is that it is still too early to start waving hands in the air. There are signs that the rythym in play is still there and even Tony Pullis said after the game that he expects West Ham to pull away with 'the players they have' so we just have to keep believing and working on things that matter. However, if there is a free agent full back we can pick up then it would help and, if Franco can play for Mexico surely he should be turning out for West Ham now?
It looks bad currently but a few wins can turn it round and there is no reason to see why we can't get them against the better sides as those who we expect to be battling in Premier Division 2.
Comments
 |
Posted by Canadian Hammer on 10/19/2009
I've gotta say it is looking worrying that the only striker we have is being marked out of the game. To have Carlton Cole racing around on his own up front trying to bulldoze his way through Stoke's rearguard and obviously getting increasingly frustrated is not a good sign. A red-card is not long in coming. No support in attack until the last 10 - 15 mins of the game is terrible management. And if the likes of Stoke are gonna beat us, what hope do we have when the arse an all show up for a game.
 |
Posted by Jon Deprudhoe on 10/21/2009
I'm a Chelsea fan with a soft spot for West Ham, courtesy of Bobby Moore, Billy Bonds, and Trevor Brooking back in the day. And more recently Frank Lampard, Joe Cole, and Glen Johnson. In my slightly-biased view, I think you have an excellent manager in Zola (a future Chelsea manager). I've really enjoyed watching him integrate exciting young talent like Tomkins, Stanislas and Hines in to a team with Scott Parker and Carlton Cole. From what I've seen this season, The Hammers should be above teams like Burnley and Wigan but they just aren't bagging the points. In my lifetime, West Ham has had this tendency to play beautiful football.... And get relegated. If that happens, no worries, they'll bounce back because their football is too good. But let's hope it doesn't happen because Zola is really on to something. Half his team hasn't been paid very much but potential new owners should set that straight soon. Diamanti sparkles, too. Survival for now, inspiral revival coming soon.
 |
Posted by marius on 10/21/2009
Etherington is not the issue at all. The fact that we conceded 2 is the problem. I recall us winning many of our matches 1-0 last year. Our defense in general last year was top 6-7 if I recall correctly.
Quite simply whoever condoned the sale of Collins is the culprit. A moronic sale.
 |
Posted by Borne Wizautname on 10/21/2009
Love the blog. Been reading for a while now but this is the first time I've commented. Anyhow... couldn't agree with you more. The knee-jerking has got to stop. Yeah it's frustrating to lose, especially when we should be winning, but given the style of play and the flow of the matches I'd say that the wins will come soon enough. West Ham is showing a lot of potential with some great passing and nice flow down the pitch, but the results still aren't there. It takes time to implement a system as complicated as this though. Patience, patience...
Posted by Salisu on 10/21/2009
The Hammers seem as if they'd not let Zola go until it is too late.
Blagg: Errrr...eh?
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|