|
|
 |
|
The problem with making any sort of definitive pronouncement is that you can find yourself having to stand by it, come what may. Daniel Levy was certainly brave in stating that Luka Modric was not for sale at any price but since then the player has upped the ante, to the extent that he has reportedly submitted a transfer request.
While that may not change anything in the chairman's mind, there is no doubt that trying to hold on to someone who is so clearly convinced that his future lies away from White Hart Lane presents all sorts of problems.
In angling for his move, Modric does not appear, in the circumstances, to have lost his sense of decorum: no Darren Bent-style twittering for him. In the midst of all the speculation swirling around, he has variously been described as "the nicest boy you could meet" (Harry Redknapp), "a very, very good professional" (Joe Jordan), and "as good as gold" (Kevin Bond). This is hardly a surprise, since he has always come across as an intelligent and good-natured individual.
There was a period last season when Modric (and indeed other members of Tottenham's Croatian contingent) appeared to be the recurring presence at charitable events supported by the club, and his conduct in general appears to have been impeccable both on and off the field. If he is, however, determined to go, then Daniel Levy may find that he has backed both himself and the player into a corner. There is already more than a hint of the unpleasantness that may be to come following the "clear the air" meeting between the two. In addition to claiming that some sort of "gentlemen's agreement" had been breached, Modric went on to say that,
"A lot has been published in the press about the meeting with Levy, who gave the public a twisted account of what happened. I must say that I am genuinely disappointed about what Levy said to me. He didn't care about what I was telling him. It all only convinced me further that I was right to consider moving on to another club … He threatened me - he said if I didn't accept the club's stance, they would make me sit on the bench or in the stands"
While not exactly burning any bridges, it's clear that Modric is at least getting out his matchbox. No doubt the saga still has some way to run.
The anxiety over Modric has been compounded by the news that the other outstanding Spurs player in the latter half of last season is now going to be out of commission for the start of the next. Sandro picked up his knee injury at the Copa America and his presence in midfield will be sorely missed. Spurs have been linked with a player who could more than adequately fill Sandro's shoes, but Redknapp is reportedly balking at the amount of money needed to acquire the services of Scott Parker. But who knows, perhaps the manager will have £30m plus to spend before the summer is out.
type="text/javascript">
Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter
Comments
 |
Posted by Ow Kah Leong on 07/20/2011
While I'm sad that Spurs will be losing a thoroughly professional player both on and off the field, it makes no sense to keep a player that has made up his mind to leave. Having said that, Levy would certainly be squeezing out the maximum fee that he could from Chelsea. Much like Berbatov. However we have not seen any ready replacement being linked - besides Parker. So what now?
How about centre-back and forwards? How about the dead wood? Bentley, Jenas, etc still around. Time is running short now.....
 |
Posted by Peter on 07/20/2011
Modric is going nowhere. If there is a chairman in the league who can stand on his promise not to sell and show the league that the teams still have power over the players under contract, it's Daniel Levy. He will not back down and Modric will be in a Spurs shirt come September 1.
 |
Posted by cuachin on 07/21/2011
Don't look like Harry R will be doing much business in the transfer market. DeFoe, Jenas etc all still around??
Actually if one looks at depth Spurs have some pretty good fellows who are under utilised. Dos Santos, Krancjar, Pavylecahnko et al. Sometimes one gets the feeling Harry is not bringing out the best in some players who do well in their own country teams in Internationals. Must make one wonder. If Modric has to go, Modric has to go. There are always others just as good or better. Really it all depends on how the Manager and his team work to brng out the best in the players they have. Wonder what happen to the interest in Scot Parker??
 |
Posted by JP on 07/21/2011
I'm a huge fan of Sandro, so this is tough news for the club. In fact, I'd like to see Spurs play a 4-2-3-1 with Sandro and Palacios or Sandro and Huddlestone in defensive midfield and Bale, Rafa, and Lennon in attacking midfield supporting Defoe (or Adebayor) if they can get him.
I agree that Harry doesn't always seem to get the best out of some of the younger guys. I like Kaboul alot but he doesn't play enough in my opinion. What about Kyle Walker...in my opinion he should be their starting right back next year. In fact, if you're dissatisfied with Hutton and Benoit you could start Walker and Kyle Naughton at the LB and RB respectively. They have to get younger in defense. I love Ledley but he's becoming a liability now.
On another note, I'm planning to start my own football blog called The Beautiful Game. If there are any interested in writing for the blog, please send me an email to the above address. Thank you.
 |
Posted by Mitko on 07/22/2011
Actually on the left defense position Spurs can play Danny Rose
 |
Posted by GB3 on 07/22/2011
(modric) "is not for sale at any price." that statement is why spurs are in this mess. everyone/everything has a price. mod's very public desires to jump ship has made this a pissin' contest. harry warned about letting talent go because it suggests the club is not "ambitious" and therefore could never attract the quality players needed to consistently challenge for cl. i agree, but i am far more concerned about the message sent by essentially holding luka, with threats of rotting on the bench. hey levy, cut off nose/spite face. like a bafoon. young talent will be hesitant to sign long term deals, and established players will think twice before they transfer in. it's bad business, poor managing, it's just foolish. put a 33mill tag on luka and let him go, then get a danm striker! gb3, vdv, lennon, sandro, hudd, pienaar are as good a middle unit as any. and let niko go play first team somewhere for god's sake, take anything for wilson and the jermaines. n try a pav/gdsantos front.
 |
Posted by MpShea on 07/22/2011
Although seeing our best on ball midfielder let go to our hated rival would be devastating to some, if we can get over 30 million for Luka I think its time for him to be granted his transfer. As much as I love 'arry and Levy, unless we finish top 3 this year, Bale will be gone by next summer. We might as well sell and invest in younger players to grow for future seasons. My ultimate dream would be If Tevez goes to Inter, and both Mancs fail to sign Schneider, i could see him being a replacement for Luka if he does indeed get dealt.
 |
Posted by Ben on 07/25/2011
I dont understand the whole 'cant keep a player that wants to leave' attitude. So what if the player wants to leave. He signed a six year contract, he is a professional, he stays. You cannot tell me he is going to spit the dummy and sulk for the next five years. make it clear he is staying and get on with it, he will soon get over it.
Posted by chipplejay on 07/30/2011
I think Levy is totally out of order to play "hard ball" with Modric, like this. The "big stick" approach has never worked and never will - if you're going to insist on him staying then we need to make him want to stay.
It seems he is uncertain, unlike Berbatov with whom it was just a matter of "when".
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|
|
|
|
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|