ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Sunderland
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
Soccernet  Home Correspondents Home
RSS feed
Sunderland
Posted by Paul Allen on 10/05/2009

It's not often that you come away from Old Trafford disappointed with a point. Sunderland's 2-2 draw against Manchester United could and should have been a well deserved victory.

However, one man's disappointed at the late equalizer only increased when Fabio Capello named his England squad for the final two World Cup qualifiers.

Darren Bent, who scored his 7th Premier League goal of the season on Saturday, must surely be questioning what he has to do to get back in the England setup.

A lot of teams park the proverbial bus when they travel to Old Trafford. We've done this the last few visits and it has been effective - a last-minute Vidic goal resulted in a 1-0 defeat last season. Despite a lot of criticism for teams who do this, I think it's the only way some teams can get a point away from home against the 'big four'.

So, I was quite surprised but also impressed with Steve Bruce's decision to play 4-4-2 and attack a Man Utd team that doesn't seem so intimidating without Cristiano Ronaldo.

It couldn't have started any better for Sunderland when, in the seventh minute, Darren Bent found the bottom corner with a drive from the edge of the box. The expected onslaught didn't happen and Sunderland looked more than comfortable with their lead going into half-time.

Dimitar Berbatov's magnificent equalizer early in the second half and I, once again, expected Man Utd to take control of the game and go on to win it comfortably.

Sunderland didn't read the script and continued to put pressure on Man Utd. Andy Reid, who's been a revelation since getting in shape, played a tantalizing ball into the box. Kenwyne Jones leaped above the out of form Ben Foster and Sunderland took the lead once more.

With five minutes to go Kieran Richardson was sent off for kicking the ball away. He was stupid to do such a thing but I thought it was harsh. The adjudged free-kick was debatable and he did kick the ball back to where the foul occurred. However, he shouldn't have done it. If he hadn't have been sent off then we may have been able to hang on for the win.

Going into the 90th minute with a 2-1 lead, I thought we'd hold on for a famous win. However, Man Utd have a knack off scoring late goals. Patrice Evra's shot was going well wide until Anton Ferdinand's attempted block deflected into his own net.

Ferdinand's future at the club has been in question with a swap deal with Spurs' Alan Hutton very close in the last transfer window and rumours of it being reignited in January. I've been disappointed with his performances this season, however, he was solid at the back and can take confidence from his performance on Saturday.

Once Man Utd equalized for the second time they bombarded the Sunderland goal. We hung on for the draw in the end, something that annoyed Sir Alex Ferguson.

Ferguson was fuming at the four minutes of added time, claiming that it should have been more and that the referee was poor. I thought the referee favoured Man Utd, if anyone, but I am glad he didn't play any longer as there was only one team going to score once it was 2-2. We all know what happens when you keep playing until the next team scores at Old Trafford - just ask Man City fans.

I'd have taken a draw before the game but once the final whistle had blown I felt disappointed. A good sign that Sunderland are going places and we can go into our next match against Liverpool full of confidence.

Our record against the 'big four' is abysmal (2 points from the last two seasons) so I'd like to think that Bruce can change that defeatist mentality.

There was one manager who should've been pleased with the game - Fabio Capello. There was an English striker on the pitch who’s been brilliant all season. No, not Wayne Rooney but Darren Bent.

Bent hit his seventh goal of the season (possibly eight if the Premier League panel give him the fifth against Wolves) and has shown tremendous finishing and composure in front of goal.

Despite being the top English striker this season and one of the highest scorers of the Premier League in the last four seasons, he wasn't included in Capello's latest squad. Capello has stated on numerous occasions that he'll pick players on form - Michael Owen's exclusion is proof of that. Bent's form should justify his inclusion in the squad. So, why has he been overlooked?

Capello has included Aston Villa's Gabriel Agbonlahor on the basis of his goalscoring form alongside the regulars Rooney and Emile Heskey. Spurs' Peter Crouch and West Ham's Carlton Cole make up the England frontline.

Would Bent have been called up if he'd been in such a rich vein of form for his former club, Spurs? He was last called up by Capello after going through a goalscoring patch similar to his current one, so possibly.

However, I think Capello wants to show faith in the players that have got England to South Africa. He had one space to fill once Jermaine Defoe was ruled out through injury and decided to add Agbonlahor to the squad, ahead of Bent.

Although I'm sure Bent is disappointed I do think that he isn't far from an international call-up. If he keeps scoring then Capello can't ignore him for long.

The last Sunderland striker to get in the England squad was Kevin Phillips, who was given a warm welcome on his return to the Stadium of Light in the League Cup last week. If Bent can make a similar impression to Phillips' stint on Wearside then I'm sure it won't be long before he finds himself in an England squad.

Comments

Posted by John on 10/06/2009

I am not sure how Darren Bent can be "one of the highest scorers of the Premier League in the last four seasons". He wasn't even a regular with the Spurs team. He needs to do more over a longer period of time.

Having said that - Heskey and Carlton Cole haven't really done well this season so it shouldn't be long before Bent gets his chance. This would be more because the other strikers that England have aren't really world class.

Besides Rooney, there are 3 - 4 slots open for Walcott, Agbonlahor, Defoe, Owen (smaller faster forwards although Owen may no longer qualify) and Heskey, Crouch, Bent (bigger target men) and Cole (somewhere in between) for the world cup.

Posted by samoski on 10/06/2009

capelo is right not to pick bent. he is not yet ripe for the national team. calton cole is better as he is a more aggressive player. it is not enough to be a top scorer in a 'sunderland'. ask, if he was that good, why is he not playing in the top teams?
when he is good enough to be picked, am sure capello will, for now he is not

Posted by muhammed colley on 10/06/2009

bent is a good player and he can be the top strike apart from rooney ,he could be a first choice in england team

Posted by Steven Wisniewski on 10/06/2009

Completely agree with you Paul. Unfortunately Capello is passing up a chance to get Bent acquainted with the squad, because we all know that with his continued performance he will be in the squad come Summer 2010. With international duty comes rest for the Sunderland squad, although I am not sure whether this is a good thing or bad seeing as our next opponent hasn't been in 'rich' form recently. I would rather face them as they played against Chelsea and so soon coming off a great performance at Trafford rather than wait 2 weeks and start fresh. Hopefully Bent will keep a chip on his shoulder and Reid/Cattermole/Cana/Steed get healthier/more fit over the next two weeks. Here's to hoping for a first win against the 'Big Four'!!

Posted by james murphy on 10/06/2009

While not a fan of Heskey, I can understand the argument of his inclusion in the England squad - he somehow causes those around him to score goals. I can understand the inclusion of Crouch even with his average goal scoring record for club and QUALITY international teams. But leaving the most inform English striker out, especially we've already qualified, is ridiculous.

Good blog!

Posted by Paul on 10/07/2009

Bent should've gotten a call-up to the English team. As a Man. Utd fan, I was disappointed in the way our defence played him, but as a fan of football, he and Jones have been playing spirited football. (As Steve Bruce is a Man Utd. man, it is none too surprising)

While, I think Gabby can add to a team, that lacks a bit of youth and pace, Carlton Cole and Emile Heskey are not the strikers you want to bring to a World Cup with you. My thoughts are that if a player is not playing consistently for club, he should not play for country (with some exceptions; last year Tevez for example). This would remove Emile Heskey from the equation as he is third choice striker at Villa.

I'm sure Capello will re-think his decision and that Bent will be going to the WC. In fact, I think these slights will only serve to increase that already large chip on his shoulder. I only hope it doesn't come against my beloved Utd.

Posted by Anonymous on 10/07/2009

Mn U rocks.And all haters should realise something. That so long as you wear the man u jersey you are one of the top players and with the added experience we can knock in those late winners any time.whether in the last or 97th min. we´ll bury them.A match lasts till the final whistle goes.So haters put your pride aside and call a spade a spade!

Posted by Matt H on 10/07/2009

Whats standing in the way of Bent getting a call up is the fact that all of the on form strikers in the squad are in the same category football wise as Bent. Agbonlahor, Defoe, and Cole are all crisp finishers with great pace and all are similar in style to Bent. However they have more international experience, especially experience with THIS England squad. Capello is looking for some continuity in his squad, and although I don't agree, he might see the inclusion of Bent as an unnecessary risk to take when his team is in the form it is. What England really needs is a powerful striker to step up, because no doubt Darren is better right now than both Heskey and Crouch but he does not possess the same skills to be able to hold the ball or win headers to set up the speedy strikers. A role that Kenwyne Jones plays for Bent.

Posted by klauq on 10/07/2009

yeah i think it's a bizarre decision to leave Bent out of England squad, it selections are based on recent form. I am a MU fan, but i find Bent is an outstanding striker, and right now Darrent Bent is the best England striker. Bent is right now slightly better than even Rooney, so to select Agbonlahor before Bent is...bizarre..

Posted by Mcma on 10/08/2009

Capello has only 1 choice for the forward, Rooney. So Capellob priority is to look for a person playing alongside Rooney. Heskey is obviously the best, Crouch the 2nd. Cole a question mark - he plays upfront alone in WestHam shirt, but Capello thinks he could be good partner of Rooney, so needs further nurture. Defoe/Agbonlahor/Bent are treated as an emergency cover for Rooney, rather than his partner. Does Capello need 3 covers for Rooney? Defoe is the best among these 3, so Bent is competing with Agbonlahor. Last but not least, Owen still has a chance, coz he has the same function as Beckham - they have the quality to give you a goal. Most importantly, the opponent also feels the same! I mean, when you throw Beckham or Owen in the final stage of a match, the opponent will at least feel more scary than you throw Darren Bent in. For me, that's an important element - the confidence and belief during a match . Thus, I can't see much chance that Bent could make the squad, even Agbonlahor

Posted by Rob on 10/08/2009

The answer as to whether Darren Bent is good enough is in the bottom left hand corner of the ESPN start page.

No Of Goals scored and in that section is a chance to select No Of Shots made.

Both Torres and Rooney have had well above 40 shots. Bent has had maybe less than 20 (Sunderland do not get many shots per game). Yet he has scored more than Rooney and would have scored more than Torres has he took the penalty and been awarded the goal that deflected.

He is ignored by England as he plays for a North East club just as Malcolm Macdonald was at his peak.

Far better than Rooney for sure. Rooney used to be good, but is not playing as he used to... He will end up like Owen... 'A Spent Force' if he does not pick up soon.

Posted by daveyg on 10/09/2009

Good post Paul
John your knowledge is pretty mimimal if you think Cole is not in form.4 Goals,two of which goal of the month candidates on MOTD. Heskey I'm sure will not last the course and Cole is the likely benefactor.Although I'm not a total fan yet, if he carries on like he has over the last 12 months the he can offer what Heskey can't. I feel that Bent or Crouch will be the benefactor if Heskey doesn't go at all,Bent more favourable due to his pace,though Crouch does seem to frighten many international defences and has a good record at international level.Tough call and Bent may have it in the end due to playing more games.I'm hoping that Heskey doesn't make the plane as by next summer he'll even slower.

Posted by Dnasty on 10/10/2009

Rob,

The goals per game argument is a stellar one, and if football matches were as simple as picking your fantasy league team, then you'd certainly be managing England. The point is that while Darren Bent has been precise, England a) is already performing well, and b) there are certain aspects of Heskey's game that can't be boiled down to stats on a piece of paper.

To say Rooney USED to be good is astonishing, given this is the best form of his career. Bent should definitely be in the squad, but there is no reason to argue that a well-performing new player should push out two trusted and well-performing starters. If it ain't broke...

Posted by JONATHAN on 10/10/2009

BENT IS NOT YET A WORLD CLASS STRIKER ALTHOUGH HE HAS HIT FORM AT THE RIGHT TIME.HE WILL GET HIS CHANCE EVENTUALLY BASING ON HIS NEXT PERFORMANCES.CAPELLO IS A MAN WHO IS HARD TO UNDERSTAND BUT WHEN HE TAKES A GAMBLE I AM SURE IT WILL WORKOUT EVENTUALLY.

Posted by Naveen Vikraman on 10/10/2009

Rooney vs Bent?

I think Rooney's in there for the various dimensions he brings the the game. He doesn't just score, but helps with the other aspects like as defending and plays with plenty of heart when the team's down. So in that sense, I do think he's doing better then Bent.

Being an Man Utd fan, and watching how Bent gave our center backs hell of a torrid time just underlined his quality. I was really surprised he didn't make it in the Three Lions squad this time.

Capello seems to include players for various purposes though, Heskey for his ball-holding, Crouch for the aerial threat. I guess its just plain unlucky that Bent has a style similar to Gabby.

Why Gabby? Best leave that to Fab Cap to explain eh?

Posted by peter clarke on 10/13/2009

how can darren bent be beteer than wayne rooney? wayne rooney has better stamina and power and the will to win even if they are losing by 2 goals. i don't think darren bent has such an attitude. Capello should let darren bent have a try out in the squad but most likely he will disappoint. Playing for club and country is a total different feeling.

Posted by bernie` on 10/13/2009

"I am not sure how Darren Bent can be "one of the highest scorers of the Premier League in the last four seasons". He wasn't even a regular with the Spurs team. He needs to do more over a longer period of time."

What more can he do? like you said he couldnt get a game at spurs and he has still rattled in a stack of goals. so i think a bloke who has scored a fair few premier league goals off limited chances in the last few years doesnt need to do more over a longer period of time. i think now that he is getting a start teams had better watch out. bent should definitely be in the england squad.

Posted by Steven on 10/16/2009

Wow Rob,

what you've written has demonstrated your lack of understanding of the game.

Here's the difference. Liverpool and Manchester United are top four clubs. Half the time teams park a bus in front of the goal when playing against these teams. For Rooney and Torres to get goals, they take that many shots simply because they are BETTER at creating chances than Darren Bent. If Rooney and Torres have well over 40 shots so far, how much more likely is Liverpool or Manchester United going to score relative to Sunderland? These two strikers aren't just predators who lurk around. They are the playmakers for their respective teams.

Very disappointing that you would dare to say that Darren Bent is "far better than Rooney". I'm sorry but where was Darren Bent when England went to their last few tournaments. Rooney's not a "spent force" either. He's top scorer of the qualifiers. Something tells me you simply don't like Wayne Rooney. But fact is, he's class. Darren Bent isn't.

Posted by ANDY on 10/17/2009

BENT IS ONE UNLIKE DUDE.LAST SEASON HE WAS HOSPURS TOP SCORER BUT HE WASN'T APPREACIATED AND NOW HE IS AT SUNDERLAND DOING GREAT AND HE IS NOT CALLED TO THE SQUAD.MAY BE THE MANAGER CAN SEE WHAT WE DO NOT SEE IN HIM.

Posted by MarkRight 4 weeks, 1 day ago

Interesting blog as for me. I'd like to read a bit more concerning this topic.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN