|
|
 |
|

Cook needs to meet chairman Khaldoon Al Mubarak's targets
© Getty Images
|
Having failed to clinch a deal for Kaka in January 2009, Manchester City chief executive Garry Cook claimed AC Milan “bottled it”.
"He clearly was for sale but we never got to meet with the player,” Cook said at the time. “The behaviour of AC Milan got in the way."
It was a curious remark. City’s £100 million deal for Kaka was understandable for an ambitious, mega-rich club looking to reach parity with the big four, but it was always unlikely. For one thing, Brazilians rarely seem keen to move to England for whatever reason and Kaka, like Cristiano Ronaldo, had long seemed destined for a move to Real Madrid.
Cook, who arrived after 12 years with sportswear giant Nike, confirmed he had tried to negotiate with Kaka’s father on setting up humanitarian projects for the player, but said “financial demands came to the fore”. The suspicion then, as it is now, was that Cook hadn’t quite come to terms with the fact that City remain a work in progress on the field.
The point was brought home once more last month when Santos youngster Paulo Henrique Gansu suggested he was unhappy about City potentially getting first option on his signature as part of the Robinho loan. "I don't want to play for Manchester City,” he said. “I'd prefer to play for a big club in Europe such as Milan, Real Madrid or Barcelona." For Cook to insult Milan seemed naive to say the least and eyebrows have been raised ever since.
Reports have emerged in the national press that Cook’s position at City is under scrutiny. The Milan remark was not Cook’s only PR error. He had previously claimed former owner Thaksin Shinawatra - the former Thai PM accused of, among other things, corruption, tax evasion and authoritarianism - was “a great guy to play golf with” (perhaps Kaka’s father had been less than convinced about the motive behind the proposed humanitarian projects). More recently, the sacking of Mark Hughes in December was justifiable but its handling was wretched, and Cook attracted plenty more criticism after his explanation as to when exactly Roberto Mancini had been offered the post.
While trying to help City become “the biggest and best football club in the world”, Cook was last month helping Mancini strengthen in defensive midfield. Real Madrid’s Fernando Gago was the big target but, after early negotiations showed few signs of progress, they turned to Parma’s Kenya international McDonald Mariga. The move, according to Kenya PM Raila Odinga, fell through as City did not leave enough time to force through a work permit.
When it emerged that Mariga would not arrive, City went back in for Gago. However, as Real Madrid director general Jorge Valdano revealed this week, the bid was made so late in the day that there was no conceivable hope of the move being concluded. "They had nothing prepared, not even one document signed," he told El Pais. "They had not reached an agreement with the player and they would have had to have done everything in 40 minutes."
Some of the criticism that has come Cook’s way may well have been unfair and it is likely that many of the situations involved more complexities than we have been privy to, but the regularity of the avoidable bad press is alarming and it is hard to imagine that City’s owners are content. The club’s public image is souring and, unlike Peter Kenyon's time at Chelsea, targets have not been secured. If City are to become the biggest and best football club in the world, they may well be looking at someone with a background in the sport to help take them there.
Comments
 |
Posted by Armchair Supporter on 02/03/2010
Indeed - Cook has had plenty of time both before and after the window opened to prepare player acquisition, scenario and contingency plans with timelines for negotiation, permits, etc
I wonder if Cook can explain why the Marigo deal was not concluded earlier in the transfer window?
Cook may have some good marketing plans and he should focus on his strengths and as you say bring someone in to manage player acquisition.
 |
Posted by mancurian on 02/03/2010
Just another case of the big ambition but little club mentality that swirls around City. Get rid of the guy and bring in the "crooked" Peter Kenyon he will inprove the team image even more.
 |
Posted by neviboss on 02/03/2010
I suggest Cook goes back to selling footwear, as he's a liability and no benefit to football.
 |
Posted by notreallyhere on 02/03/2010
complete tosh.
1. in regards to the content of the article, what exactly has cook done wrong? his comment on Thaksin Shinawatra came at very precarious time and lets not forget that cook was hired by the man. mancini's appointment was admittedly poorly handled in regards to timing and such but that was the owners' call and cook was there to handle the press, which he handled as well as anyone could imo.
2. in regards to the comment, plenty of time?? mancini was appointed right before the window opened and with that comes a new style and system which is followed by players this managers wants to keep/get rid of and therefore new transfer targets.
Finally,rumors suggesting cook's job is under threat comes from a incident in a mcfc supporters bar in NYC which he claim "not if but when we beat united" pertaining to the second leg of league cup semi's. He was under the impression that no cameras were present--it was a cellphone video.
Investigative journalism? something this site is void of
 |
Posted by Akanbi Adeyinka on 02/03/2010
As a matter of fact, i don't think there is anything wrong about a club's chairman being passionate about is club, he has shown that he has the zeal and the enthusiasm for is club to be a top four club and honestly i don't think that there is anything wrong with that.
 |
Posted by somervillain on 02/03/2010
Interesting that Real Madrid basically have come out and leveled the very same charge against City that Cook made against AC Milan last year -- and this time you take it seriously while dismissing the previous one. Just so I make sure I understand this, when Manchester City criticize another club for messing up a transfer, they are delusional. But when another club accuses City of screwing up a transfer, it's evidence of City's incompetence? No, that's not hypocritical at all...
 |
Posted by notreallyhere on 02/03/2010
My earlier post wasn't put up, I see. Big surprise, Robin. What? Too many facts? . Oh and by the way, I am a City supporter and I read this site everyday. so just be mindful if anyone write articles about my club that are "leaky", I have no problem calling them out if I think my club is getting unfairly slighted. Not that you care any, you probably don't even follow football. Do you "have" a team? Do you know how it feels to get on the web every morning just to see another journo taking pot-shots at the club you hold dearest when you know they have no idea of what's really going on or even care about it?
 |
Posted by mark on 02/03/2010
The whole saga (Mariga & Gago) is so laughable. Cook has a lot of explaining to do. One more thing, was Manchini in the know?
 |
Posted by city72 on 02/03/2010
dood the mariga deal didn't go through because of england's b******t work permit rules for footballers. because kenya, mariga's home nation, has such a low international rating (80 something?) england won't grant the kid a work permit. why? why perpetuate football dynasties and stonewall players who could develop in the world's best league and bring that experience home to their low-ranking national sides. don't know. can't say. long live the queen.
-Indiana, U.S.A.
 |
Posted by Essman on 02/03/2010
What a pathetic piece of Citeh bashing from another Red eyed journo. I am not a Cook fan either, but at least get the facts straight. Mariga was signed contingent on a work visa. That visa was denied because of Kenya's FIFA rankings. Bobby Manc personally went to the hearing to attempt to gain a visa, but to no avail. They are the FACTS of the Mariga deal. Gago, well if he had been contacted, signed, agreed about in any possible way before an offer was made then the club and Cook would be getting hammered for "tapping up" another clubs player. Lets at least have it right.......
 |
Posted by j clark on 02/03/2010
I'm no City , Chelsea or Utd supporter but this article smacks of the beginnings of a PR push for Peter Kenyon to get the job.
 |
Posted by xXx on 02/03/2010
get lost!
that's all i have to say!
 |
Posted by Daniel Moss on 02/03/2010
I think Business Sense, Is largely absent from Footballing sense. The Beautiful Game, Is More Than About Attracting the Biggest Fish. It's about Leaving a legacy for the game to Attract New Followers. Cook is an Anarchist. He wants to burn the World with his greed. If City Becomes the New York Yankees of Baseball, Then I will have to become a Man U. Fan. And God Knows, There are Enough of those.
The Only Organization I think that Matches the Hubris of Cook Is Real Madrid, But that is Spain, Where Absurdity Is Commonplace, If not the Norm, And a Legacy has been Set, and People Are comfortable in it. England, I think, Don't have the same Footballing Culture, And even though the Eighties and Nineties saw the Rise of Truly Cut-throat Practices, In Financial Terms in the World of Sport, There is now a Price on the Head of Football, Where debt can topple even the Mightiest names, And Players , Great Players, Flee from one club to Another, Because they Fear for an elusive Greatness
 |
Posted by Chris Foo on 02/04/2010
Fact is, Cook hasn't the credentials, nor the credibility, to make City what the owners want it to become and to be - certainly (and realistically) a top ten European club.
That's an almighty ask, even if City recruits the very top footballing chief. But that's another matter.
What even a football bystander can figure out is this however....Cook definitely ain't the guy. So Mr Khaldoon, taking a cue from your handling of the Mark Hughes affair, why delay the inevitable on Cook ? Hell the jury's not out, they've already left the building !!
 |
Posted by Red Side of Manchester on 02/04/2010
Cook has no football background, I'm sure he knows a lot more about American sports than European League and what a 'big club' really means. For a team that hasn't made a Final in 34 years, to expect a player who has won the Champions League and is one of the best players in the world to play for them is pretty ludicrous.
Chelsea at the very least were already competing for Champions League Football, when Roman dumped his fortune into the club.
As for the Jan Transfer display, I'm sure Cook was acting in desperation, also figuring that Real would eventually loan City Gago last minute as they had no time to negotiate the required contract. Unfortunately for him, Real aren't stupid, if you want their player, they want to get paid for it, rather than a trial loan.
 |
Posted by NothingToLose 1 week, 5 days ago
It is rather interesting for me to read that blog. Thanx for it. I like such topics and everything that is connected to them. I definitely want to read a bit more soon.
Truly yours
Posted by MarkRight 1 week, 4 days ago
Great blog you got here. It would be great to read a bit more about this theme. Thanks for giving this material.
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|
|
|
|
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|