ESPN Soccernet - Soccernet Comments
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
RSS feed
Soccernet Comments
Posted by Jon Carter on 09/03/2009

Just when you thought the dullest transfer deadline day ever had dampened the spirits, something like this happens.

A contractual dispute between French club Lens, winger Gael Kakuta and English club Chelsea, which has been rolling on since 2007, has reared its ugly head to the extent that the Premier League title favourites are not allowed to bring in any new players for the next two transfer windows.

It turns out that having all the money in the world makes no difference when you break the rules and FIFA's Dispute Resolution Chamber has come down hard on those responsible. Chelsea have been charged with ''inducement'', and fined, while the ban has attempted to send a message to the rest of the footballing world.

But will it make a difference? Top players on top wages already exist in abundance at Stamford Bridge and there is little to suggest that Carlo Ancelotti will be overly bothered by the prospect of not being able to improve his squad over the next few windows. January certainly isn't a time that the big-boys traditionally bring players into their squads.

The club have hardly set the market alight with their signings in this window either. Ross Turnbull, Daniel Sturridge and Yuri Zhirkov arrived, but nothing like the spending that we have seen in the past. The days of Roman Abramovich bringing in £50m worth of talent appear to be gone and the 130,000 euros fine will be a drop in the ocean. Quietly, the Russian may be quite pleased.

The club can take heart from the precedent, too, as it involved a French club. Roma were banned from signing anyone for a year in 2005 for their signing of Philippe Mexès, but the Court of Arbitration for Sport cut their ban to one transfer window. Expect something similar to happen when the might of the Blues are involved this time around.

Still, Chelsea have been walking a fine line over transfers for a while now. The Ashley Cole situation is well-known to everyone in the game and resulted in fines from the FA, while John Obi Mikel's move from Lyn Oslo (via Old Trafford) was controversial as they had to pay £12m to United and £4m to Lyn, after a contract issue was resolved before it was heard by FIFA.

Indeed, something like this was always going to happen as they targeted players without much thought for their clubs. Money talks, but in this case it has got them in trouble and it could spell the end for Peter Kenyon. It will be interesting to see if FIFA follow suit with other clubs, as Chelsea cannot be the only guilty ones.

The irony is that it is a player who would not have been in the spotlight, had it not been for this news. Kakuta was on the verge of breaking into the first-team and would probably have been involved in their Carling Cup games this season, but he was hardly worth all the hassle.

The Blues will recover from their latest setback, but only if FIFA uphold the ban will they make a statement that this kind of behaviour cannot be tolerated. Perhaps, like the recent diving controversy with Eduardo, it is the first of many future cases to be opened.

Comments

Posted by ap on 09/03/2009

Serves Chelsea right... The shady dealings go all the way back to Obi Mikel. Its about time FIFA set the crook dealers straight.

Posted by Cory Rodgers on 09/03/2009

Breaking rules during the recruiting windows, and outside them, happens often even at the youth soccer level. One of the clubs in my area has constantly been breeching these simple rules, but has not been punished other than the proverbial "Slap on the Wrist". As a coach who competes in the market for the same players, and follows the rules while doing so, it would overjoy me to see consistant enforcement of the laws as they are written. I would imagine the other clubs who abide by the rules and compete for the same players that Chelsea does are pleased by this decision.

Posted by Mohamed Hussain on 09/03/2009

Next in line is Manchester City & Real MAdrid....

Posted by sly sylvester on 09/03/2009

well so unfuturenate but all thesame they should take heart that is life 4 you

Posted by Biodun on 09/03/2009

i am not in support of breaking rules, but i believe the extent of the ban is just too much. Positively it will be good for the Reserve players in the club to break into the first team, while negatively its hard on the corporate entity of Chelsea as a whole.

I believe chelsea will appeal, and the ban will be reduced.

Posted by Garrett on 09/03/2009

Sure Chelsea is guilty, but what about Real Madrid? What about Inter? What about United? What about City? If you're going to make an example, of course first you must pick on the English teams (FIFA/UEFA can't stand us) and then you must go after Chelsea.

Posted by Teeks on 09/03/2009

I agree with the above points (from the article). This will make no difference to the side since the transfers were settled LONG ago and there is no chance that Ancelotti was going to improve the squad anyway. There is depth, there are quality players, and a team that hasnt even come out the blocks yet. And still some players coming back from injury. This was more to try make a difference on Chelsea as opposed to making a point for the sport. It has failed however.

Posted by Chelsea4ever on 09/03/2009

Blatter just doesn't like Chelsea. When Chelsea was signing all the big players, he was saying that rich clubs this and that. When Real bought Ronaldo for £80million , he said it's not big deal because the players is worth that much.

Posted by benny o on 09/03/2009

am not going against the facts that chelsea are guilty, but must they be the first to be punished. manchester united and liverpool have been guilty in the past so fifa should have sympathy and sometimes respect the players decisions to perform at clubs where they are likely to prosper in the game despite contract regulations CHELSEA will still succeed in their present and future campaigns despite the transfer window ban UP CHELSEA for life

Posted by Jestears on 09/03/2009

When it comes to Chelsea doing it, the whole football world will make a hoohaa out of it.. but when the other big clubs are the ones doing it, no one will take notice..

Posted by Sudhan on 09/03/2009

NOOOOO!!!! chelsea.... not fare... who cares we'll still win everything with our existing playas.... GO CHELSEAFC!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by manu on 09/03/2009

They deserve it!!! That will serve ancelotti right!!!!!!!

Posted by mike on 09/03/2009

I agree totally with FIFA's decision just as i did when drogba was banned for his shameful acts in last seasons champions league. ONCE the ban is reduced to one window chelsea fans will breathe a little easier. As one of them i know that other clubs that have been named in these posts are ALL guilty of these same charges. Let this FINALLY be the end of PETER KENYON.

Posted by Tim on 09/03/2009

Chelsea have done no worse than Arsenal, Man Utd etc have been doing for years. Scholes from Oldham, Beckham from Spurs, Giggs from Man City, Fabregas from Barcelona... the list is huge. Chelsea have once again been made a scapegoat. This sort of thing SHOULD be stamped out but unfortunately it never will. Look at head-hunting firms in the real job market, if an employee wants to leave there is very little that can be done. If it was you being offered extra money and a better career option wouldn't you feel aggrieved if you weren't allowed to do it because you had previously signed a contract when you weren't as good at your job?

Posted by Brian on 09/03/2009

As a Chelsea fan I would like to defend my favorite club, to a point. Personally, I find the dealings of my favorite club disgusting, but:

Although the club is ultimately responsible, this is not about Chelsea. This is about Peter Kenyon.

Kenyon was often rumored to have done shady dealings at Man United as well. I was appalled when Chelsea brought him in, and it is no surprise to me.

I agree with making clubs responsible for their employees, but it's time to go a step further. WHO is responsible? Like any major corporation, there is someone at the top of this. And although Mr. Abramovich hired Kenyon, this man has a history of this. Time to start hanging PEOPLE out as well.

Posted by perry on 09/03/2009

WOW, I agree with the above comment that FIFA and UEFA don't like English Football and especially Chelsea. Who is next in line to get a transfer ban? Blatter loves C. Ronaldo and everyone knows that and Im sure Real Madrid, Man. City and Man. United have never done anything wrong....Please FIFA and UEFA need to revamp their own governing bodies. In spite of UEFA and FIFA, I hope Chelsea go on to win the EPL and Champions League.

Posted by aaron on 09/03/2009

i can see this being appealed and the ban being reduced to extend only through one transfer period, BUT, it if does indeed stand, in hindsight Chelsea may consider it a stroke of good luck that they did not offload the likes of Deco, Kalou, and Carvalho this season. (Or let go of Bosingwa to Munchen or Terry to City)
Di Santo is at blackburn until only January, correct? And is Ben Sahar still on loan or was he sold? They'll certainly need midfield cover during the African Nations Cup, Belletti can slot in there as well.
I was, however, expecting to see Pato next summer.

Posted by FunnyDevil on 01/26/2010

It is certainly interesting for me to read this blog. Thanx for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to them. BTW, try to add some images :).

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN