|
|
 |
|
One of the fringe benefits of following a football team is the way it enables the charting of life, anchoring unrelated but parallel experiences in time and place. But to every up there's a down; when things go badly, definitive connotations are unavoidably forced upon feelings that deserve to stand alone, happy times contaminated with disappointment.
So it is that my girlfriend's 30th birthday celebrations will be forever entwined with ceding the title, though if you will get yourself born in the second week of May and then succumb to a Unitedaholic, you've only yourself to blame. And spare a thought too for poor Greenwich Village, no longer just a trigger for simple associations of Bob Dylan, Jimi Hendrix and some good nights out, but now inextricably linked to the same unfortunate event.
At least the time difference meant that it was all over and done with by lunchtime, meaning less time to wait in grim expectation – though only in the US could live sport be shown on delay, so as to squeeze in a few more commercials - and more time to dull the pain with celebratory refreshments.
The game itself was an exercise in tolerance. Though I stationed myself in such a position as to ensure that there was no way I could see the screen showing Chelsea, however much the urge to ogle at unpleasantness challenged me, it was impossible to insulate myself from the hell yeah whooping and hollering emanating from its direction. Luckily, my attention was diverted by the replica-clad girl sat next to me, who taught me that "Berbatov is like, so awful", amongst other gobbets of wisdom.
In terms of leagues not won, the sting of losing this time was relatively minor, a slap in the face rather than a boot in the balls. The run-in of 1992 served as an inoculation against all subsequent on-pitch failures, though I admit to my seduction by the prospect of increasing the pretty leagues all in a row, at the same time as overtaking Liverpool's total tally. And, of course, by the selfish desire to sell souvenir books, though despite drawing on my bar mitzvah and losing on my 18th birthday, in the main United have won when I've needed them to the most, the titles won in each of my three years as a student particularly appreciated.
That isn't to say it's enjoyable losing to a squad including Terry, Lampard, Cole, other Cole, Drogba and Ballack, because it isn't, and that's without even getting started on Abramovich. But even in that context, Chelsea mean very little, the artificial nature of their success and support according them no real significance. Nonetheless, having accumulated the most points, they've been unarguably the best team, so, through gritted soul, congratulations to them.
As for United, they had a better season than I thought they might, though not as good a season as they should have done. Whenever a league is narrowly lost, there'll be specific moments that it's easy to blame, most obviously the arse-end of the decisions in both games against Chelsea. But though they did make a crucial difference, there were also plenty of opportunities to render them irrelevant, in particular the failure to cash in on an easy run of games either side of the New Year, and it's frustrating that the title was surrendered without forcing the winners to produce something exceptional.
And in the same way Fergie has been credited in the past with dragging his men to titles, this time he made nowhere near the best of the resources available to him. Or in other words, had I been in charge, United would still be champions, and most likely preparing for another European final. I say this not because I rate myself as a manager, though clearly I do, but because the errors in selection and tactics have been of such obvious and glaring nature. As it happens, similar ones were also made last season and to a lesser degree the one before, but Ronaldo and occasionally Tevez were on-hand to mask them, whereas this time round, there was no such security.
In public at least, Fergie has been keen to voice satisfaction with how things went, despite a third consecutive year of decline. Earlier in the week, he confided that "I look into my own management and the rest of the staff. Did I always make the right team selections with the appropriate tactics? Do we have a strong enough squad?", the implication being that he did and we do.
Any such notions are, of course, utterly fatuous. There exist exceptionally clear cases of incorrect selection – Liverpool away and Chelsea at home, for example - and also of tactics, both Bayern games springing immediately to mind. And incontrovertible proof that the squad isn't strong enough was provided by the season-ruining effect of Rooney's brief absence.
In reality, the likelihood is that Fergie is cognisant of at least this third aspect, his ability to do something about it dependent on whom he can sell and how much more debt the Glazer credit card can wear. Foster will certainly be for the off, as will Berbatov if a buyer can be found. Carrick, too, is done, his contribution fading in line with the team - unsurprising from a player who reflects rather than inflects – and at long industrious last, Park has also fallen out of favour.
In terms of additions, more than anything, an attacking midfielder of genuine class is required – there are plenty of good players at United, but not enough brilliant ones. This season, when the whole team has clicked, they've played very well, but lacking has been individuals able to conjure victory when things are going badly.
Therefore the end of the season doesn't merit the kind of pontificating crescendo I had planned. Thus, all that remains to say is thanks for reading, thanks for your comments, and next year in Jerusalem!
On The Road will be available in book form as soon as possible, from www.danielharriswriter.co.uk
Comments
 |
Posted by John French on 05/18/2010
Daniel, ignoring your comments about Cole, Terry etc. as you must realise that most people are hardly better disposed towards the likes of Fergie, Rooney, Scoles and Ferdinand. You do need to get your facts straight about targeting Chelsea's 'plastic fans'. Er, polite cough I think all top flight teams playing at home have mostly plastic fans and no atmosphere compared to 10 or 20 years ago. The lack of atmosphere at most grounds is startling. Anyway look at the attached link to see that Chelsea have always been one of the better supported clubs and for several postwar years were getting the largest crowds and of course hold the record home attendance (82,905 versus Arsenal) at their OWN crowd.
http://www.european-football-statistics.co.uk/attn.htm
 |
Posted by M.G. on 05/18/2010
I once called you deluded and I apologise. Some of the things you wrote about the human condition were very interesting. You are too one-eyed for my liking (eg. Chelsea winning at OT in the run-in wasn't proving their worth as EPL champions?) but what fan isn't, ultimately.
 |
Posted by daniel harris on 05/18/2010
go on then john, i'll bite. i'm no fan of fergie, but to compare him to the likes or terry and cole is utterly ridiculous. fergie has given an incredible amount to the english and world game, unlike cole and terry, who have largely taken. you're right that there are plenty who don't like fergie, but plenty outside of united who respect him and speak well of him; i don't know of anyone who likes either of the 2 you mention.
similarly, i have no time for ferdinand, but to compare him to terry and cole is arrant nonsense. he behaves like a thug neither on the pitch nor off it, however much of idiot he may or may not be.
rooney is by all accounts a nice bloke - he competes hard and is given to rashness, but save an episode or two whilst still a teenager, off the pitch conducts himself with dignity and class. just like terry and cole eh?
why you mention scholes i have no idea. never attracts adverse headlines, no big mouthed belligerence, no sense of entitlement, no attention seeking, no agent, no outrageous contract demands, the consummate pro - we're privileged to be living in his time.
 |
Posted by sweetchucksono on 05/18/2010
To offload Carrick and Berba would be a loss, as i believe these two need to play together. Only Carrick has the knack of finding Berba's run, and if you check the team lineup they rarely played together. Also, Rafael needs to play more, it is not good for his development to pull him out of the line up every game he made a mistake. Rooney needs this season after conceding the alpha-dog stature to Ronaldo following the World Cup sending off. Nani's coming of age when he was played on the right can be more exciting if it wasnt followed by Valencia's exile. Next season will be tough, especially after Rooney's imminent injury at the World Cup (playing for another team that relies solely on him). I hope the youngsters will get more chance next season, Macheda and Obertan is ready.
 |
Posted by matt on 05/18/2010
your a united fan one week.. critic the next. i remember your article about going into hiding after united drew at blackburn. why dont you just ease up on the united bashing while you consider the fact that we won the last 3 titles in a row and made 2 champions league finals in 2 years.
"it's frustrating that the title was surrendered without forcing the winners to produce something exceptional"
chelsea scored 7 or more goals in 4 different games. i would call that exceptional.
 |
Posted by paul daley on 05/18/2010
Will the book be out in time for Channukah?
 |
Posted by Louie Alissa on 05/18/2010
Daniel, you hit the nail on the head when you sed 'IF' we can find a buyer for berbatov. the signing of hernandez, will most likely not bare fruit for a few seasons. and i fear that he will turn out like manucho etc. as for an attacking mid. we have not had anyone in that position for so long it hurts. fergie's insistance on playing through the wings mainly shows a lack of flexibility in our squad. if hargreaves can get himself fit, for next season, and by some sort of miracle remain that way than we will be solid enough in the deep midfield area. in short, another striker, a left-footed left midfielder and an attacking mid with class is needed.
get rid of carrick, the disgraceful attempt at a tackle that let to ilic's goal is haunting me.
 |
Posted by Dean-Strauss on 05/18/2010
This blog has been excellent all year and I am truly sad to see it go. Hopefully, us readers will be kept informed as to Daniels future writings.
 |
Posted by areen attari on 05/18/2010
i have absolutely loved reading your writings since you began on soccernet, although lots of your figures of speech go above my head!
i think you have guts, because you challenge fergies reign, simply because most united fans believe he is the be all and end all end everything he does is right!
however, i would honestly love to see a bit more optimism in your writing, at least with regards to united! a balance of that and your current style would truly reflect your feelings of passion
 |
Posted by Nick on 05/18/2010
I have just one word to say for the reason why Man U lost the Premier League this year - BURNLEY!!!
 |
Posted by Steven S. on 05/18/2010
About ManU, Sir Alex, & Scholes' perception problems.
Simply put, they come across as arrogant in a way that no other Premier League side does; and much of that fault lies at the feet of Sir Alex.
I don't know how many times I read this pair of articles: "Man U. loses/draws","Sir Alex rips refereeing" -- but I suspect it was nearly every time.
It's as if they don't think they can lose unless the men in black are opposing them.
Chelsea will, to their detractors, always be viewed as the Moneybags team -- no soul, just cash; Arsenal as a bunch of prissy aesthetes who insist that their way is best even as they lose (well, this incarnation -- I still remember 1-0 to the Arsenal); while Man U? The team that can't believe that it's lost without someone cheating.
(Now, are any of these fair? Not really.)
And for Mr. Scholes -- off-field, fine; on-field, his tackling is so insanely reckless that if a defender did it, they'd get so many cards and so much flak their careers would be over.
 |
Posted by Henny on 05/18/2010
Utter rubbish. They lose arguably the second best player on the planet in Ronaldo, and a 20 plus goal scorer in Tevez, and only miss out on the league title by a point, and the Champions league by a speculative red card call. Replace this charlatan with a true red.
 |
Posted by Speidermann on 05/18/2010
Steven S. is obviously a Liverpool fan. I'm terribly sorry.
 |
Posted by Steven S. on 05/19/2010
Actually, the EPL is a league where I don't have too much by way of loyalty -- my loyalties are in the Bundesliga, Eredivisie, and La Liga.
However, I do have sympathy for my Liverpool-fan co-worker, and I admit I've not been irritated enough by Liverpool over the last few years, or seen other people irritated by them, to come up with a proper stereotype. ;)
 |
Posted by baba on 05/19/2010
..."get rid of carrick, the disgraceful attempt at a tackle that let to ilic's goal is haunting me."
"get rid of carrick, the disgraceful attempt at a tackle that let to ilic's goal is haunting me."
"get rid of carrick, the disgraceful attempt at a tackle that let to ilic's goal is haunting me."
DITTO HERE.
 |
Posted by V on 05/20/2010
Third year in decline? Are u serious? If I'm correct, the first of those '3 years' was the Champions League-winning year!
 |
Posted by Fred on 05/20/2010
Agreed on Carrick. Unfortunately for him, he follows in a line of United midfielders which, in my lifetime, has included Robson, Ince, Keane, Scholes. Players whose poor games in a season could be counted on one hand.
He started the season out of favour after his failure to show up in Rome. When intoduced back in to the team he was little more than a passenger. His shocking performance at city in the League Cup ended up with a hairdryer of such epic proportions he probably went to bed that night praying for alopecia.
After a brief improvement, which admittedly included a superb performance at Emirates, he soon reverted to his half-arsed worst. Given that he was dropped for the last 7 or 8 league games, his only involvement towards the end of the season came via his awful performances home and away to Bayern.
Carrick is a man of few obvious abilities. Can't shoot or tackle, lacks skill and pace. He relies almost completely on his passing which, simply, isn't up to scratch.
 |
 |
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|
|
|
|
About
Daniel Harris is an ex-City lawyer, and now a writer and a bit of a journalist. He contributes to United fanzine Redissue, and his blockbusting debut novel will be out in a bit.
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|