ESPN Soccernet - On The Road
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
RSS feed
On The Road
Posted by Daniel Harris on 02/19/2010

There was no shotgun shack or beautiful automobile, but racing along a gangway in front of the Milan fans celebrating United’s third goal, arms flailing and shrieking like a braking train, I suddenly found myself asking a question made famous by Talking Heads: how did I get here? This was quickly followed by two more of my own: what am I doing, and how am I still alive? Sadly, I’ll never know the answer to any; such is the price of the Champions League.

Repeated visits to the same cities impose no obligation to sightsee, entertainment sought instead in the twin pleasures of good food and good drink. If the former is easily found, the latter is perhaps too easily found, and raises problems of its own; how to measure the precise amount of red wine that will sustain a warming buzz until after the post-match lock-in? Someone may have happened upon the formula, but it is most assuredly not me.

Losing my mates en route to the ground I somehow managed to wander into the curva sud, helpfully identifying my allegiance with a green and gold scarf. Exactly what happened next is unclear, the first half passing in something of a blur, and my only real memory is of being foxed by the perennially cunning interval into thinking the game was over.

Anyway, that turned out not to be the case, and I passed the second 45 standing on the aforementioned gangway, where I was offered no biscuits. Supervised by a steward and various home fans I befriended, people were nonetheless surprisingly affable given my unrestrained goonery, though it would be disingenuous of me not to mention that by this time I’d detected a mysterious ache in the jaw area; my osso bucco must’ve been less tender than I thought.

Despite the recently-improved European record, there remain very few away wins against decent outfits during the Fergie years; two in Turin, with nods towards Montpellier and Legia Warsaw if we’re being exceptionally generous. Fergie trying to play tactics has been probably the major cause of the struggles, and Tuesday was no exception, rejigging the midfield an entirely unnecessary measure. Even so, on this occasion the fault lay far more with the players, their play soft, tepid and sloppy, like a turd sandwich.

With so many culpable it’d be harsh to single out individuals, though Fergie felt no such indecision, subjecting Jonny Evans to a classic public mapoleh whilst everyone else enjoyed the equaliser. His malaise was hard to understand, given the composed way he handled last season’s game at Inter, so it’s tempting to put his indecision down to having to cover for the far less likeable and well-off-the-pace Ferdinand.

Although Scholes’ goal involved a significant element of luck, coming at the end of a quick and incisive move you’d expect him to finish, it wasn’t quite the fluke suggested by Leonardo after the game. But it did provide United with the impetus to impose themselves in the proper manner thereafter, Fletcher dominating midfield with another display of aggression and intelligence.

Of course the headlines went again to Wayne Rooney, hotter than Flasheart’s pants and even more prolific, despatching two more of the headers that I criticised him for missing but a few weeks ago. Sulking through the first half and deciding that Nani was to blame after he was caught on his heels by a couple of pretty decent crosses, the second was a different story, his pace, strength and movement way too much for a very lame defence.

Amusingly, as United left the San Siro in glorious victory, City were busy struggling to a draw against ten-man Stoke. After so many years of consummate and perpetual failure, it was no shock to hear that they’re contemplating a different sport, reportedly considering an investment in one of the new IPL cricket franchises. This also explained what Patrick Vieira was up to, getting in some early practice by taking aim at Glenn Whelan’s middle stump.

The IPL is the very zenith of sport’s defilement by business, taking place for no reason other than its ability to generate cash for people who already have plenty, at the expense of genuine competition at the same time. Thus it was fitting the story broke the same week we heard of Premier League plans to allocate the final Champions League spot via a play-off, a measure that would no doubt please the desperates at Wastelands.

On my very first Euro away – the 3-3 at Barcelona in 1999 – United fans were singing “we’re here coz we won f**k all”, poking fun at a tournament claiming to be for champions but inviting participation from runners up. This too was a ruse to make more money, but at least there was the consolation of a sporting angle – a competition featuring league winners alone could be sure only of having the best teams from the previous season. So despite the motivation, standards improved as a result, whereas admitting the seventh placed team would achieve quite the reverse.

Of course the proposal has been dressed up as serving the interests of fairness, but if that were really of interest then a salary cap, combined with a transfer cap, would be far more effective. This would allow teams to retain the advantages legitimately acquired over years of success and support, at the same time as preventing the distortion of the game by the likes of Chelsea, City, and, in a slightly different way, Real Madrid.

But then that would restrict how much money could be made, which would never do; far better to protect the vested interests, regardless of what it means for the integrity of the competition. The NFL is a case in point; because an equal league makes more money, every step is taken to artificially arrange one. It may be less predictable, but winning the Superbowl is almost a rota, and there’s not much glory in that.

The inspiration, both in sport and in life, might be the idea of being the best, but the challenge is fairly making the most of whatever abilities have been unfairly allocated. Otherwise, we’re missing the point of Talking Heads’ question.

Comments

Posted by R. Smith on 02/19/2010

I find your article interesting, in that within two paragraphs you argue against the advantages possessed by Chelsea and Real Madrid while arguing for the advantages possessed by Manchester United simply because they are "legitimately acquired over years of success and support".

I must object, not least of all because it could be argued that no club can boast years of success and support quite like Real Madrid can, but because you go on to deride the NFL for attempting to enforce a level playing field despite any detriment to the overall level of competition. You must realize that your club represents one of the "vested interests" in the EPL. A United, or any other big #, fan must fear nothing more than change, because with it may come the loss of a title shot every other year.

Clubs like Chelsea and City are competing in the only way possible, by attempting to deal directly with United's massive spending power. They may not have history, but neither did United at one point in time

Posted by sankalp on 02/20/2010

When you say "clubs like chelsea and city are competing in the only way possible" maybe you forget that a way to compete might be to get your youth systems going, if not only to get quality on the pitch but to maybe an inflow of cash to be generated by sale of the academy products. Chelsea and city have chosen to discard this way. They want instant success, which no matter how much you spend, will always taste like instant coffee.

When we won the league after 26 years, it was not because we bought every single player available at that time, but because we knew how to rebuild.

Sir Alex chose to do it the way Matt Busby had done it, developing talent inside the club and complementing it with some on the outside, rather than what chelsea and city did, which was to buy wholesale mercenaries.

Posted by AV on 02/20/2010

First off, are Harry Harris and Daniel Harris the same person or not? Secondly, both tend to dabble in lucid doses nostalgia and self-deprecation, getting off on memories of 'the good ole' days'. Did the IPL have nothing to do with the stale state of affairs in world cricket and the masses begging for something different and more exciting? Yes, different, the opposite of whats been going on forever. The same with the CL, was it not born from a need for more excitement? Was there no demand for it? Yes, your point on money ruling all is valid, but it is not the pied piper leading everyone in a direction simply because of its trance inducing music. The times, they are a changin Harris, Ron Burgundy had never heard off that song, but I hope you have my friend.

Posted by tuhin on 02/20/2010

Hi there,

I would like to say a few things about Real Madrid in particular here. Their 5 consecutive ECC titles in the 50s came due to spending on the best players and not having any youth academy as such which could have been replicated by any team that had the money they had.During that time, United had the fruitful results of their academy in the form of the Babes. These were 2 radically opposite views of making a team. Yet I will support the latter even thoug Madrid beat us in the 1957 ECC semifinal. It is very easy to buy players and buy success.After Munich happened, Jimmy Murphy tried to buy Ferenc Puskas but he went to Madrid for a greater pay.

Had other teams had money like Madrid, they could have bought Pele and Garrincha and also won the ECC then. What I am focussing on here is that the local development of a team is more preferred as a way to achieve success than merely inflating the transfer market as Chelsea and City have done recently and Madrid have always

Posted by Jack on 02/20/2010

The format switch in the CL made perfect sporting sense. This idea that the champions from one league must be stronger than the runners-up from another is ludicrous. Even in the 80s, do you really think the Swedish or Polish champions provided more competition than say, AC Milan would even if Juventus won Serie A? UEFA's coefficients are provided by merit of performance, and the top leagues get more representatives because they have proven their quality. The CL is a much stronger tournament than the EC was.

Posted by Marty on 02/20/2010

You think winning against 20 teams at about the same level as you has less glory than winning the perennial two-horse race that is the EPL? You are greatly deluded. The New Orleans Saints came from nowhere this year and they won their championship with far greater merit than the tired 2008-9 campaign that United put in. New Orleans didn't lose to their nearest competitor by a 6-2 aggregate either.

Posted by valenciaisthebest on 02/20/2010

Like I said in my other posts. Milan is too old. Until they get rid of old players like seerdorf,pirlo, maldini, and pato they wont have the energy week in and week out to compete for anything.

Posted by Al on 02/20/2010

sankalp - u say City has no academy/youth coming thru - are u deluded?? Have u heard of Ireland?, Richards?, Wright-Phillips?, Onuoha? Weiss? Recently Boyata...all after years in City's academy...
You're just throwing your comments out there with no knowledge...
I'd be more interested in who has come thru the united system lately....

Posted by asdasd on 02/21/2010

"Until they get rid of old players like seerdorf,pirlo, maldini, and pato they wont have the energy week in and week out to compete for anything."
Pato is 20.

Posted by dan on 02/21/2010

same as it ever was...

Posted by Chris on 02/21/2010

Daniel Harris has to be the most blinkered writer on soccernet. Your writing style is ponderous, unequivocal and frustruatingly one-sided. You seem more concerned about pointing out how awful other teams are, while forgetting that these teams are equally prestigious and worthy of respect.

You sadly fit the negative Manchester United fan stereotype of a glory-hunting, arrogant person who believes that Manchester United has a god-given right to win and succeed. Sport consists of more than one team, Daniel.

Also, may I ask the soccernet staff why is Manchester United allowed to have another blog when there is a perfectly good one (a better writer too) in the Club Blogs section. This blog is poorly written and unnecessary.

Posted by jey on 02/21/2010

United does not have an academy, they took ROnaldo form Porto Rooney from Everton, there is not one great player, I do not count Giggs and Scoles as they ar 65 years old by now, united goes around and buys players or steals underage players form Italy. United is more in debt than chelsea or city, what you are going to do when they go the way of porthsmouth and leeds, that day is comming. It will be fun for us watching 70000 united fans watching a league one game at old traford between United and Tranmere. Your away trips to Brighton and Southend instead of milan and barcelona.
Your jealosy at Chelsea and City must come for a reason that they have owners that care about their team, and have money to spend, and you have oners that will put their mother for a colateral on a loan
By the way Chelsea has a great academy where we are taking most of our players from, it is called west ham youth program.

Posted by The truth on 02/22/2010

A very simple argument from me: what is the point of having a good youth academy system when the club cannot retain players to play in the club. Sure you can make money that way...but the talent is gone to the money clubs: Chelsea and City. Best example is West Ham who have many players from the youth system in the big four but cannot keep any talent there. Great point Mr. Jey as West Ham literally is the youth program for chelsea. THE MORAL IS THAT MONEY WINS.

Posted by Beitse on 02/22/2010


"Daniel Harris has to be the most blinkered writer on soccernet. Your writing style is ponderous, unequivocal and frustruatingly one-sided. You seem more concerned about pointing out how awful other teams are, while forgetting that these teams are equally prestigious and worthy of respect.

You sadly fit the negative Manchester United fan stereotype of a glory-hunting, arrogant person who believes that Manchester United has a god-given right to win and succeed. Sport consists of more than one team, Daniel."

Err this is a Manchester United fans blog, get over it.

Posted by LFC_Joe on 02/22/2010

@tuhin, r u suggesting Real Madrid only came into existance in the 50's??!! Real's history goes way back, almost to the 19th century (actually 1902). And it is the support they had built from 1902 to 1950 that made them such a wealthy club in the 50's.
Kinda like ManU's success in the 90's made them such a wealthy club in the noughties, that is until they were bought by the Glazers.

Posted by Mohan on 02/23/2010

@LFC_Joe, It is a well known fact that, Real Madrid's money did not come from support by their fans. In fact Barca had more fans than Real during the 20's and 30's. It is because of a dictator named General Franco and his bags of pesos that baught akk the success that Madrid had. I think that's what the author of this article was aluding to. United; I wish had a dictator like that we wouldn't be competing with Liverpool's of this world.

Posted by LFC_Joe on 02/24/2010

@Mohan, I would even settle for an oil tycoon... anything better than those blood-sucking yanks. I have nothing against Americans BTW. I would resent Hicks and Gillett regardless of their nationality, and I am sure many Mancunians feel the same way about the Glazers.

Posted by peter on 02/24/2010

Man Utd
Youth system comes good > 1st team win titles > wealth accumulated through title wins and glory > revenue earned used to buy good players.

Chelsea and Man city
No revenue > lousy 1st team > no titles > no wealth > no revenue > Debt turned to "equity" used to buy good players.

WOW.

Posted by ashley12 on 02/24/2010

Long time reader, first time poster

Like I said in my other posts. Milan is too old. Until they get rid of old players like seerdorf,pirlo, maldini, and pato they wont have the energy week in and week out to compete for anything.

Seedorf is one of their best hard running players, and having him in the midfield is the reason they are able to usually have such an attacking three in Borrielo, Ronaldinho and Pato. Maldini has been retired as of last season, Pato is 20 and having the likes of Gattuso and Seedorf allow Milan to use Pirlo as a deep laying playmaker, like how having Mascherano allows Gerrard when playing further up the park to be slightly less responsible defensively.

And LOL at discounting Scholes, Giggs, Neville et all because they actually have had long, productive careers.

About Real Madrid, their "fans" came on when they started winning big thanks to the $$ from Franco. This history though, cant be doubted, and they deserve respect as a club, if not admiration

Posted by Gemma on 02/24/2010

Beitse:

I am a Man U fan, but I must agree that Daniel Harris is a pretty awful writer. Using fancy words and extensive obscure imagery does not make his articles more coherent, but rather more ponderous and arrogant sounding.

Furthermore, I do agree with Daniel that he has a very bad habit of putting down other teams instead of focusing on Manchester United. As the world's greatest club, are we that insecure?

Posted by henrik on 02/24/2010

the worlds greatest club?? Man Utd?

the worlds greatest club lost to Burnley 1-0, and to Fulham 3-0.

Now I'm being told they are pretty much through to the next round in the champs league.
If Fulham can smash them 3-0, why cant AC Milan win 2-0.

I remember Man Utd fans thinking they were on top of AC Milan when they won 3-2 at home (but you could tell AC Milan were taking it easy.
then what happened? 3-0 to AC Milan, and everyone was going on about AC Milan being to old then...
...AC Milan won that champions league easily and looked like they didnt have to sweat it out either.

Posted by kartik Vashisth on 02/25/2010

I love ur post. It looks as if it comes from a die hard united fan, and that is what it should be like, being a fan blog. But I would request you not to discuss Manchester City antics here, unless it is directed at United. They simply arn't worth discussing. They arn't our competitors in anyway.
By the way, IPL is just like EPL. A six hour cricket game shortened to 2 hours. And it has got lot of moolah. But the thrill of Sachin Tendulkar batting against Warne is something like Pele Vs Maradona. Even greater.... i.e. if u have hear of Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar

Posted by ilya b on 02/25/2010

who told this guy that he can write? someone has obviously misled you and giving you a forum where your voice can be heard is a huge mistake. Hence I'm led to beleive that out of the many intellectually challenged man-children who call themselves ManU fans, there are none who can write an objective blog with relevant commentary. Otherwise why would ESPNsoccernet still have Daniel as the ManU blogger. Its not hard to put together 3 pages of gloating, especcialy when you've picked a team that has dominated the competition since the 90s. Give me some substance dude....

Posted by kartik Vashisth on 02/26/2010

Calm down guys.. Daniel is not a correspondent who would talk about the match. "On the roads", as the name of the blog suggests, is journey of a fan through the season. It is essential that he be watching all/most matches in "Theater of Dreams", talk about emotional ups and downs during the match etc.. so that we can get a vicarious thrill.
But again all united fans feel that this is the best club in the world and has the right to succeed in every competition, still Daniel would do well by sticking to united only and not dwell in other teams.

Posted by chris on 02/26/2010

I would also like to ask why there has been no On The Road coverage about the 3-1 loss to Everton. Surely, that is an away match which should be covered as well? Just thought that it would provide for a more balanced blog, so that it does not appear as if Daniel Harris only sings when Man Utd is winning.

Posted by ABBA on 03/09/2010

@ kartik Vashisth:
"..."On the roads", as the name of the blog suggests, is journey of a fan through the season. It is essential that he be watching all/most matches in "Theater of Dreams"..."

Er, not really. I believe Harris doesn't go to Old Trafford as a boycott against the Glazers. Hence he only goes "on the road", ie to the away matches.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN