ESPN Soccernet - On The Road
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
RSS feed
On The Road
Posted by Daniel Harris on 12/24/2009

Oscar Wilde once joked that he was so clever, often he didn't understand a word of what he was saying, and he wasn't even speaking in Scottish. So imagine how hard it must be for poor Fergie to decode his complexities into a suitable football team; seeing something that others can't might be a hallmark of genius, but there's always the chance that you might just be seeing things.

Because football is a perfectly balanced game, its formations are an unsolvable riddle; add something in one place, lose something in another. Nonetheless, there's a reason no one plays 3-5-2 anymore, and why its most famous proponent also thinks that suffering is a punishment for sins in a previous life. But for some hallucinatory reason, Fergie decided it was the best way of lining up at Fulham, forcing players already in unfamiliar roles into an unfamiliar system - one that effectively ignores the four corners of the pitch, particularly disadvantageous for a team that aims to make the playing space as wide as possible.

With a squad shorn of defenders, not even the most inveterate of acid casualties would have deployed one of its best at wingback, but there Patrice Evra was, not even moved when things went wrong. Meanwhile, Darren Fletcher, whose drive in midfield was so sorely missed against Villa, toiled at the back to no avail.

According to the law of moments, an object is in equilibrium when the net force and net torque exerted upon it are zero. Unfortunately, at the very time he needs to do least, Fergie is pressing and twisting like a bodybuilding Vulcan, conned into believing his own omnipotence after getting away with it against West Ham and Wolfsburg.

In fact the Wolfsburg game was a triple punishment, resulting in yet another tedious trip to Milan, instead of one to Seville, as well as encouraging continued perseverance with the frankly execrable Michael Owen, about whom Fergie seems determined to be proved right. Notwithstanding the obvious exception, after which he should have been summarily binned on the basis that it could only get worse, he has contributed startlingly little, and not even for a single moment looked a footballer of United quality.

Although this continued at Fulham, he was in no way helped by the incompetence of those around him. Watching the highlights, I was no less shocked to hear the commentary say "and Scholes has lost the ball again" than I was observing it at the time, despite his waning powers. The last two games have also illustrated how important Giggs continues to be, who claimed this week that not to have noticed much difference since Ronaldo left; he must be eating more buttered toast than he's letting on.

Anyway, once Fulham scored, the game was effectively over - there was more chance of Godot turning up than a United goal. Expecting to see the players coming out for the second half dripping with tea and hoping that Fergie and Phelan had also chucked a few cups at each other, they instead trooped meekly out to concede again – you can only hope that the tanning machine reported to reside at Carrington does actually hand out tannings.

Whilst even the grizzliest car crash is strangely compelling, its footballing equivalent was anything but, United's show bereft of any redeeming quality whatsoever, other than the fact that it ended. All those involved should feel very ashamed indeed.

Luckily no one else has been good enough to take proper advantage, and although neither Chelsea nor Arsenal are mugs (or should that be mags?), it's fair to say that this year's champions will be the weakest in a while, whoever they turn out to be. Talking of Arsenal, their substitutes showed no shame in sitting on the bench at Hull wrapped in blankets, only marginally better than the furry animal outfits they're pictured in all over London; I wonder why opponents consider them such a soft touch.

Of course the principal joy of this time of the year is the PDC Darts World Championship, and we have number three seed James Wade to thank for furnishing us with the following anecdote, in an interview with the Daily Star.

"I was down in the local chemist in Cobham and this guy went to me, "All right, Wadey?" I thought it was someone trying to be a pest. I replied, "All right". He then texted my girlfriend with the message: "How rude is your boyfriend?""

"He" turned out to be John Terry, so please be forewarned; should he ever say hello to you, be sure to respond with requisite ecstasy. Terry was one of many players to turn down the ludicrously acquired coin of Manchester City, who this week dispensed with the services of Leslie Hughes.

It's sad that ten years of genuine heroism can be irreparably tarnished by an 18-month period, but it's fair to say that most United supporters will never look at him in the same way again; not just for going there, but because of the alacrity with which he embraced the delusion.

He may have been unlucky to lose his job, but knew what he was getting himself into and deserves criticism for the total lack of imagination in any of his signings. At first it seemed odd that Roberto Mancini was considered to be a definitively better option, his success in Italy predicated on the disqualification of the teams who were better than his, but then that's exactly what City are attempting by way of artificially-gained wealth.

And we must also be pleased Hughes failed so that we were not denied the breathtakingly mendacious arrogance of Garry Cook's press conference. Justifiably nailed by most sensible commentators already, all that remains is to chortle at his utter dislocation from reality. There really are too many highlights to list, but here are a few:

He began by pontificating that "the owner, chairman and myself all worked to give Mark any resources he required", but did not expand on his contribution to the exchequer of the Al Nahyan family; no doubt without him they'd be living in a Baniyas slum.

Cook then went on to claim that the club was "like any other business", before using almost every cliché in the book with which adults patronise children; I was almost expecting him to accuse the press of showing off and being overtired. After talking of "a process of change that we've all had to go through", he then majored on his "disappointment" – as though this was somehow chastising to one and all – before asserting that the matter was closed, simply because he said it was.

But even then, he wasn't done:

"What has made this club very angry is the misinterpretation of our statement. We are so incensed by the misinterpretation that we plan to re-issue the statement again [sic]".

Issue the statement again? By jove, that is quite some fury, so let that be a warning to the world; mess with City at your peril.

Comments

Posted by Anonymous on 12/24/2009

A very disappointing result indeed. I feel like fergie has a stubborn tendency to switch things up too late when his plans just dont work. This can be said for the 3-5-2 as well as for trying to prove Owens credentials. And as a life long manutd fan i don't know if scholes inadequecy at every and any aspect of the game made me sentimentally sad or just plain angry. What hurts the most is how much fulham derserved the result, "the champions" looked absolutely pathetic, the defense so slow, narrow and tactically incompetent they made bobby zamora look like ibrahimovic.
On the other issue, for some reason I feel personally let down by Hughes sacking. Not only did I think he was doing quite well, I was a fan of his no nonsense attitude and ambition and for such a stand up guy he did not deserve to be treated like a piece of sh*t, an easily replaceable capital asset. I truly feel for him, and what football has unfortunately become.

Posted by Mike on 12/25/2009

All those words and no real analysis. I didn't learn a single thing about the Fulham match besides the fact that a 3-5-2 doesn't work. Riveting.

I get it, you're a Manchester United fan. For those of us that aren't however, this blog post is more or less a waste of time.

Posted by wayne on 12/26/2009

Mike you are only half correct; its true that the author of this garbage blog writes in a most incoherent manner, which could only be explained by the remainder of whatever it was that he was taking to forget the way fulham embarrassed manchester, however, mike you shouldn't so easily buy into what this guy has to say about the usefulness of the 3-5-2. First, you have to consider the context of the team selection; Fergie has two strong forwards healthy for the 1st time in a month, at the same time he has no central backs and has to scrounge up some big dudes from the midfield to play there. Second, the 3-5-2 calls for 2 defensive mids, 2 wings, and an attacking midfielder; this is a pretty defensive mid-field setup and it accomodates the best United performers- giggs, scholes, and anderson. Daniel Harris should really be blaming his team's lack of depth in defensive midfield forcing scholes to play there and we all know that he's one of the worst tacklers out there

Posted by femi on 12/26/2009

I agree with Mike. I usually love reading this blog a I am a Man U fan. Apparently like most Man U fans, Daniel was confused following the hammering at Fulham and resorted to gibberish talk.....don't worry Dan, your coherency will return.
I try to trust fergie but he is prone to mistakes like anyone else. He really messed up in that last game. Anyone watching the EPL know Fulham are one the teams with a good home form, so our approach should have been conservative rather than experimental more so with our problems in defence (like Daniel pointed out).
Paul Scholes is losing it. Fergie to recognise when Scholesy is having an off day and correct things fast on such occasions.
Thankfully we are still in it. Another striker in the transfer window will be welcome as Berbatov and Owen are not lethal enough.
I think Sparky had to go but I don't think Mancini is any better.
This is probably our best chance to beat Milan in the CL....get it right Fergie!

Posted by Medubi on 12/26/2009

I quite agree with you, Wayne. Most people are looking past the fact that United had NO centre backs to call on that day, Craven Cottage has been quite slippery for them in the recent past anyway.
Isn't it funny how everyone is so quick to attack the old man with such vitriol as soon as the team hits a bad spell, or is going through some sort of transition? They start to say, oh maybe he's getting too old for this, we need a younger manager, more dynamic, he's losing it......
Then he just goes right ahead to win three league titles in a row, and a European Cup. That's all.

As far as the Premiership goes, there isn't a manager hungrier than Fergie out there. A lot of them half his age or so. He's built some of the best teams we've ever seen, created some of the best players we ever will see. Single handedly knocked that other Red mob off their lofty perch.

So there's a bad spell now. Pah. To the gallows with the old bugger.

Posted by fc united fan on 12/26/2009

analysis? its a blog.....
What part of we were sh*te didn't you get?
Dan the tanning bit made me laugh.
Still dont get why your still after not giving owen the benefit of the doubt though, he was as bad as the rest at fulham.

i wonder when Roony's failings will become more apparent?

Posted by A on 12/28/2009

"Theres a reason why nobody plays 3-5-2 anymore..." . Really? I seem to remember both Genoa and Napoli playing it almost exclusively, and with success- both in results and in style. The problem isn't with the formation, it's with the fact that most defenders aren't used to playing it. Pundits like yourself see a side like Man U experiment with 3 at the back for one or two games and when it doesn't come off, blame it on the system, instead of the people playing it.

Posted by Admir Korjenic on 12/28/2009

A: I think what he meant was that most teams dont play three at the back, and that there is a reason for that. Although those teams you pointed to had success with the formation, how many have not had success with it?

Anywyas, it doesnt really matter, because we got three new points today and Vidic is back. Thank God.

Posted by Freewayrick on 12/28/2009

Does the writer of this piece actually get paid for his half-assed opinions? Mancini not a step up from Hughes? Right, Hughes' managerial cv contains what? Making Blackburn a difficult side to beat domestically? What else? Mancini did at least the same at Lazio while also reaching the Last stages of the Uefa cup. He then won repeat scuddetto's at Inter. As for your specious claim that his titles there weren't "legitimate", perhaps I'll remind you that the team he built was largely the same one which won titles for Mourinho. At Inter, he left one of the most balanced, organized squads in Europe. Hughes, meanwhile, couldn't even do that most basic of coaching duties- organize the defense. He made numerous failed signings and lost control of his dressing room. He was a complete and utter failure at City. To compare Mancini to Hughes shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN