ESPN Soccernet - On The Road
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
RSS feed
On The Road
Posted by Daniel Harris on 12/05/2009

To paraphrase Verbal Kint, the greatest trick that debt ever pulled was convincing the world it didn’t exist. Those who did believe in it were treated as cranks by the vast majority of those in the game and in the media, until the incontrovertible evidence of ticket prices rocketing in inverse proportion to transfer market spending left them looking decidedly Michael Fishy.

- On-pitch matters set up Tevez test

For those unfamiliar with great British weather forecasters, Michael Fish was the man who on October 15th 1987 told us the following: “Earlier on today, apparently, a woman rang the BBC and said she heard there was a hurricane on the way; well, if you’re watching, don’t worry, there isn’t”.

As it turned out, there was – the worst in almost 300 years – and following the sudden cancellation of the transfer to United of Serbian youngster Adem Ljajic, residents of M16 would do well to brace themselves for a storm.

Quite simply, aborting the deal makes sense only against a backdrop of severe financial difficulty. The official line is that there’s a coterie of “top young talent” already at the club, in the “attacking midfielder” position, but in fact nothing could be further from the case; along with pace up front, this is the single most glaring aspect in which the current squad is lacking.

If Ljajic is anywhere near as good as he’s meant to be – as good, say, as United thought he was a year ago, when they also thought there was a need for a player of his type – then this excuse is even more of a nonsense. He may not have progressed as expected, but United were undeterred from buying Gabriel Obertan last summer, despite a season far less auspicious than Ljajic’s.

There are, of course, two differences; price and economy. Starting with the former. Obertan cost £3 million, Ljajic between three and four times that. The apologists will say that he isn’t worth it, and maybe he isn’t, but that misses the point. This is Manchester United we’re talking about: the most popular club in the world, during one of the most successful periods in its history, in the aftermath of the most profitable summer any team has ever enjoyed, at a time when unimaginable riches are sloshing around the top end of the game; if they have to pay a premium, so what? If the player flops, so what?

In defence of this parsimony, the club preached that in the current market, it was impossible to obtain value for money, hilariously expecting people not to fathom the identity of the most significant beneficiaries of this cursed inflation. For years, Fergie has moaned about the United tax added to the value of any player, before quite rightly paying the necessary - and in the days of Kenyonomics, often necessary plus a bit more. Now, suddenly, he expects us to believe in him as ideologue crusader, acting for the benefit of the footballing community.

It’s not that I want United to chuck money around for its own sake – there’s something very vulgar about using financial might, even when legitimately earned, to liberate talent nurtured by others as soon as convenient. But if absolutely required, the money through the turnstiles demands the need be met, even if it costs more than it should. Instead, though, we’re told about United’s proud reputation for developing young players, something the club used to do because it’s important, but now does because there’s no other choice.

The arrival of this time – always likely given the aggressive tenets of the takeover – has been hastened by the economy. Ljajic had been budgeted for a year ago, and the club applied for a work permit as recently as October; it seems very much as though United expected to make the payment.

Their sudden inability to do so illustrates the effrontery of the “top young talent” excuse, as it’s impossible anyone has rendered years of scouting worthless by having a good couple of months - however well Cleverley’s doing at Watford. I’d suggest the real reason the deal has been pulled is that the recession has hit the Glazers harder than they’re letting on; either a planned refinancing is no longer possible, or they require the Ljajic money for something else; perhaps both.

Frighteningly, that something else needn’t have anything to do with United – the Glazers are free to siphon cash out of the club and into any interest of theirs that needed it; verily money ain’t got no owners, only spenders. And who knows what they might do next time they need some capital?

Meanwhile, Fergie – who unforgivably welcomed the Glazers in the first place, even though his opposition could probably have kyboshed the plan – skives his weekly press conference, safe in the knowledge that he can be boozing and spieling a merry retirement by the time we’re in real trouble, probably around the period Ljajic fulfils his potential.

It’s possible that Ljajic will turn out to be another Celio Silva, and United go on to spend the money on a better, similar player. But until they do, the evidence does not look good. Promoting himself – sorry, I mean England’s World Cup bid – the other day, David Beckham referred to the Premier League as “the most exposed in the world”. However you interpret it, he’s not wrong.

Comments

Posted by abector on 12/05/2009

You say united are having a financial crisis fair enough, but I dont think you should even hint that SAF does not care about the future as he will retire by then. He has spent most of his career with this club and there is a sense of loyalty he and the club have for each other. 2 seasons ago united spent close to 60M pounds on 3 players nani anderson and hargreaves. Of which only anderson has come close to doing any good for the club. Cant blame hargreaves he is injured but an important player when fit and Nani is out of form and favor while we know what happened with tevez. So it is fair to say united might be a little cautious when spending money in the future and just dont feel ljajic is worth the investment

Posted by Angelo on 12/05/2009

Daniel - I too am a little concerned we have let an opportunity go to strengthen our midfield with a young, attacking midfielder the likes of which United simply do not possess at this time. I believe the reason is surely financial, and rumours in other sections of the press that we plan to let Tosic go as well are unsettling. Their explanation that Llajic has not progressed as they liked simply seems a smokescreen. In this economy, 10 million for a starlet isn't an extravagant price, and one United would have never balked at before. I fear the sky may be falling and the success United has had over the last few years has blinded many supporters to that fact.

Posted by P Balfour on 12/05/2009

I can't believe this article! Daniel Harris is reduced to personal insults about a man that can be credited for making Manchester United the most successful club since the Premiership began. Around Old Trafford they may be a sense that we don’t have the spending power to keep up with Chelsea, Man City and Real. But we are still very competitive and in agreement with the writer we have earned our status though a successful history. I feel the fans could write a book on how the glazers treat us, but isn't that the same with most clubs?

Posted by Halim on 12/05/2009

Oh come on, Daniel! Had you been the one who owns Manchester United, and buying a player 3x more expensive without being 3x better, in a squad with heavy competition for attacking midfield, and involving your own money.....you would have taken the same decision.

Posted by mars on 12/05/2009

I don't think this really makes any sense at all. Man Utd do have an abundance of up and coming talent in the same mould as Ljajic. I don't see why SAF will want to spend 10 mil on Ljajic. He could easily top that up and get someone else, better and more established like David Silva. So before coming to conclusions that Man Utd is coughing up an excuse for its debts, I rather take the word of the club at face value. The youth system is churning out great talents versatile and well-schooled in the Man Utd style of play; there is simply no need to spend 10 mil on someone unproven from a less than convinving league. Why is that so hard to believe?

Posted by mh on 12/05/2009

i find it hard to believe what your trying to say here. i think its easier to believe that something went wrong with the work permit or maybe United actually believe that their youth products are just as good then the idea of the glaziers funneling money out of the team. why is it that when united decide not to buy someone these days it is automatically attributed to financial debt, they are not required to splash out huge amounts of money every transfer window are they? maybe the kid just is not worth the 10 million after all, is that not possible? I totally agree with abector, after the money spent on 3 players, with only anderson playing more then a camio role, i think United is just being a bit more cautious when spending their money.

Posted by Brian on 12/05/2009

this a ridiculous article epitomized by the statement that Fergie will merely be boozing by the time united have to worry about economic difficulties. have you been following any news lately? Fergie has just passionately defended and continued to develop the next crop of youngsters most of whom will only reach their full potential until long after fergie retires. Next time, before you write an article about united, get your head out of your arse and show that you have at least a minuscule understanding of the club and its staff.

Posted by Josh on 12/05/2009

you are a goof

Posted by frank on 12/05/2009

you must be kidding,we have more then enough young talent that we are developing at this moment and only arsenal has more. this young man might be good but there is many great young players from brasil on the horizon that we will be going after when carlos comes back from his stint with portugal.the only player that saf should considering right now is pato. i seem to remenber the glazers were the only serious players when the team was available,they are very good at everything they do,believe me i know,i live in florida myself and unlike most other big financiers they are respect, i know, you choice would have been a russian or italian mobster or some arabian shiek who would lose interest in the team after a few years, please stop your american bashing and about saf boozing already you sound like a bunch of fools.

Posted by Panda on 12/06/2009

I agree and even Fergies reluctance to use the Ronaldo money properly at least some of it seemed strange to me. Although I want to think that the Glazers are more professional and work for the clubs interest as weve seen them put out serious money for berbatov etc. theyve never been in charge when Man Utd havent looked the best team in the premier league. I think they are in some sort of crisis and Ferguson has been hiding it to the media for a long time now. And I dont agree that SAF would not care for the clubs future after his retirement.

Posted by kyle on 12/06/2009

this article is pathetic

Posted by united in trouble? on 12/06/2009

I also feel that united might be in a little bit of financial trouble. But i also think that this january we will spend money. Nani should be sold to help ease any financial trouble as obertan has proved his worth. Ljajic is a player ive never seen play and 10 million seems like alot of money for a player that is not guaranteed to perform well. Tosic is a player we spent equal money on and has still yet to make an impact. We have great young attacking players in obertan, anderson, tosic, wellbeck, and the signing of Valencia seems more and more genius after every game. Sir Alex will buy the right players for uniteds future before he rides off in the sunset as the greatest manager of all time. Well done Sir Alex! We want Dzeko

Posted by Tufty on 12/06/2009

Given that United have 7 or 8 better young midfield players in the under 18's than Llajic, does it make any sense to actually sign him?
Not all these players will break through, given the limited places available. Speak to any of the coaches at the academy and they will tell you tht The likes of Pogba,Morison, Coffe, Pertucci, Erikem have all shown that they are ahead of Llajic.
Its funny how people can rave about a new signing, how they can get excited, especially in the case of a player such as Llajic, one who most fans have probably seen no more than a few youtube clips off, the like that Dennis Wise uses to sign players for Keegan and we all know how that ended up.
Llajic himself hasnt excactly been the main man for Partizan this season in a lague that Tosic looked a world beater in, yet Tosic struggles to cope with the reserve team level.
The judgement on Llajic will come from how his career develops and how that career compares with the likes of morrison etc.

Posted by Anonymous on 12/07/2009

So, according to this article, Llajic is far better than Gibson, Anderson, Hargreaves, Pogba, Erikem and all the other players that are coming through at United? United is simply bankrupt and unable to pay 10 million pounds for a player, when they received 80 million pounds in the summer. Right then.

Posted by Water on 12/07/2009

It may be a financial problem for United.Maybe not.

Some argued that the indebted company is a company in the US. Even if the company breaks, United will not be affected--they are separated companies.

Asset= debt+right of owner?? or something. United is a well-run company making profits. So we don't need excessive concerns.

Posted by Roshan on 12/08/2009

Can't wrap my head around the pessimism and doom-mongering from the author and the posts in this thread. Also difficult to fathom how armchair 'sawker' fans from the States would go wittering as if they knew the ins and outs of this situation. If Fergie wanted to buy someone in the January window who he thought would add a lot to the 1st team, considering that United have a bunch of youngsters that are as good as the ones at both Barca and Arsenal he doesn't really need to spend £10m of his warchest on an 18 year old who is only a little more experienced than United's own booty. What we should be more concerned about though is the slipshod manner in which the transfer was handled and the impetuosity we displayed which would be more becoming of Madrid or Chelsea which was all really bad PR for the club. If we applied for a permit it can't be because we couldn't afford him could it? Pretty sure people will shut up after we win the league and spend £40m of less inflated money.

Posted by vibrrribbon on 12/09/2009

trust Fergie...

Posted by Jojo on 12/10/2009

As usual ur spot on Dan. These guys are so blinded by United's recent success and loyalty to fergie that they fail to see the obvious.The Glazer takeover was a big mistake and United will pay for years to come so brace yourselves the clouds are beginning to gather.

Posted by ben on 12/11/2009

enjoying the blog mate. how long do you reckon before City make a bid for Ljajic...

Posted by NAthan on 12/14/2009

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN