ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Manchester City
soccernet blog
Manchester City
Posted by Wallace Poulter on 12/17/2011

I know, I know, on the surface it seems an odd question. Richards isn't City's best player, that would be David Silva, or the most influential, no guesses for Nigel de Jong, but a recent reader question got me thinking about City's tactics in breaking down defenses.

Football games at the very highest level are rarely about the quality of the players. Certainly individual skill has its place and can create moments of brilliance. However given that the relative quality of the players is fairly even, as long as you have enough of them, strategy and tactics and the ability of the players to implement them is crucial to the outcome of a game.

This is why we talk so often about formations and whether the manager got his selections correct not to mention the in game changes. Obviously if all it took to get a team back into a game was a good old rollicking at half time all managers would yell at the players before the match to get a head start.

There are of course numerous ways to set up for a game tactically. The most obvious is the counter-attack, absorbing the opponents attack until a move breaks down and then counter-attack with pace. City have done a good job of this in recent years under a number of managers not the least it is a tactic that can be used to great effect against better teams. Now with the burden of talent it is City that must generally make the run of play looking for the break through, rather than the mistake that leads to the oppositions counter attack. It's here that in many ways, Yaya Toure, Gareth Barry and James Milner are their most valuable - not turning the ball over and reducing the opportunities for the other side.

But how to break open a team that has "parked the bus" or shown a healthy desire not to move forward? Great passing is one way, getting to the by-line another. However City have shown tactically a tendency to overload one area of the pitch, which brings me to Richards.

Do you realize the Richards in still only 23? It just seems like he's been around forever having been capped for England back in 2006 after bursting on the scene the year before. Before Richards settled down at right back, there were spells in the middle of defense partnering Richard Dunne and it was even suggested that the youngster would ultimately move into a Patrick Vieira like role given his ability to surge forward so well. However right back is ultimately where Richards has found a home.

Which is curious in some ways because I'm not convinced Richards is a great defender. Richards has a tendency to wander far too much. City this season have turned this into an asset, but it's the reason Capello keeps failing to call him into the England squad. Let's take the asset first. In City's standard first team, Milner, Silva, Aguero and Balotelli all play. Milner on the left, Silva down the right on defense, but then when City have the ball both Milner and Silva have license to roam. And they do, often down the right combined with Richards marauding forward. When done properly you have Aguero and Balotelli occupying the attention of the central defenders and Milner, Silva and Richards all focused on the space in and around the opposing left back. Even if an opposition midfielder comes back, City still have the tactical advantage of an over lapping Richards. Time and again you see Silva cut inside and then reverse pass to Milner who is in space because the full back has gone with the run of Richards.

Literally the addition of Richards to the attack, from a tactical standpoint, opens up the defense for ultimately Aguero and Balotelli to prosper. Yet City are also extremely fortunate in the current composition of the other teams in the Premier League. Quick, name a world class left winger playing in the league? Is there one? Gareth Bale may be all that there is. There's no one that even resembles say a Peter Barnes in full flight, never mind a truly world class winger getting to the line to make crosses. Which means Richards, and City, have the luxury of not having to worry about defending all the time down that flank.

Europe is different however. I don't think it a coincidence that Pablo Zabaleta was preferred to Richards in four of City's six European ties even taking into his injury for the Bayern game. Here Mancini needed a defender first but in playing Zabaleta, City also lost their cavalier goal scoring capability that has seen them score four goals or more seven times this season. This explains Capello's reluctance. Against international competition, all of whom have quality left sided attackers, Richards instincts would be a liability rather than a strength.

Which brings us to Chelsea on Monday night. Richards didn't play, out with an injury, and City were unable to break open a resilient Chelsea defense as Milner remained on the left and Silva no longer had the passing outlets in the right that have been so successful so far this year.

Micah Richards... City's most important player.

Follow ESPNsoccernetFC on Twitter

Comments

Posted by Jim Kanichirayil-Chicago on 12/17/2011

I'm not sure if I fully buy into the theory but I can't think of an effective counter-argument. Every other player on the squad has their "clone" but there isn't anyone that can do what Richards does. I sometimes wonder why he doesn't play the Yaya role or why he couldn't be played up front in a pinch. He's got a lot of target striker attributes.

Wallace Reply I'd like to see Richards play in Yaya Toure's position at least once or twice to see how he would do

Posted by rodney on 12/17/2011

couldnt agree more with u on this part. no doubt left back and right back now has to be more aggresive in attacking, example would be enrique for liverpool, evra and jones for mu, cole for chelsea.

however, this attacking approach can only be used if the midfielders are good enough to hold the ball possession.

i always enjoy when kolarov attack. he still need to improve on creating goal chances and defending though..

Posted by Tawin on 12/17/2011

Very good, long, and enjoyable read; I'd personally like to see you post more often. You always have interesting insights.

That being said I always love to see Richards bombing forward and providing an outlet or creating a distraction in the opponent's half. City to me looks most dangerous when they orchestrate attacks from the flank and not through the middle where all the players are congested. What do you see is the difference between Richards on that right flank and Kolarov/Clichy on the left in terms of attack?

Wallace Reply Kolarov and Clichy play defense first and attack second, while Richards looks to attack first.

Posted by alen on 12/17/2011

very wel written article. but i disagree.

wen city play without silva they are a different team. completly different identity.

Wallace Reply Silva is the best player in the Premier League as far as I am concerned.

Posted by Jo on 12/17/2011

I had a feeling about Richards being the missing piece to the jigsaw in the Chelsea match but then again I don't think they struggled only because there's the matter of being down to ten men too?

Posted by Waqas Azeem on 12/17/2011

Fascinating thought and a great read. And I do believe in the absence of Richards, Johnson should have been on the pitch at some point in any game. And at Chelsea Dejong was not in the eleven was another over confident move which obviously backfired. But if City have been able to do implement this strategy brilliantly on the right flank, why not do the same on the left? I always see Clichy on his bike going forward? I also think City are not utilizing Dzeko in the right way, ok, he has scored a few and held the ball fairly well; but would love to see Johnson on the left and Milner right whipping in crosses as an alternate tactic, where stretching the field is required or the middle or the park is congested. one more thing I read in the Guardian that Mancini wants Thiago Silva from Milan, but FFP is an issue ? thoughts? and do you think City need another CM?
P.S. you should post more often :)

Wallace Reply Clichy can't cross to save his life. Richards normally drives the ball well across goal.

Re Silva. Last name = great, age (27) = great, position (CB) = great, Brazilian = not so great...

Posted by KD on 12/17/2011

No problem with the logic Wallace, makes a lot of sense. But think back to the Tottenham game when indeed Bale did play and Mancini favoured Zabaleta presumably to negate the attacking threat. Before Micah came on, City were already 4-0 up. Maybe one caveat to that match was that is was Nasri's first for City (picked ahead of Milner), and in his impressive debut, his movement in that game matched Silva's. His dip in form since may be blamed on him not finding a suitable role in the team, but don't you think City still have the ability to unlock defences if they can harness that formula again?

Wallace Reply I think City just caught Spurs cold that day. Even with Nasri on his best form I don't think City repeat that scoreline.

Posted by HonestJohn on 12/18/2011

Gervinho isn't world class but he does seem to get to the byline frequently.

Wallace Reply Watch Gervinho today against City. He gave some excellent effort in chasing loose balls and got to the by-line at least twice but rarely was heard from.

Posted by Arndt Kubosch on 12/18/2011

Hi, Wallace!

I've been reading your stuff for a while, and I really like it. I was wondering if I could have your take one the following:

I compiled a table of the top 6 contenders for this year's PL title and their matches against each other.

Man. U. are top with 10 points from 5 games
Liverpool are second with 8 from 5 games
Man. C. are third with 7 from 4
The remaining 3 teams, Spurs, Arsenal and Chelsea have 6 pointer from 4 games.

What makes this interesting however are where the games have been played. City's 4 games are all away games, while 4 out of United's 5 are at home.

I have a feeling the PL will be to some extent be decided by how the teams do in these games, and that makes me quite optimistic of City's chances. What do you think?

Wallace Reply Interesting. Normally these games even out over the season. It's the dropped points against a Fulham, Stoke or Wigan that usually decide things. But still, interesting.

Posted by Waqas Azeem on 12/18/2011

On a side note:
Wallace, John Guidetti has now scored 11 goals in as many appearances for Feyenoord.

Wallace Reply Yeah I was reading that and planning to watch a replay of the Twente match to see how he's doing.

Posted by Marty on 12/19/2011

Sorry, Arndt, but 7 points from 4 games is better than 8 from 5, simple fractions there. Besides, City's matches against the top 6, with the exception of Arsenal, have all been on the road, so it's not exactly a fair comparison.

Posted by Hankinsohl on 12/19/2011

An interesting perspective on Richards... City does seem more potent when he plays.

Regarding Thiago Silva - every time I've seen him play he's been arguably better than Vidic; I think Thiago would do quite well in the EPL (do Brazilian defenders also struggle to adapt the the English game?). Perhaps some sort of Tevez/Silva swap can be arranged.

I'm interested in your take on Mancini's starting lineup today. Were Nasri and Kolo Toure started for purely tactical reasons or was there, perhaps, a bit of psychology at work, starting the ex-Arsenal players to get a reaction from the Gunners?

Wallace Reply I think the latter. There's no way Nasri starts based on his recent form.

Posted by Butler on 12/19/2011

I'd love to hear why you think that City's most imporatant player is De Jong right now. Last season, definitely. But now the philosophy has shifted. City is not looking to park the bus against ANY team, and frankly, De Jong's games this season haven't always resulted in a clean sheet.
Of course, I still like him. But our most imporatnat player right now is Silva, without a doubt. When he doesn't perform, neither does our offense. I suppose that's whywe bought Nasri, but still

Wallace Reply I have a nagging suspicion that City will somewhat rue the way they have played so far this season. I know that sounds strange, but there are times against the top clubs when they are going to need de Jong and he's not going to be in top form. City are winning currently because they usually overwhelm their opponents - the Keegan philosophy. I honestly think that teams are afraid of City at the moment and playing that way, but the first club that isn't and plays down the middle is going to surprise the heck out of the team.

Posted by Tawin on 12/19/2011

I'm going to comment again and just say that I am very worried about City at the moment. Even though they are winning there are many times that teams, recently Chelsea and Arsenal, attacked straight through the middle in the counter attack and Barry and Yaya Toure just couldn't do much, leaving only the two center-backs and maybe Richards or Clichy/Zabaleta against 3 attackers. If they had taken their chances they would have killed us on the counter.

Wallace Reply It's a balance between the attacking style we see this season and placing de Jong in the way which is what Mancini did last year.

Posted by MCFCBoy on 12/20/2011

Future City captain right there IMO.

But coming back to an old topic, City still aren't strong enough defensively. Our glut of goals scored and swift attacking play have taken focus away from our frail defense.
Komapny and Lescott still look unsettled without De Jong in front of them. As you said, Richards and Kolarov/Clichy aren't good enough defensively to deal with the best wingers which means that sooner or later, we will get caught out.
Would love to see an Abidal or Heinze type player in at left back to provide some stability on one flank and move across to a 3 man defense when Richards bombs forward and when De Jong isn't playing.

Wallace Reply It's this reason why I don't believe City will win the league this year. One player away from it though.

Posted by Aashu on 12/20/2011

I do agree that Micah adds another dimension to the City attack when he is in the team. However his defending needs to improve.

Any thoughts on what formation Mancini will adopt in the absence of Yaya Toure during the Africa tournament. Would Nigel Jong get his chance then?

Wallace Reply I'd like to see Milner move inside and Johnson get his chance.

Posted by Stan on 12/21/2011

Good column, Wallace. Micah Richards the most important player? I'm sure you'd get plenty of argument on that, but I remember being sorely disappointed he wasn't available for the Chelsea match for just the reasons you mentioned - he's so disruptive to an opponent's defensive tactics.

Also, I agree with you about the rusting of De Jong. We've needed his steel in defense, and it just hasn't been utilized.

Posted by Ste on 12/21/2011

Interesting article to produce with the game tonight coming up.
Etherington is far from world class but does have a knack for producing quality from wide and, perhaps more importantly, the players in the middle to finish the deliveries. I also remember the trouble Crouch caused us for Tottenham in the Champs League decider 18 months ago (where he was man of the match in my opinion) so all in all I am nervous about the potential result.
I guess we will see if Richards helps or hinders things in about 5 hours time.

Posted by David on 12/22/2011

Wally,

Didn't get to watch the Stoke match, but I read that Cameron Jerome was actually man-marking Richards. Did you see it this way? And if so have you ever seen a right back being man-marked like that? Seems Tony Pulis may be reading your articles!

Posted by sanel osmanovic on 12/26/2011

Have you guys noticed that since edin dzeko has been playing only about 15 mins at the most of every game city has been struggling alot. Balatolli has anger issues he can't control the ball like dzeko does. Why not bring it back to the way it was from the beginning of the league. Think about it man city coach before you end up losing again and again.

Wallace Reply Yeah I'd actually like to see Dzeko to start more often. He and Aguero have a good connection.

Posted by Brendan Murray on 12/31/2011

I think that Mancini is blind to start Lescott instead of of a hungrier player. Vincent Kompany needs SOME assistance my thoughts are to move micah richards to center back and try to by some young left back and right back.

Wallace Reply Lescott has played well this year. I think to a certain extent that the club have become blind to Kompany's reputation from last year when as I have noted it was the play of Kompany combined with de Jong that elevated Kompany to the level where he was talked about as one of the best centre halves in the Premier League. Richards play well there a couple of years ago but had Hamann playing virtually the same role as de Jong. Hence my call the past two years for City to sign a true world class defender.

Posted by Wiz on 01/23/2012

Interesting read mate, just one nagging question: Who on earth is this Peter Barnes you mention?

Wallace Reply Great winger for City and West Brom in the 70's.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Wallace Poulter Wallace Poulter is an award winning video game producer, designer, industry consultant and writer. He has been a football fanatic since the day he moved in next door to Brian Clough. "Cloughie" being the acknowledged genius that he was promptly moved out and went to manage Derby. A serviceable senior school left-back in his youth, Poulter played one season of Sunday league football as a striker proving conclusively that he was a serviceable senior school left-back! Today Poulter remains involved with football as a licensed referee and most recently as a consultant on a Football MMO.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives