ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Manchester City
soccernet blog
Manchester City
Posted by Wallace Poulter on 09/08/2010

Teamwork, especially on the football field, is an over looked factor. Players take time to gel. Sometimes an understanding develops quickly, but usually this is not the case. It was therefore gratifying to see England Manager Fabio Capello make the decision to partner Joleon Lescott with Phil Jagielka in the Euro 2012 game against Switzerland in Basel. I'll freely admit that Bolton's Gary Cahill is probably a better player individually, but Capello took into account that Lescott and Jagielka had played together at Everton and would be more likely to combine effectively.

I have in the past despaired at the selection decisions made by successive England managers. Time after time the same old regular, and obvious, starting 11 is picked; one that, frankly, most England fans could pick in their sleep. It's as if playing this same team together every game will make England better. It doesn't for one simple fact. When it comes to any international tournament there are always without exception at least a couple of players who are injured and/or suspended. Suddenly a new untried player is thrown into the mix or a previous squad member with virtually no experience in the starting 11 is expected to seamlessly slot into place.

And it fails. Every time.

Surely the smarter way to play is to presume that such injuries and suspensions will occur and treat international friendlies as a testing ground for additional player tinkering?

Play the first 25 minutes of a friendly with the starting 11. This gives the regulars a good run out and also keeps a positive relationship with the Premier League managers. Then come up with scenarios of injury and suspension and experiment.

What happens if John Terry and Ashley Cole are injured? Would it be better for example in that specific circumstance to drop Duran Duran's inspiration (hereafter DDI) and play Jagielka, Lescott and Leighton Baines? I'm well aware that Baines did not perform well prior to the World Cup, but would a familiar group of players have improved that performance?

Or would DDI work well in a partnership with Jagielka with Lescott at Left Back? Maybe Cahill works better with DDI and Jagielka sits on the bench even though he is the better player? I don't know and the point is neither does Capello or any other previous England manager because they didn't take the opportunity to plan in a real game.

England have suffered at the last two World Cups because of injuries to David Beckham and Wayne Rooney. That Santa Claus was off his game in South Africa should come as no surprise given the recent revelations, but it also appears that the star striker of Real Madrid's feeder club was less than match fit.

Unless an England squad is truly a squad with inter changeable parts that can be brought in as needed, then England will always suffer disappointment at the international level. The Premier League is the "best" league in the world we are constantly told. Well.... yes, top to bottom I agree although both la Liga and Serie A are pretty good. However the Premier League does seem to be the hardest on players week in and week out and it is here that Italy, Spain, Germany and Holland seem to hold the advantage at international level. The majority of their top players, with the exception of the Dutch, play in their own leagues.

There is, consequently, less wear and tear on their non Premier League players when the international tournaments are played at the end of the year.

England's only hope is to build a squad that truly works as one combined unit. The decision to play Jagielka and Lescott together is one small step in the correct direction. That was a partnership that worked at Everton. It could do so again for England and allow England to know with confidence how they would replace DDI and John Terry should the situation of both being unavailable occur in the future.

England ended up experimenting in a game that counted and won 3-1. Ultimately the result is all that mattered, but it would be beneficial in future international friendlies for England to start to anticipate such injuries. This is also an argument for England playing regular B internationals for similar reasons. Only by practicing these situations can England be properly prepared.


Comments

Posted by Jobbie33 on 09/08/2010

What is your thought on Barry & Gerrard partnership in the middle? Everyone knows that Gerrard's best position is in the middle and he've proved it time and time again. And with Adam Johnson forcing his way through the rank, Lampard might find it hard to get back into the team.

Wallace Reply It is unfortunate that Lampard and Gerrard essentially play the same position, but one has to start and the other has to be on the bench. It's been a mistake made for years to try and play them in the same team.

Posted by Rowan on 09/08/2010

Absolutely agree.

To be fair, Capello did try to do this on at least one occasion at the WC: he initially went with Carragher instead of Upson to replace DDI, I think because he figured Carra and Johnson (at RB) would have a better understanding. Unfortunately, Carra is too slow to cover Terry, so it didn't work. This is precisely the type of combination-problem you're talking about, and you're right, experimentation is needed.

On the plus side, I think it will benefit England immensely to have Milner and Adam Johnson playing together a lot for City. I think their understanding will be a lethal weapon: they can both change flanks well, they're complementarily-footed (Milner R and Johnson L), and they offer sufficiently different strengths (Milner's athleticism and power to Johnson's craft and finesse) to cause FBs absolute nightmares.

Of course, that assumes that Milner is not needed at CM, which I think he might be once Gerrard gets too old - though Jack Wilshere might do it too.

Posted by Chris on 09/08/2010

I think Gerrard is far superior to Lampard. He is a better all around player. I dont think Lampard should be in the starting 11. If when tournament time comes around and it's basically the same starting 11 as we saw in South Africa then England are doomed. They should stick with this team and I would even be looking to add even more young talent.

Posted by Helgi on 09/08/2010

Its amazing that no one in the last 10 years has been able to put together a good England team together. I feel though that players like Lescott, Johnson, Milner, Defoe etc. who are playing outside the traditional top 4 clubs will be just as good now and England will have more depth to the squad. They are still defending badly but Hart seems good.

Posted by Cody on 09/08/2010

Silly capello! walcott would've never gotten injured in the first place had he started AJ like he should've. I'm sorry but adam johnson is clearly one of the 3 best players on the squad the way he has been playing and continues to play.

Posted by Danial on 09/09/2010

Manchester City - "Ruining" football & The Three Lions since 2008.

Posted by Nico on 09/09/2010

Spot on. Note how England is much more fluent without Lampard in midfield?

Team work is the way england needs to go.

The ManCity english core and players who are just totally grateful to be there have provided a good base on which "star" players like Rooney and Gerrard can flourish.

However too many "stars" only makes a galaxy and not a team.

Posted by yewjhin on 09/09/2010

" but it also appears that the star striker of Real Madrid's feeder club was less than match fit. "

Thinly veiled attack on your rivals, eh?

Wallace Reply Attack? No. Jab? Yes...

Posted by someone on 09/09/2010

Nico "However too many "stars" only makes a galaxy and not a team."

Real Madrid's galactico era.

Posted by Ucok on 09/09/2010

Truly spot on.
Instead of trying to play Gerrard and Lampard together, England should be grateful that they have the quality of either Gerrard or Lampard to call up on from the bench.
From current form though, I'd start with Gerrard.
And to add to that, I think Gerrard should be given the permanent captaincy.
No disrespect to Ferdinand, but I think he's been to injury prone in the last 2 years or so.

Posted by arthy on 09/09/2010

stevie g and frank lampard are 2 world class players but let the truth be said they play the same position and that z wer the problem z n midfield,i rate stevie g beta than lampard so he shud sit out n warm the bench

Posted by nimo on 09/09/2010

What you mean " only makes a galaxy and not a team".
Funny mate. Not agree. Season is long way to go.
I want to bet with you. 100% believe. Man-City will do very good this season.
How do think Wallace?

Wallace Reply I don't think City make the Champions League this season. However this team, plus one additional defender, after playing together for a year would be a true Championship contender. But they have to become a team first. Until they do, United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs are much better and Liverpool too if they can shake their injury bug.

Posted by mickeysoo on 09/09/2010

I heard you saying that one of lampard and gerrard should sit on the bench when the other is playing.had you been capello who you would have liked to sit on the bench.i havent seen lampard play without gerrard in the England national team but i have seen gerrard without lampard and without wanting to prejudice your decision i will leave things to you.
I feel that a player like adam johnson should start considering the consistency he's shown when given the chance and in as much as i hate to admit it theo walcott should be more of an impact substitute than a starter.i will really like to see both milner and johnson on the flanks than any other combination.though jagielka,lescott,cahill and dawson are good i think it will be foolhardy to start any of them ahead of john terry when he is fit.

Wallace Reply I'm not a fan of John Terry, wasn't even before the recent issues. He's lost a step and without a Defensive Midfielder in front of him that causes trouble. At age 24, Jagielka is probably a better bet to start to build the defense around.

I'm a big fan of Frank Lampard, more so than Gerrard. To me it honestly doesn't matter, either one is very good but the edge goes to Gerrard because I feel he should be the Captain of the side. If injured or suspended then Lampard is an incredible replacement coming off the bench.

Posted by Aless on 09/09/2010

I'd just like to mention that England also have their majority players playing in their own league, just like the Dutch, Italians and Spanish. I might agree to some extent that the Premier League is more physical than any other, hence more physical depletion.

It's really unfortunate that Walcott got injured specifically at this time. He was just establishing himself, with mighty form, for Arsenal and now England. I feel he's developed enough. Look at his interviews now. Even that's changed. But to have a replacement available like Adam Johnson is a luxury for Capello. He's one of those rare old-fashioned wingers. You can feel the immediate threat he posses once the ball falls at his feet.

I believe England are now playing like a team, something they've struggled to do until now. They've struggled to string so much talent into a workable starting IX, but I feel that might have changed. Or is it England crumble when its time to matter, when its tournament time.

Wallace Reply In some ways Walcott's injury is "fortunate" for Capello in that it was becoming obvious that as good as the Arsenal youngster's form is, that Adam Johnson should be starting. That will now be the case, although I wish Walcott a speedy recovery.

I think the argument can be made that Terry, Ferdinand and Lampard should not come back into the team, but rather this team is one to build upon. It's not perfect by any means, not least Lescott although I do like the partnership aspect of working with Jagielka again, however the 4-4-1-1 with Rooney playing free is a good one.

The temptation with Milner suspended for the next game will be to bring Johnson in for Walcott and put Gerrard out on the left in place of Milner with Lampard restored to the middle. No, no, a thousand times no.

England should look for a different left wing/midfield player and resist the temptation to move Gerrard from where he is playing. Funnily enough I'm not going to suggest Joe Cole, but rather one of the three Villa youngsters would be a better choice.

England have I feel found a team that they can build upon.

Posted by Trevor on 09/09/2010

If egoistic and selfish players like John Terry and Frank Lampard were injured before the World Cup, England might have actually progressed further.

Soccer is a team game. Show-off players like these two should be benched even if they are not injured.

Posted by kelechinnorom on 09/09/2010

i can hear all of you well,lampard is too old,hv you all forgotten so soon how he carried this team during the world cup,spain play with three midfielders,and a true holding midfielder in busquet,england play with barry a true CM,not a dm,how do u want it to work,who breaks up the attack,when lamps and gerrad bomb forward,none,geradd might be a better all round player,but in the whole universe there is no better goal scoring midfielder than him,20 guaranteed every year,let me ask u all,is he a player to sit on the bench,drop him and wait till england play a strong opposition like spain,brazil,where gerrad has no spaceto pull his strings from midfield,thats is where u need lampard,he is a player for the big stage,maybe he should retire for england to see his importance,check out paul scholes a lot of rubbish was said,drop him for lamp,just 6yrs ago

Posted by Bombardier on 09/10/2010

Agreed. Capello rotating Jagielka, Lescott, Upson and old Ferdinand and Terry should elminate the oh-so-frequent CB injury panic that ruins most teams.

Also Johnson, Gerrard, Barry and Milner should start, with Lampard, Walcott (best impact substitute in the world) and Wilshere as plan B would work wonders in my opinion. Wright-Phillips is definitely out of place though.

Posted by Simon on 09/10/2010

These are good suggestions, but I think at the heart of it, it's purely a matter of technique. All those countries mentioned -- Spain, Italy, Germany, Holland, France, etc. -- stress technique over anything at youth levels, whereas I think in England it's more about physicality, endurance, things which make the Premier League such an abrasive, powerful league. I was born in France and played on a youth academy team there when I was a kid, and I can't tell you how much time was dedicated to ball skills.

It's no wonder then that England's hopes have always relied on their most technical players -- Gascoigne, Beckham, Rooney for instance, so imagine having a team with 4 Rooneys in it. That's what it's like on the continent. Juan Mata and Cesc Fabregas can't get a game for Spain, but I'm sure they'd just walk into the England national team. England need to tweak their approach a little, and strike the right balance between traditional English values and continental ones.

Posted by soon on 09/10/2010

I like the Jack Wilshere comment. In depth. But when Gerrard is old, Rooney should be in that position with crounch and defoe in front. Milner is not comfortable on the ball yet, not like a Xavi or Ineista, who would never give the ball away. Rooney is close to that.

All said, the real problem with England in WC is that the "engine" is injured and came back unfit. Nobody wins the WC without a good defensive mid. Tom Huddlestone is one to bring up.

Posted by Joel Beresford on 09/11/2010

Totally agree and was screaming at the box during the World Cup. Only it was the other end i was screaming about.

With Rooney injured ( or just out of form ) why on earth would you stick with a pairing of Rooney and Heskey. Let's be honest Heskey is rubbish, really don't care for the "He holds the ball up well" Arguement or he's Strong in the air".

2 players out of form yet Capello had no interest in changing what he thought was best. Now when you consider he had Defoe and Crouch at his disposal. Both goal scorers, both had great years, both play together, both scored goals together in the same Spurs team all year ( that's right the 1 that broke into the top 4).

Take nothing away from Capello he surely knows more than me ... But, that just seemed such an obvious choice. Hell it's not like we could have done any worse!

Posted by blogs.soccernet.com on 04/09/2011

Lescott_get_deserved_england_c.. Awful :)

Wallace Reply My reservations about Lescott are long standing and were expressed even before City bought the defender. My point was that it was the right move given the circumstances.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Wallace Poulter Wallace Poulter is an award winning video game producer, designer, industry consultant and writer. He has been a football fanatic since the day he moved in next door to Brian Clough. "Cloughie" being the acknowledged genius that he was promptly moved out and went to manage Derby. A serviceable senior school left-back in his youth, Poulter played one season of Sunday league football as a striker proving conclusively that he was a serviceable senior school left-back! Today Poulter remains involved with football as a licensed referee and most recently as a consultant on a Football MMO.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives