ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Manchester City
soccernet blog
Manchester City
Posted by Wallace Poulter on 09/08/2010

Teamwork, especially on the football field, is an over looked factor. Players take time to gel. Sometimes an understanding develops quickly, but usually this is not the case. It was therefore gratifying to see England manager Fabio Capello make the decision to partner Joleon Lescott with Phil Jagielka in the Euro 2012 game against Switzerland in Basel. I'll freely admit that Bolton's Gary Cahill is probably a better player individually, but Capello took into account that Lescott and Jagielka had played together at Everton and would be more likely to combine effectively.

I have in the past despaired at the selection decisions made by successive England managers. Time after time the same old regular, and obvious, starting 11 is picked; one that, frankly, most England fans could pick in their sleep. It's as if playing this same team together every game will make England better. It doesn't for one simple fact. When it comes to any international tournament there are always without exception at least a couple of players who are injured and/or suspended. Suddenly a new untried player is thrown into the mix or a previous squad member with virtually no experience in the starting 11 is expected to seamlessly slot into place.

And it fails. Every time.

Surely the smarter way to play is to presume that such injuries and suspensions will occur and treat international friendlies as a testing ground for additional player tinkering?

Play the first 25 minutes of a friendly with the starting 11. This gives the regulars a good run out and also keeps a positive relationship with the Premier League managers. Then come up with scenarios of injury and suspension and experiment.

What happens if Terry and Cole are injured? Would it be better for example in that specific circumstance to drop Duran Duran's inspiration (hereafter DDI) and play Jagielka, Lescott and Leighton Baines? I'm well aware that Baines did not perform well prior to the World Cup, but would a familiar group of players have improved that performance?

Or would DDI work well in a partnership with Jagielka with Lescott at Left Back? Maybe Cahill works better with DDI and Jagielka sits on the bench even though he is the better player? I don't know and the point is neither does Capello or any other previous England manager because they didn't take the opportunity to plan in a real game.

England have suffered at the last two World Cups because of injuries to Beckham and Rooney. That Santa Claus was off his game in South Africa should come as no surprise given the recent revelations, but it also appears that the star striker of Real Madrid's feeder club was less than match fit.

Unless an England squad is truly a squad with inter changeable parts that can be brought in as needed, then England will always suffer disappointment at the international level. The Premier League is the "best" league in the world we are constantly told. Well.... yes, top to bottom I agree although both la Liga and Serie A are pretty good. However the Premier League does seem to be the hardest on players week in and week out and it is here that Italy, Spain, Germany and Holland seem to hold the advantage at international level. The majority of their top players, with the exception of the Dutch, play in their own leagues.

There is, consequently, less wear and tear on their non Premier League players when the international tournaments are played at the end of the year.

England's only hope is to build a squad that truly works as one combined unit. The decision to play Jagielka and Lescott together is one small step in the correct direction. That was a partnership that worked at Everton. It could do so again for England and allow England to know with confidence how they would replace DDI and John Terry should the situation of both being unavailable occur in the future.

England ended up experimenting in a game that counted and won 3-1. Ultimately the result is all that mattered, but it would be beneficial in future international friendlies for England to start to anticipate such injuries. This is also an argument for England playing regular B internationals for similar reasons. Only by practicing these situations can England be properly prepared.


Comments

Posted by Jobbie33 on 09/08/2010

What is your thought on Barry & Gerrard partnership in the middle? Everyone knows that Gerrard's best position is in the middle and he've proved it time and time again. And with Adam Johnson forcing his way through the rank, Lampard might find it hard to get back into the team.

Wallace Reply It is unfortunate that Lampard and Gerrard essentially play the same position, but one has to start and the other has to be on the bench. It's been a mistake made for years to try and play them in the same team.

Posted by Rowan on 09/08/2010

Absolutely agree.

To be fair, Capello did try to do this on at least one occasion at the WC: he initially went with Carragher instead of Upson to replace DDI, I think because he figured Carra and Johnson (at RB) would have a better understanding. Unfortunately, Carra is too slow to cover Terry, so it didn't work. This is precisely the type of combination-problem you're talking about, and you're right, experimentation is needed.

On the plus side, I think it will benefit England immensely to have Milner and Adam Johnson playing together a lot for City. I think their understanding will be a lethal weapon: they can both change flanks well, they're complementarily-footed (Milner R and Johnson L), and they offer sufficiently different strengths (Milner's athleticism and power to Johnson's craft and finesse) to cause FBs absolute nightmares.

Of course, that assumes that Milner is not needed at CM, which I think he might be once Gerrard gets too old - though Jack Wilshere might do it too.

Posted by Chris on 09/08/2010

I think Gerrard is far superior to Lampard. He is a better all around player. I dont think Lampard should be in the starting 11. If when tournament time comes around and it's basically the same starting 11 as we saw in South Africa then England are doomed. They should stick with this team and I would even be looking to add even more young talent.

Posted by Helgi on 09/08/2010

Its amazing that no one in the last 10 years has been able to put together a good England team together. I feel though that players like Lescott, Johnson, Milner, Defoe etc. who are playing outside the traditional top 4 clubs will be just as good now and England will have more depth to the squad. They are still defending badly but Hart seems good.

Posted by Cody on 09/08/2010

Silly capello! walcott would've never gotten injured in the first place had he started AJ like he should've. I'm sorry but adam johnson is clearly one of the 3 best players on the squad the way he has been playing and continues to play.

Posted by Danial on 09/09/2010

Manchester City - "Ruining" football & The Three Lions since 2008.

Posted by Nico on 09/09/2010

Spot on. Note how England is much more fluent without Lampard in midfield?

Team work is the way england needs to go.

The ManCity english core and players who are just totally grateful to be there have provided a good base on which "star" players like Rooney and Gerrard can flourish.

However too many "stars" only makes a galaxy and not a team.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Wallace Poulter Wallace Poulter is an award winning video game producer, designer, industry consultant and writer. He has been a football fanatic since the day he moved in next door to Brian Clough. "Cloughie" being the acknowledged genius that he was promptly moved out and went to manage Derby. A serviceable senior school left-back in his youth, Poulter played one season of Sunday league football as a striker proving conclusively that he was a serviceable senior school left-back! Today Poulter remains involved with football as a licensed referee and most recently as a consultant on a Football MMO.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives