ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Manchester City
soccernet blog
Manchester City
Posted by Wallace Poulter on 08/12/2010

Ruthlessness is, on occasion, a useful trait. Stupidity is not. It's time for the FA to get their act together and get rid of England manager Fabio Capello. If the debacle that was the World Cup wasn't enough, the Italian's almost comical performance leading up to and after the friendly against Hungary should be the final straw.

First though let's go back to the World Cup and a quick quiz. What do the following countries all have in common? Uruguay, Hungary, Jamaica, Trinidad & Tobago, Greece, Andorra, Macedonia, Estonia, Austria, Croatia, Ukraine, Belarus, Egypt and Mexico. And the second part of the question is what do these countries also have in common. Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Brazil, Germany, Russia and France.

The first group are all the countries that Peter Crouch has scored a goal against in international football. Not a top quality team in the bunch (the Uruguay game being in 2006). The second group of countries are the world class teams that Crouch has played against without scoring a goal.

In boxing the saying goes styles make fights. So it goes in football where the best team isn't necessarily made up of the best 11 players that you can find. Rather you find players that work together best as a team. In certain circumstances players have specific attributes that make them better against opposing players and/or teams. This is the case with Crouch. He is not, nor will he ever be a world class striker. The Spurs forward is a quality Premier League striker who happens, because of his height, to cause significant match up problems for teams that are not in the World's elite.

Crouch should have been on the field for the kick off against Algeria and Slovenia. There's absolutely no excuse for Heskey to start in those games. England should have waltzed into the World Cup Semi finals. That they did not seems specifically down to the poor team selection of Capello.

We move forward to the squad selection for the Hungary game. Goalkeeper Paul Robinson and full back Wes Brown announced their international retirements after the squad was selected. From this vantage point a not so subtle 'up yours' from two players who were not taken to South Africa. Really though, what did you expect? Joe Hart and Glen Johnson have taken over the respective roles in the England team so the selection of Robinson and Brown was making up the numbers rather than an opportunity to reclaim their starting roles in the team.

However the most striking part of the England squad was the complete omission of Joe Cole from the squad. Cole is the player the England manager should be building around for Brazil in 2014. The 4-4-2 formation is dead internationally against quality opponents. Its time may return, these things go in cycles, but for now 4-2-3-1 should be the England formation.

Joe Cole, from all reports I've seen, prefers the central attacking role behind the striker. After years of being played out of position new Liverpool boss Roy Hodgson sticks the former Chelsea player into that central role against Rabotnicki in the Europa League and Cole turns in a man of the match performance. Certainly the quality of the opposition was not great, however the play of Cole and not coincidentally the much more focused play of Gerrard as part of the engine room "2" in front of the defense, should scare to death any City fan that watched that game.

It has been proven on a consistent basis that Lampard and Gerrard can not reproduce their club form when paired together at the international level. They are, essentially, the same player and you can play one and not the other. Here is the solution that should have been staring Capello in the face. Either Gerrard or Lampard partners Barry in the DMC role and Cole takes the AMC playing behind Rooney. This allows two outside players. Adam Johnson appears to have found a home in one of those positions (giving City three starters in the England team!) and depending on the circumstances Walcott, SWP, Lennon or Beckham has the other.

Which brings us to David Beckham. There's a natural tendency for City fans to be negative to Beckham given his United connections. Personally I think Beckham gets a raw deal. As kids we all wanted to captain England and marry a pop star. Beckham went ahead and did it; he's living everyone else's dream and I think there's a lot of petty jealousy. Name the last time Beckham didn't give 100% for England? Exactly... so as long as he does that, I'm a Beckham fan.

I'm also on record as saying that England lost all chance of winning the World Cup the day he was injured and I stand by that. Beckham is the only quality dead ball kicker that England have. It's a lost art in the English squad and you need such a player.

Apparently Capello thinks not saying after the game;

"David is a fantastic player, he was really important, but we have to see the new players for the future because the age is important for a lot of people, not only for David.

"Did I phone him before I went on television? No. I think I will speak with him. We tried to speak with him. But I think David knows he has no future with the international team because we have to change.

Utterly mind numbingly off the scale stupid. There are three minutes left in the game, England trail by a goal and need to score to take the game to extra time. Rooney is fouled 25 yards out, slightly to the left of the centre of the box. Name any English player that you would want to take that free kick other than Beckham in this scenario? You can't, because there isn't one. Until that changes Beckham has a place in any England squad. No, I wouldn't start him, give youth a chance with Walcott or Lennon, but Beckham has to be in the squad and available on the bench.

Moreover the way this was handled is pathetic. If Capello couldn't reach Beckham to inform him that he was going to make such comments then the England manager should have kept quiet until he did.

Enough. Capello has shown conclusively that he has neither the team formation, squad selection or man management skills to warrant any further involvement in the England set up. This is an England team that will continue to flatter in the qualifying stages and yet fall at the first serious hurdle in any competition as long as Fabio Capello remains in charge.

The worrying aspect for City is I see certain parallels between Capello and Mancini...

Comments

Posted by jak on 08/12/2010

Build a team around Cole, you must be joking. He is not half the player he was, thats why Chelsea got rid. As for Becks he was past it 5 years ago and is now 35. Englands main problem is with strikers when playing for England, we just don't have any that are deadly finishers and that includes Shrek with an England jumper on. As for the coach I was surprised he kept his job, but he has and has a good record, so we move on. Also why the jab at Mancini, another coach with a fantastic record who will take City to the title.

Wallace Reply Joe Cole suffered an ACL injury. While players come back from such an injury after 6-9 months they are not back to full ability until 18 months later. That 18 months is up, this month.

England's problem is a lack of service to the forwards, the wrong forwards being picked and ineffective midfield play. That leads to the end product which is a lack of goals.

Beckham is not passed it as his play for AC Milan showed when he was on loan the pass couple of years. He can still pass with the best of them. No he can't run, but frankly he never could.

Mancini will take City to silverware and probably this year. Whether that is good enough for him to keep his job will be seen. I have my doubts.

Posted by The Archivist on 08/12/2010

"The worrying aspect for City is I see certain parallels between Capello and Mancini..." Ummm....gee, Wallace, that might be an interesting opening statement for your latest posting, but to drop that on us as your final statement here, a bolt from the blue, is pretty ridiculous. Could you be bothered to elaborate??? For what it's worth, I generally agree with your points here about Capello, but exactly how is his performance as England manager similar to Mancini's with MCFC? I think you owe your readers a little bit more than you left them with, unless you plan to drop the "sequel" to this post tomorrow. Just my two cents.

Wallace Reply Indeed... stay tuned

Posted by AK on 08/12/2010

England's team is similar to City's in the sense that its a group of glorified superstars that have (so far) proved nothing when it comes to being a cohesive team. It has nothing to do with Capello! I agree he messed up with team selection (why Heskey, Upson, Green were ever on a plane to S. Africa is beyond me).

The problem with the english team is the English Premier League: There is a massive rivalry between players magnified by a hyperbolic press that follows and analyses every move and word. There is no winter break, and 3-5 extra games over other leagues. There is an extra cup, etc. Its just too much. They will never do anything in a massive competition, and that is proven by the fact that with the exception of Johnson (and maybe one day Wilshere), there are no "new" young ones even coming close to making the squad. The fact you mention Beckham shows how dire the situation is.

Posted by Lee on 08/12/2010

DIDNT CROUCH SCORE 2 AGAINST ARGENTINA WHEN WE ONE 3-2. AT THAT POINT I STOPPED READING. THE PREMIERSHIP IS MADE UP OF 20 TEAMS 14 OR SO YOU COULD SAY ARE IN EGYPT,HUNGARY STANDARD, SO DOES THAT MAKE DROGBA OR ROONEY ANY LESS LETHAL IF THEY SCORED THERE GOALS AGAINST THEM. MOST OF THE TIME A PLAYER LIKE THAT STRUGGLES TO SCORE IN THE SO CALLED BIG FOUR GAMES THROUGHOUT THE SEASON, THE YOUR INTIAL FEEDBACK ON CROUCH IS POINTLESS HAS NO SUBSTANCE AND GOALS ARE GOALS AND WHEN YOUR 10FOOT TALL AND A CORNER IS FLOATED OVER BOOM 1-0. ANYWAY IT COULD BE A GOOD ARTICLE BUT HAD TO STOP READING THERE AS THAT WAS ENOUGH FOR ME TO WRITE THIS. IF I READ THE REST I COULD YOU MIGHT FIND MY NEXT COMMENT IN WATERSTONES. GOOD DAY ALL!

Wallace Reply No, Owen score two and Rooney scored one in 3-2 victory over Argentina in November of 2005. Crouch has scored two or more goals in a game for England on five occasions. Those matches were against Jamaica, Greece, Andorra, Belarus and Egypt.

Posted by Swiss Tony on 08/12/2010

Tiredness is pure myth - some of the spanish players played more games than the Prem league players and they won the world cup!

Posted by Chris on 08/12/2010

Wallace - with all due respect I am a fan of your blog and regular reader, but seriously... "England should have waltzed into the World Cup Semi finals." Oh Dear. You are seriously deluded on this one... I agree that the team did not play up to its potential, however, NO TEAM WALTZES INTO THE WORLD CUP SEMIFINALS... especially England - they just don't have good enough defenders/defensive midfielders, and I say that with all due respect to Gareth Barry as a City fan.
EVEN IF they had beaten Germany, you really think they would have "waltzed" past Argentina?

Even if they had beaten the US and Algeria and topped their group, you really think they would have "waltzed" past that Ghana team, to say nothing of who would have dealt with Suarez and Forlan and Uruguay???

FACT -England has same number of World Class players as most countries not named Spain, Brazil and Argentina - three or four MAX (Rooney, Gerard maybe, Ashley Cole maybe)...

SEMI would have been over-acheivement

Wallace Reply lol Chris. Appreciate that you are the fan of the blog. The World Cup draw set up perfectly for England. Maybe "waltzed" is stretching... maybe a foxtrot? But seriously, their group was one of the easier ones, Ghana is a good but not great team and Uruguay are a decent side with a couple of quality players. An England team playing to its potential, not in my mind over achieving, just playing to their potential should have made the semi finals.

Posted by Francisco Silva on 08/12/2010

I have always thought that if you really want to win anything in internationl football you need to select as many players from one team as you can. In some cases I used to think that it may be better for any country to send the club with the most English players and if it has any foreign players replace them with good established ones for their positions. Don’t you think they would have a better chance of winning against teams that are only together for a few days a year? Well, we have the answer now. Spain’s success shows that this is the way to go. The following players that are considered starters for Spain are also starters for (surprise surprise) Barcelona: Pique, Puyol, Busquets, Iniesta, Xavi and Pedro. That is six players out of eleven that were completed with players from other teams because Barcelona uses foreigners in their positions (Messi, Alves, Ibra, Keyta, Toure, etc) Then they add a really good keeper and the result a World Cup wining Team. Holland did the same in '74

Wallace Reply It's an interesting argument. Certainly I feel that at the very least combinations of players might be useful where practical.

Posted by Francisco Silva on 08/12/2010

I really recommend you to read Soccernomics, a great book, if you haven't already.
You will be able to understand that England is not as strong as it seems. Under some statistics they are over-achieving contrary to what people think.
England won the World Cup 44 years ago on home soil and has not reached another final. Uruguay won it just 16 years earlier in a foreign country for the second time to name just one of many teams that have achieved more and are small soccer nations to the eyes of some.
Even Greece has won as many major tournaments as England.
I am really curious to know what is the potential you mention, because I remember watching England play 2 good games against Croatia that was the strongest oposition in the group together with Ukraine, but not exactly world class. The other games offered more like a distraction and shouldn't count because of the poor oposition. When was the last time England had a great game agaianst a world class team?

Wallace Reply Probably 5-1 against Germany

Posted by Francisco Silva on 08/12/2010

Exactly my point, that was I think 9 years ago. Another good game I think was in Euro '04, against France, except for the last 5 minutes.
But the thing is that the current team has not defeated anybody worth mentioning so the potential is only in our minds because of the late form of English teams in the Champions League.
I am with you on the Beckham issue. Capello brain farted. I wouldn't be surpised if he would blame the comment on his poor english or call it a misquote.
By the way I am a big fan of your blog and I enjoy it, even if sometimes I disagree. Keep it up.

Wallace Reply Thanks for the kind words. I agree that England have in many ways flattered to deceive. I think the issue is that England has had some very good players.

James was a decent goalkeeper. Not great, but ok. Ashley Cole is considered by many to be one of the best left backs in the world. Gerrard and Lampard have been superb at very stages in their career. Rooney is quality. John Terry I thought was over rated, although when Mourinho was at Chelsea he was very good (maybe not surprisingly Lampard played his best at the same time).

Rio I'm biased on. There are some United players that I can se past United, he's not one of them. Barry when he played at Villa was very useful. Hargreaves, when healthy was and is good. Combine that group and it is not unreasonable to think that they could indeed be the Golden Generation. Not to be however.

Posted by Falastur on 08/12/2010

"First though let's go back to the World Cup and a quick quiz. What do the following countries all have in common? Uruguay, Hungary, Jamaica, Trinidad & Tobago, Greece, Andorra, Macedonia, Estonia, Austria, Croatia, Ukraine, Belarus, Egypt and Mexico. And the second part of the question is what do these countries also have in common. Argentina, Portugal, Spain, Brazil, Germany, Russia and France."

What do the first list of teams have in common? Easy one. They're a list of teams that I could score against. What do the second list have in common? They're a list of genuinely good teams.

Wallace Reply lol, indeed. Which is my point. Crouch scores against the first group so he should play against similar sides. Heskey although much maligned did a lot of the dirty work against good sides that you need.

England miss Dean Ashton. Sad that he had to retire through injury. Quality old style English center forward that Rooney would have worked well with and yet also capable, unlike Heskey, of knocking in a few goals.

Posted by Jesse on 08/12/2010

Wallace [shaking head]... Dear, dear Wallace. English players are not very good. The managers keep changing, but the results keep staying the same... Doesn't matter if Redknapp or Rudolph the Red Nosed Raindeer is the manager -- England are quarterfinalists in whatever competition because they are not very good...

Wallace Reply That's not an unreasonable assertion. The World Cup this year just happened to line up so that the group winner from England's group had a reasonable chance of getting to the semi finals.

Posted by Daniel on 08/13/2010

Wallace, I love the blog. I really, truly do; however, I have to say that I think you're far too enamored of Joe Cole. Sure, he's a great talent, but he doesn't automatically solve all a team's ills. He did great the other day against Rabotnicki. Let me repeat that for emphasis. He did great against Rabotnicki. Do I think he would have improved England's chances in the World Cup? I do think he would have against teams that Crouch also beats up. The Dutch or the Spanish or the Germans would still eat him alive along with the rest of the team.

Wallace Reply er... you are really not going to like my prediction for Premier League Player of the Year...

Posted by Francisco Silva on 08/13/2010

I don't think that Joe Cole is the best player in the world, but he is probably one of the best English players when it comes to open up chances, and I thought that the point of taking him to the world cup was to have him unlock the defenses of the teams that are playing for a draw against England, like Algeria or Slovenia, specially since plan A was not working and you need someone to run at defenses and take chances on one on ones.
Argentina scored some goals with Messi unlocking the defense and someone else coming to tap the rebound into goal. Check Palermo's goal and some of Higuian's ones. In fact, the South american giants use thise strategy all the time because they know that other teams will park the bus so what they need is a master locksmith like Kaka, Robinho, Messi, etc. Joe Cole is certainly the closest England has as any of this players when it comes to force mistakes.
Against Germany he would have been useless as Barry was exposed and John Terry was outclassed

Posted by Tim on 08/27/2010

I honestly couldn't agree more with what you've said here. I've not seen any English player that can drill the ball like Beckham can from free kicks. He doesn't have the pace to keep up with some of the younger players, but the ball moves faster then any one person. Beckham's skill lay when that ball is fixed in a spot and there is a wall infront of it.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Wallace Poulter Wallace Poulter is an award winning video game producer, designer, industry consultant and writer. He has been a football fanatic since the day he moved in next door to Brian Clough. "Cloughie" being the acknowledged genius that he was promptly moved out and went to manage Derby. A serviceable senior school left-back in his youth, Poulter played one season of Sunday league football as a striker proving conclusively that he was a serviceable senior school left-back! Today Poulter remains involved with football as a licensed referee and most recently as a consultant on a Football MMO.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives