ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Manchester City
soccernet blog
Manchester City
Posted by Wallace Poulter on 02/10/2010

Lots of comment on the internet today about the victory at Bolton. Generally folks seem to have been underwhelmed by the performance. There are times when I really do wonder if I watch the same game as everyone else. This was by far the most interesting performance of the year under Roberto Mancini.

For the first time since Mancini joined the club the team started with the diamond formation that the former Inter boss used at the San Siro.

Barry, de Jong and Vieira formed the midfield ball winning roles with new signing Adam Johnson at the top of the diamond with Tevez and Adebayor in attack. At the back Vincent Kompany made a welcome return where he was partnered with club captain Kolo Toure. Rounding out the team were Zabaleta and Bridge as the full backs.

So that's the formation but in practical terms Johnson was all over the place marauding down both wings. Tevez and Adebayor were switching constantly and you could find Tevez over on the touchline or down the middle. Zabaleta and Bridge were both bombing forward creating defensive mis matches when Bolton tracked back slowly and both Barry and Vieira were encouraged to make occasional forays into attack, reminiscent of Michael Johnson when paired so effectively with Dietmar Hamann.

I loved it. Bolton didn't know where the next City run was coming from.

And then the worst possible thing happened; City scored. No, really. Adam Johnson tormented the former West Brom Left Back Paul Robinson down the right wing and won a penalty. Tevez duly dispatched the kick fortunate though he was to score after Bolton keeper Jussi Jaaskelainen completely won the mind game and Tevez's rocket shot went straight down the middle only for the Finn to be unable to prevent the ball finding the net.

Sometimes Manager's out think themselves and unfortunately this is what Mancini did. Now hindsight is a wonderful thing and at the time it made perfect sense to switch to a 4-3-3 formation allowing Johnson to run at Robinson. But in creating a static formation the effectiveness of the front six was diminished and the runs of Zabaleta and Bridge were no longer into space because Johnson and Tevez were now in the way.

City went from dominating the proceedings from a possession standpoint to giving the ball away more easily because Johnson, Zabaleta and Bridge were no longer easy passes for the midfield. This is the criticism that you see online, but it fails to take into account what went before and the decisions that were made that led to this. Bolton grew in confidence and started to bypass the midfield with over the top balls to take advantage of Kevin Davies.

The second half was much more even with Adebayor's well taken goal the difference. With Lescott on for an injured Toure and SWP on for a tiring Bridge City switched to a 4-4-2 with Johnson on the left. Again static didn't do the team justice.

I've complained loud and long that City don't have a play maker, and they don't. With static formation City will have issues against any club they face. However the diamond formation was a revelation in that it allowed Adam Johnson tremendous freedom and the support play of Zabaleta and Bridge was excellent. At times City had five players going forward in a move with a sixth, usually Vieira or Barry as a further option. Here you don't need a play maker because essentially everyone becomes part of that role. Fascinating, simply fascinating to see.

You'll see complaints online about why would Mancini play Barry, de Jong and Vieira together. I really feel these miss the point. How Bellamy, Petrov, SWP and Ireland fit into this is certainly a question to be asked and in fact one that I asked when Mancini was originally hired. Bellamy has the ability to play the Johnson or forward role, SWP and Petrov are a harder fit. I'd like to see Ireland be given the opportunity to play the Vieira role to see if that would work.

It's easy to find negatives in a 2-0 victory over Bolton. But look below the obvious. For the first 31 minutes City were really interesting.

Comments

Posted by Evan Georgiou on 02/10/2010

Great article...wasn't it great to be able to replace Kolo with Jolo and SWP for Bridge?I thought that Bridge made a huge difference and Zab and Vinny were so much better for having less pressure....Zab was the MOM....Shay looks a little disinterested though....

Posted by irememberberttrautmann on 02/10/2010

Great piece of writing - unfortunately not for your average football supporter - I only hope that people read and appreciate.

Posted by Martin Nazimek on 02/10/2010

Wallace,

Watching this team change from week to week is mancini trying to find some way in how the players are fitting his systems for next year? I dont know how ireland fits into the squad next year with this formation, even though i love watching him play. The same goes for petrov now that we have johnson. Is there going to be a mass exodus in the summer? CTID

Wallace Reply I'm not sure. I get the impression that Mancini is managing game by game from a formation and personnel standpoint and coming to various conclusions as he does. I'm loathe to see Ireland leave as last year he was one of the better players in the Premier League. Ironically this echos Robinho's complaint; that manager's in England (and by extension Europe) have systems that they use rather than figuring out how to get the most out of an individual talent.

Posted by Noah Wexler on 02/10/2010

Great post. Keep 'em coming. I am really behind Mancini to stay on at City as long as possible. I watch quite a few different leagues and followed Inter closely while he was in charge (I still follow them). I think Mancini has shown the ability to adapt and try new things and while not always perfect as you pointed out with the shift to a more static formation, it exhibits what many managers simply don't have; an understanding of both tactics and the ability to identify the strengths and weaknesses of your players and the oppositions players and try to utilize that knowledge to the teams advantage. The Hull loss was a difficult one to swallow any more losses along those lines will keep us out of contention, but I think Mancini has some good ideas of what to do with the team, he has options and is exploring them. I thought Johnson played great and I see a spot for both he and Ireland in the starting 11 moving forward. Petrov is good player but is too one dimensional for the long run.

Posted by John P. on 02/10/2010

Wallace,

Great post. What baffles me at the moment is if Bobby was lined up for the job a few weeks in advance, and being that he was unemployed for a long period, he would have had plenty of time to study and at least pre-plan his tactical set-up. If he had caught any statistics of last season he would have surely seen Ireland as an outstanding performer and not continue to play him out of position. I would like to see Ireland utilized in that CAM role for once with AJ and SWP in a 4-2-3-1 with Ade up top and Barry + DeJong holding. Although that would leave our little monster out....

Posted by bluetev on 02/10/2010

Good article - I still feel we need a strong player in the middle who can both tackle and pass, our midfield doesnt look top-four at the moment.
We need to give Barry a rest. What about Toure in midfield as a replacement? He is very obviously not doing a good job in defense, yet has good ball skills.
And Lescott and Kompany in central defense would be a good pairing, though still have doubts about Lescott. Wish we had spent 10-15m more and gone for Chiellini, him and Kompany would be monstrous

Posted by indiana loves mancity on 02/10/2010

As mad as Wallace is at city's january activity, it seems the two pieces of business that we did do have proved worth it. Vieira and Johnson impressed massively at Bolton and are making strong cases to be regularly included in the starting XI. I am loving the three ballwinning mids (enforcers as you say) Barry, De Jong, and Vieira. They are a wonderful foundation of skill, experience and stability from which to create a regular and effective attack formation.

On that subject, I agree the loose triangle of Ade, tevez, and Johnson was giving Bolton headaches. I can see the marauding CAM position being played by Johnson, Ireland or Bellamy. Maybe if SWP works hard, he can show mancini he wants that spot as well. This CAM position can give us what Wallace has harked on as our missing link in attack, the playmaker. Whats more encouraging is that we already have depth in this new and impressively effective position, the CAM.

Wallace Reply Grumpy rather than angry... lol. If the marauding CAM works I'm all for it. What I hadn't appreciated about such a formation was the attacking capability of the full backs really added to the options both for midfield outlet passes and support options for the forwards.

Posted by Ted on 02/10/2010

Wallace.
It might have been an 'interesting performance' but I sadly found myself nodding in agreement with Owen Coyles assertion that Bolton made us look very ordinary.
I will repeat that.
Bolton made us look very ordinary.
Mancini clearly has his own vision but my bet is that if he stays you will see Ireland, Bellamy,Wright Phillips,Petrov and possibly Onuoha all shown the door.

Wallace Reply I agree with Coyle for the last 60 minutes. I thought the team was very good the first 30. Do you disagree?

Posted by Chris on 02/11/2010

Okay... so Wallace, are you still cold on the prospect of making the Top Four? Look at results - we are even on points with Liverpool with two games in Hand. Villa dropped two points against United (if that can be said) and Spurs lost to Wolves... Even with the tricky fixtures in the next five or six games, isn't it conceivable that we have a decent shot to make fourth?

Glass half full or half empty?

Wallace Reply Yes I still believe that the club will fall short of that goal and in fact will achieve exactly the target that was publicly stated prior to the season; sixth.

Posted by Ted on 02/11/2010

Wallace

In answer to your question.
I thought we had a bright opening 15/20 minutes without creating a lot but I guess another win without performing particularly well is a step forward of sorts!
Like you I was disappointed we didn't try and strengthen the squad further and we may regret that at the seasons end.

Wallace Reply That was my observation. When City were playing a diamond with Johnson given a free reign in that first part of the first half City were useful. What changed was that they switched to a much more rigid 4-3-3 afterward and that was what led to the downgrade of the performance.

Posted by James on 02/15/2010

Great article and such a keen observation of this game! I can really see City developing into a Chelsea-like squad. With so many options in midfield.. holding midfielders like vieira, dejong, barry and wingers like johnson, SWP, petrov. Then I think you've got Ireland who can really develop into a Lampard-like player. With this I can really see a midfield formula similar to that of Chelsea.

Might I add that I believe we need real class fullbacks like Evra, Clichy, and Sagna as the "Big THREE" have.

Posted by pete on 02/16/2010

Wallace, really like your stuff, but cant help feeling that Hughes managed to get the free flowing, rotational play you are talking about, out of this squad on a regular basis in the first half of the season. We were poor at the back but my god we were scary going forward.

Hughes regularly talked about that style of play. He talked about signing players who 'understand rotational play', and he clearly defined the roles he expected forwards to perform. If only Mancini would stand on the touchline shouting "more tempo!" like Hughes did, instead of standing static watching us plod around.

In short, I think Hughes made us play like you have described far more than Mancini, with the same personnel.

I agree with you we likely wont finish in the top 4. But do you think Mancini is going to gut the squad in the summer to achieve the same end as Hughes? I think it reflects poorly on Mancini that he has not just fine tuned the defence, rather revamped the whole team approach.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Wallace Poulter Wallace Poulter is an award winning video game producer, designer, industry consultant and writer. He has been a football fanatic since the day he moved in next door to Brian Clough. "Cloughie" being the acknowledged genius that he was promptly moved out and went to manage Derby. A serviceable senior school left-back in his youth, Poulter played one season of Sunday league football as a striker proving conclusively that he was a serviceable senior school left-back! Today Poulter remains involved with football as a licensed referee and most recently as a consultant on a Football MMO.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives