At 7.30 Wednesday evening I viewed the starting eleven with optimism. At the break, like everyone in the ground wearing Fulham colours, everything was going according to plan. No save of note had been demanded of our third choice keeper on his debut. Gecov and Baird seemed to have a firm grasp on midfield, Odense had shown nothing coming forward to upset our centre backs, while Frei had an assist and lovely little goal to his name, with Clint burying the first with their keeper rooted to the spot. Further Fulham goals at the Hammy End would surely follow in the 2nd half.
I cannot adequately explain away the collective paralysis that came over the side in that second half. Even when Odense came out with more vigour I thought that would be a short-lived phase soon to blow itself out. Then from the right Neil had to react smartly to a cross shot. A silly foul from Baird gave the Danes a free-kick, and Fulham got their pants pulled down. Still I wasn't overly worried. But as time ticked down, with dreadful inevitability, Fulham froze in a manner I have not seen since 2007.
There should be no isolating of any one individual for Odense's last minute ability to move the ball from their 'D' to our flank and the subsequent cross that slid the dagger into our hearts. Fulham chronicler Rich has done that with his usual quality analysis at the hammy.com site. Fulham had failed to see out a game they would never have surrendered under Roy, and it's now our Dutch manager who has more than the whiff of Sanchez about him.
Jol wasted no time in his quotes of where we were naive and found wanting in that awful last 20 seconds. What a criminal waste of six months effort and sacrifice, to slide out in such slipshod fashion. My view, albeit with the benefit of hindsight? The Danes made sure to crowd Frei higher up the pitch in the 2nd half. So why was our impish little protege not switched flanks? Spurs do it with Bale and Lennon on a regular basis. Dempsey was no doubt pulled on 70 with Jol thinking the job was done. It wasn't. Duff was again way off his game, and we'd withdrawn the one man in our ranks likely to try a shot. Dembele, with nothing more to contribute in the 2nd half after playing Frei in, was the man to go off. Hopelessly unproductive again from a man we paid £5 million for.
Gecov? Good for an hour, then faded badly. Etuhu on to shore up midfield in those last 20 minutes and we would have held on. And Bobby, who did not have his best night I accept, being subbed with three minutes to go? Where's the sense in sending out Sa then? On that 93rd minute break where Orlando could have tried a shot or played Duff in one on one, trying neither ultimately led to us conceding and being caught out on the break. You think that would have happened with Bobby? If Jol says our dug-out was screaming at the players not to sit so deep, then I conclude the players are not listening any more. We badly needed a leader on the pitch in that second half too.
My final observations on the game itself is Briggs seems to be going backwards. Is this all part of the safety first approach that saw a Fulham free-kick 30 yards from goal played short and then 50 yards back to Etheridge? And whatever else is going on with Zamora right now, I swear on my scarf our striker has not seen a cross of the calibre that led to Fall's headed goal come his way in the past two months.
Now to the bigger picture. We are a club in turmoil. It's clearly a battle of wills - the manager against the old sweats, led - so we are led to believe - by the barrack-room lawyer Danny Murphy. His lieutenants AJ and Bobby, and no doubt a few others too. Fining Kasami £500 for missing the penalty at Chelsea is one thing. Patjim played the party line when instructed no doubt, told us it was entirely deserved and the money was going towards the player's Christmas party. But a ten grand fine off Murphy for storming straight down the tunnel at West Brom??? That's not something to be laughed off, if true. Our captain and the senior pros may have got away with it against Hughes a year ago, and Hughes had the good sense to let the players do it their way. But Jol's having none of this player power!
This all leaves the club holed below the waterline in the middle of a demanding run of games and only three points off the relegation places. Worse, because of Jol's inability to keep his trap shut, the press are all now on the story. A camera crew waiting for Zamora to turn up for the game and every pundit slavering to put his every move, gesture and grunt under the microscope. Was he really asking to come off after half an hour, having just set up the opening goal? Injured or not for the Bolton game, let's just get on with it and take some heat out of the situation.
So Bolton next, and here's the rub. I've made it plain on here how I question Jol's handling of the squad. He had these issues too at Spurs with both Danny and Bobby, and they got frozen out. Does Jol have the board's backing? I think he does. He's arrived with the remit to reduce the age of the side. Do we sit on our hands awaiting their retirement, or is it time to shove a few out the exit door? Duff, AJ, Danny, Aaron, Simon, Bobby, Etuhu...?
Maybe their time is indeed up. I've said before, there is no place for sentiment in football. No professional club can seriously tolerate rebellion in the ranks. And if a manager does not command respect he must be fired. A loss to rock bottom Bolton coming hard on the heels of the Odense disaster will really cut the ground from under Jol. Will the side he selects play for him Saturday? For the players then, a test of loyalty. Come five o'clock a lot will become clearer about the current state of Fulham Football Club.
The major caveat to my paragraph above is replacing the heroes who took us to Hamburg in 2010 with players of the same quality. And on the evidence of Jol's summer shopping and appraisal of his tactics to date, that is what seriously worries me.
There's a quote thrown out from the gaffer today, all too blimpish for my liking, where he says Fulham can still be a 'top six' side. Presumably he means in the Championship..?
Three points imperative off Bolton, come on the Whites, let's play for the shirt!
Twitter@fulhamphil

Posted by fraught_with_peril on 12/16/2011
Phil, why are we leaking so many late goals? Very disturbing. I quickly count Everton in the 90th followed by another in stoppage, Spurs in stoppage (albeit we needed to chase the game hell-for-leather at that point), Twente in the 88th, Swansea at 90+1 (chasing there too, but c'mon) and Odense the other night.
Is it too much age, too much naivete, too much fatigue from playing glorified friendlies in Europa qualifying in July, disorganisation, poor chemistry? Just what is it? This trend can be a killer.
And, Phil, when you figure out why and when Jol uses his subs, please enlighten us because I see neither rhyme nor reason. With as young a squad as he played Wed night, why did he leave a sub unused? And what was he thinking taking Clint off -- he was the only spark of attack we had in the second half?
I do think BZ looked better in the first half than you've given credit for. Let's lay off him and try to let him play and see how it goes.
Crucial tomorrow v Bolton. COYW !!!
 |
Posted by Terry Hare on 12/17/2011
An excellent piece, you summed it up perfectly.
 |
Posted by bigo1723 on 12/17/2011
Are the players tired? And what kind of professional rebels against the manager? You're paid to do your boss's bidding, so play!
 |
Posted by Nick W on 12/17/2011
The Murphy fine was only £1k. Which he had accepted he deserved. More worrying is that this has turned from a very balanced blog into a remarkably unbalanced one. Yes, I'm not a big Jol fan, and it is clearly evident that you're not either. But he's hardly the Antichrist. He needs time - more than ever at Fulham, this the the time that a Fulham manager needs the time to freshen up an ageing squad. What we need more than anything though is more movement in the attacking third. It's just so static at the moment.
 |
Posted by Vital_Teddy_KGB on 12/17/2011
Good article. Agree completely.
I believe Jol is good manager. I haven't agreed with all his moves, but I think he knows what he's doing.
I hate to say it, but I do believe that some of the players are undermining the squad performance. As much as I want to keep Zamora, if he's contributing to the unrest, he has to go in January. AJ is all but useless in League play. Murphy should've been shoved out two seasons ago. I still scratch my head as to how we managed to let O'Hara leave London.
Seems that if Jol is to stay, some of the squad will need to go in January, followed by some decent loan signing (Kranjcar, Macheda, ???). The new signings haven't settled yet, and we definitely lack talent in attack.
As I've said previously, I'm not quite worried yet, but certainly less than pleased with the general malaise and lack of urgency in the squad.
Still, I think the lads will rise to the occasion and take full points v. Bolton.
 |
Posted by doug on 12/17/2011
Zamora and Jol were never at Spurs together! Seen this casually cited as fact so many times, it makes me wonder how many of the speculative reports are based on false rumors that never seem to die such as this one. And the £10,000 fine... hadn't heard that figure before, and upon Googling the only place I found it was in the Sun. "If true" is your caveat... but it's from the Sun! Really Phil?
Clearly not everyone is getting along, but good results against Arsenal and Liverpool weren't that long ago. We choked in Europe and everyone is disappointed about it, but we have been improving in the league, and we should continue to without any Thursday commitments. Bolton is like West Ham last year, one game that we shouldn't let define our season. I admit, it is disappointing to see the needless manager drama come up again only 12 months later. If I wanted to associate with fans who demand immediate gratification I would have supported Chelsea.
Nick W, spot on comment there.
Blog Central: I added that caveat on the Murphy fine as I mentally questioned the amount. As you point out, Andrew Dillon on 'The Sun,' Hmm...Also interesting to see the club demand an apology from Channel 5 for starting the rumour BZ asked the bench to sub him after 30 mins. I saw no evidence of it myself and thought it bizarre.
 |
Posted by Rob on 12/20/2011
Kudos to the management at Fulham for a record breaking year and keeping the club in good financial health.
Does put things in perspective though. 4 million is just a rounding error to some of the other billionaire owners.
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|