ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Fulham
soccernet blog
Fulham
Posted by Phil Mison on 01/09/2011
© Getty Images
A fine all-round performance ensures there's no Cup shock against plucky Posh. Another home draw sets up a mouth-watering clash with Spurs in Round 4.

And boy do we owe them one! But let's begin by saluting the side for their convincing demolition of Peterborough. The day's top scorers with six and a first hat-trick in English football for Dio Kamara. No fewer than NINE goals inside 5 days after near-terminal misery in the run up to Christmas - well done to the players, and full marks to the manager for improving the balance of the side.

So what's changed? Let's take a reality check first and not get carried away by big wins over injury-ravaged West Brom and a side two divisions below us. But real signs of a sea change have started to appear alongside the first green shoots of spring. It started with both Paintsil and Baird returning to stabilise the back four. It's now the unit that Hodgson schooled to such impressive levels last year, with added goals from defenders for good measure - Paintsil the only one to miss out in the last fortnight (and let's face it, John's never looked good for a goal).

Duff has come back and game on game stepped up to approach the hunger and penetration of last season. He gave Peterborough the runaround and was desperately unlucky not to score.
Etuhu, hopeless before Christmas, turned up at Spurs, made Simon's opener on Tuesday and converted a fine first-time shot from the edge of the box yesterday.

As for our lone wolf up front. Were you watching, yes, I'm talking to you AJ & Eddie. I felt there was something more to his game Tuesday night, remember that early shot on the turn? Yes, he can seem infuriatingly casual, but that was a clinical and unfussy striker's hat-trick. Call him Fulham's Berbatov. Full marks Joe, will he now go on to convince Hughes he's the natural partner for Bobby? By the way, the TV highlights in no way gives a true reflection of a pulsating tie. We came close to hitting ten, while Posh gave it a real go - and should have scored first.

At kick-off I was chastened not to see even one of our youthful strikers on the bench, and concerned the senior pros were being asked to put in another shift after the busy holiday schedule. But Hughes tactics were vindicated. He clearly values a good run in the Cup and post-match said he wants to build continuity and momentum through a settled side. Can't argue with that. Luckily we avoided any injuries, and the boys will be well fired up now for our trip to Wigan.

That and the Stoke home game are certain to provide a sterner test than the past two games, but I think the tide really has turned and we can continue to put points on the board - the league down in the bottom half, lest we forget, is incredibly tight.

Now we have the added anticipation of a feisty 4th round derby with Spurs to end the month. We'll return to this theme in due course, but let's hope this will be payback time for the Whites. We only got a point off them last season and, of course, they put us out after a replay in the QF's of the Cup. In total command at half-time after Bobby's beautifully crafted goal, I turned to my mate and said, 'this is the season we get to Wembley.' Hmmm, 'Arry's subs did for us in short order in the 2nd half. As for this season, robbed by ref Mike Dean at home, unlucky not to get something in the return New Year's Day. Spurs will find us a much tougher nut to crack next time.

Finally, I must pass comment on two events away from Craven Cottage. Sadly it did not work our for Roy at Liverpool. I view his demise with sympathy, not malice, he looked haunted by the end. But having witnessed their FA Cup loss to United, I must congratulate him for getting Liverpool to play the Fulham way. It could have been us at Old Trafford - nothing in attack (Torres doing a perfect impersonation of AJ), no width and too many ordinary players on the park. No self belief away from home. What exactly is Kuyt's role meant to be?

And on a sour note, when is somebody going to relocate their moral compass and drive El Hadji Diouf from the English game? Bravo to Warnock for speaking as he did - in fact I thought he was commendably restrained.

Remember this blog started the whole debate about ugly football of the Blackburn, Stoke, Wolves variety back in October. It clearly reached the FFC players and led to Murphy going public on the thuggery.

Keep your feedback rolling, the next 'Director of Football' sure shook some trees with his blueprint for the future. Strangely, I'm still waiting for the club's call to confirm my role...
Twitter@fulhamphil

Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter and Facebook


Comments

Posted by RoversFan on 01/09/2011

An alternative take on Warnock (and ugly football): Mackey's tackle on Givet was disgusting. It drew massive condemnation from the fans at the game and from Pederson and Nelson, two extremely well-respected players within the game. No one deserves a broken leg, but the fact remains that the tackle was terrible and Givet was lucky to come out alright. I think that Warnock, who was once sent to the stands by referee Graham Poll for instructing his player to break an opponent's leg, successfully drew attention away from the brutal way his team played. The ugly tackles and elbows were reminiscent of the days when Mark Hughes himself managed Bully Boys Blackburn. Allardyce played a physical game, but Rovers certainly cleaned up their act under Big Sam, and that's something that many refuse to recognize. Of course, Diouf is a questionable character, but the ugly football that you write about and Murphy speaks about was on display yesterday, and the guilty party was Warnock and QPR.

Blog Central: Thanks for the observations, presumably from someone who was at the game? The feeling here in the south is that QPR are heading their league on the back of stylish passing football. Did they change their approach based on Rovers reputation for the physical?

Posted by Sean on 01/10/2011

I don't often get to watch the games, here in the US, only seeing 1 of every 3 or 4 matches. But, the report here gives me the feeling of the game and how it went, so I greatly appreciate that Phil.

Looking at the league games played on the stat sheet,it's quite interesting. Of the 21 league games, the defensive four of Hangeland/Hughes/Pantsil/Baird account for 80% of the time (68 of 84) with Salcido and Kelly covering the rest of the time. For the midfield, Murphy/Dempsey/Davis/Etuhu have played 93% of the time, with Gera and Duff also figuring prominetly in the rest of the playing time. However, at Forward, Dembele and A. Johnson (the leaders in games played) acount for 50% of the time.

I know this is an OVERLY simplistic view, and doesn't account for Duece or Gera playing forward. But, adding in Kamara at 9 games and Bobby at 4, still gets 81%. There's been no cohesion up front.

Some stability there, and the team could spark ahead in the 2nd half!

Posted by yankFFCfan on 01/10/2011

i LOVE fulham, but if reports are true that fulham is in talks with diego maradona to be the manager, it will be tough to maintain allegiance. of course, that is a bit of hyperbole, but lets hope its not true.

Blog Central: Recall Maf appointing Franco Baresi over Tigana's head to be Director of Football back in '02? It fractured their relationship. Hughes will be off like a shot if he thinks Maradona is being lined up to replace him. Must therefore assume Diego is hoping to muscle 'director of football' role away from my good self. Both scenarios are equally absurd.

Posted by Colin on 01/10/2011

Agreed, appointing Maradona would be a one-way ticket to the Championship. I would also find it hard to pull for a team run by a crazy person. I hope it's just typical Maradona nonsense and there is no truth to it. Absurd is right!

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left