ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Fulham
soccernet blog
Fulham
Posted by Phil Mison on 01/26/2011
© Getty Images

Is there ever a good time to be going to Anfield? Our record over the decades suggests not. Both sides were struggling badly when the big freeze hit a month ago. Where do we stand now?

Fulham and Liverpool both come into this fixture off the back of confidence boosting wins at the weekend. Both camps will feel better prepared for this re-arranged encounter than they were pre-Christmas. Of the two sides the sea change on Merseyside has been the greater, with our former manager's position becoming untenable and the return of 'King' Kenny.

It's now clear Roy Hodgson's appointment at Liverpool was undermined from the start. Not by the board, nor the fans - though there was much public resentment these fallen giants of the English game could not attract a bigger figure from world football. No, it was the Liverpool squad who collectively decided they weren't going to perform for Woy.

Hodgson's measured and pragmatic approach to addressing what had been a lengthy period of decline under Benitez was never going to sit with a Koppite mentality that Liverpool were one of Europe's elite, deserving by divine right of a place at the top table.

Recall how long it took Roy to turn us around in 2008? Nine games for his first win at the helm? Oh no, that was never going to be acceptable to board or fans of these former greats. The truth is that with Torres sulking and nursing his hamstrings, the increasingly error-prone Carragher at the heart of a creaking defence, and new signings needing time to settle, Liverpool actually found themselves in a relegation fight instead of pushing for a place in Europe.

The reality of Liverpool's decline has taken a long time to penetrate Scouse bravado, and Roy was an easy target to be tagged the scapegoat. A month ago Liverpool were humbled at home by Wolves, the result that saw Roy finally set on the path to the exit door. And you might have been tempted to feel last December would have been the perfect time to face a side beset by dischord.

Er yes, except that from the start of November on, beginning with a dreadfully limp performance at home to Villa, Fulham were absolute pants themselves! While our defensive unit remained sound, sterility from midfield and a complete lack of punch up front made us a soft touch.

Now we've turned it around, as Liverpool have. But...and here it comes, I'd rather have Hughes in my camp for the 2nd half of the season than Kenny Dalglish. That no master plan from the new Yank owners at Liverpool had been thought through was self-evident. Only a ship-to-shore message yanked Dalglish mid-cruise from his sunshine holiday in the Gulf. Kenny's been busting a gut to put out the fire at Anfield, but does he still know how to drive the fire engine???

Time will tell. Let's focus on Fulham. Getting a win at Anfield has been beyond us in 29 previous visits. I'm afraid I despaired of travelling up there some years ago. However, we managed typical Hodgson-style 0-0 draws on our last two visits plus there was a thumping 3-1 win over the Reds at home last season. Yes, Stevie is back from his ban, Torres is scoring again, but that defence still looks suspect to me. We've taken ten points from the last 15, our defensive record away from home is outstanding, and since January the side really looks like it has goals in it - from sources other than the mighty Clint.

For the first time in years I think we can walk under that 'This is Anfield' sign with the confidence to say, yes, 'This is Fulham' and we are a match for you guys in every department.

Depending on the outcome of late fitness tests I'm hoping disruption to the side will be minimal and Hughes sets us up to give it a real go. Make no mistake Kenny, you have a big job on your hands. We won't have massive support tonight, but a big shout out to all those making the effort. It could just be the night for a famous result in Fulham history. It's been that kind of year in the Prem.

COYW! Real supporters for life, not just a life-style... Twitter@fulhamphil

Comments

Posted by Pras on 01/26/2011

Oh come on, Roy is like a teacher who can make failing students get a pass mark. He's definitely not the one to make already good students get the highest distinction marks. He's good for clubs like Fulham and err Blackburn but not for LFC. Success at Halmstad and Malmo cannot be compared to success at LFC. I understand that Roy's dad was an Everton fan and Alex Ferguson is his best mate... Well well..

Posted by magnumopus on 01/26/2011

I guess the saying,"hope springs eternal" is still alive in some parts of England tonight!

Posted by Amit on 01/26/2011

I think you like many other fans are deluded a bit. You claim Roy had such a mediocre squad and was not to blame but then how do you explain Newcastle and Blackburn etc? Do they have better squads than Liverpool? If you say yes then you are just plain mad. They got new managers and they actually had them playing football. Did you watch Liverpool's style of play under Hodgson? Of course Fulham fans would be happy with boring defensive football against bottom of the table teams, but that doesn't mean Liverpool fans should accept it themselves.
If you know your football (you should I hope) you will see the clear difference in the style and confidence of the team under Kenny. At least give him also the benefit of the doubt before condemning him.
That said, Fulham are going to get a nice thrashing tonight, which would never have happened with Roy in charge, and you know that too.

Posted by Kev on 01/26/2011

Its not a devine right, but a willingness to be back at the top; and that my friend is the difference between the clubs. You speak about a 0-0 draw as an accomplishment and that is why Roy was not sucessful at LFC. Roy's mentality from day one was not to lose, and that was seen in the way the squad played. The players obviously have to take some of the blame for not performing, but when your manager is not motivating you to go out there & get a win, then you will struggle. Dont doubt that Roy will have success again, but when expectation are as high as it is at LFC, you need someone that can deliver the right mentality and Roy showed on several occassions that he was out of his element. The funny thing however is that you rather have Hughes than Hodgson, just goes to show that you rather have a manager willing to win than one willing not to lose. Both squads are coming off confidence boasting wins, so tonight will surely be a better game than if they played back in December.

Blog Central: Actually I said I'd rather have Hughes than Kenny

Posted by David on 01/26/2011

Roy was undermined in multiple ways in Liverpool. He was undermined the moment Dalglish said he wanted the job before Roy was hired. He was undermined by the players sulking and under performing. He was undermined by the fans who thought their team was to good for him.

Roy is top class manager and top class individual. It was shame he ever left Fulham and even more of a shame how short his stay in Livepool was. It is sad that some of the players and fans didn't think the team could learn anything from him considering he has been playing or managing in the game sinc ebefore some of them were born.

I'd like to think tonight will be a game the squad is up for given the recent history.

Posted by David on 01/26/2011

It is also of note that the player making the difference for Liverpool at the moment, Meireles, was a Hodgson buy.

Posted by Amit on 01/26/2011

David, what you smoking fella? Top class manager? What has he done to be classified a top class manager? Just because he has been around for ages doesn't mean he is top class. He might be experienced, but not top class by any means.

Posted by David on 01/26/2011

Amit, while I know some people don't rate Roy's experience he has won 13 trophies during his time in Sweden and Denmark. He took Switzerland to the second round of the World Cup in 94 and he qualified Blackburn, Inter, and Fulham for Europe making the final with both Inter and Fulham. He isn't Jose Mourhino but he is not the never was everyone makes him out to be.

Posted by Amit on 01/27/2011

That's fair enough and kudos to him but did you watch how Liverpool played under him? And have you watched how they are playing under Kenny? This is the same team, the same players yet the difference in their play is night and day. We were literally playing mid table team type of football in style and mentality whereas we are now playing like a top team should, which is also how we were playing under Rafa. Yes he had a poor season but everybody has poor seasons. Some are stuck with and some get kicked out. I blame the previous owners for that crap but I am happy to have Kenny here now.

Posted by Mike on 01/27/2011

lol "years of decline", they got 2nd, lost Alonso and Arbeloa and had an awful year.

Roy never had a chance, because the fans only considered him a stop gap to calm it down while the owners sold, which worked very well. He basically lost the fans when he spent all day rubbing his face and apologizing to everyone on a daily basis. It was just not a good match. I know I'm not alone when I say that I liked Rafa in part because he had clear disdain for his opponents coaches like Mourinho and Ferguson, not googly-eyed man-crushes. He considered Liverpool a superpower who suffered when they struggled, not a decent team who with a little bit of luck could get 4th or if we're super special, 3rd (whether realistic or not). To Roy's defense, injuries to Agger, Carragher, Gerrard & Torres didn't help, but you also have to question him for sending Aquilani to Juventus and Insua to Galatasaray, especially for who they were replaced with...

Blog Central: Last league title 1990, FA Cup 2006...2010 bottom three, the 'years of decline' right there

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left