|
|
 |
|
This is Ground Control to Major Mark...you nearly made the grade. Ground Control to Major Mark...your system's dead, you've lost your spark...Can you hear me Major Mark?
©nasa
In journalism it's sometimes wise to step back from a story for 24 hours and let the heat die down. File a report on the final whistle and you write from the gut, say what you see. The adrenalin is still pumping. Later in the week your leader writers get the chance to sit back and craft a more measured piece for reflective debate. Therefore I took solace last night in some wine with friends before filtering through the feedback from all sides this morning.
Knocked for six as I was by Fulham's capitulation Sunday at the Cottage, if you refer to my preview piece I sensed the omens were bad ahead of City's visit, but hesitated to post negatively going into a vital game. I called it a watershed, and it was certainly that - a real pasting on home soil. Make no mistake, the relegation fight starts as of now. It will be a real test of character for Hughes and his staff to haul morale back up for the Brum game on Saturday. After that, away trips to Arsenal and Anfield sandwiched by a visit from Sunderland...ouch.
The City result surprised me not a jot, I flagged up the Tevez threat, leaving Gera out of the starting line-up was - yet again - a major aberration. Were City actually that good, or are we currently that bad? Poorly directed clearances directly contributed to three of the goals, Salcido's positioning at fault for the killer 3rd, though why did we allow City the freedom of the pitch to pass their way up to the box? Some people are seeking comfort from the fact we stepped it up in the 2nd half. Truth is, City had us by the throat and eased back. Yet again, as at Chelsea, Joe Hart not tested at all in the first 45.
I'm sitting here biting my fingers to refrain from slagging off AJ up front, as the service from midfield is non-existent, but he's increasingly starting to look a clone of David Healy, and the whole side now has the whiff of Sanchez about them.
I guess you can't blame Hughes for the way form has totally deserted Duff, and Murphy and Etuhu to a lesser extent. Davies should never have been given another contract in my opinion. But as we now have NO midfield engine at all to speak of, the pressure on our usually so reliable back line will increase, we are devoid of firepower up front, and losing can quickly become a habit. You could also point to 20% of our game last season coming from team spirit, which also seems to be lacking.
Managers do not tend to knee-jerk reactions. What has disappointed me in the aftermath is how quick our manager has been to focus on City's 'outstanding' performance and their 'clear title credentials' instead of focusing on his own team's capitulation.
We know Hughes' options are severely limited with Dembele and Zamora sidelined. But surely he cannot send out the same underperforming eleven for the relegation six-pointer with Birmingham? Push Baird into a 5 man midfield and restore Paintsil, make Gera your target man, and chance young Alexander Kacaniklic on the wing. Desperate times call for desperate measures. But then I don't pick the team. And before Bobby's back at this rate we will be starting the New Year in the bottom three.
Like some others, I'm beginning to question if Mark is just an unlucky manager, or if indeed he has the flexibility and sense to initiate change. Not only Sunday, but it hasn't been working now - apart from Wigan - for quite a while. And apologies to Bowie for messing with his lyrics.
Twitter@fulhamphil

Comments
 |
Posted by chriscoleman on 11/22/2010
i must admit, i was the first one to hold up my hand and say wait when i felt you were overreacting in previous blogs; there are natural ebbs and flows in seasons. but after sundays game i could not agree with you more about the midfield; the problem right now is the midfield. although the defense looked like they were at fault for 2-3 goals, and the front line looked punchless, i think these are both products of the severely deficient midfield. davies cant stop making mistakes, simple stupid mistakes and murphy and etuhu were non-existent. duff, i am not sure what is wrong with him, but he needs some time on the sidelines.
still, i believe we are a better side then some of the teams currently punching above their weight right now, but we need to put some good performances together and start climbing up the table. some changes are in order.
 |
Posted by David on 11/22/2010
I definitely think Duff should be sitting and Gera should be playing. At this point the only offensive weapons the team has are Gera and Dempsey. AJ, while it is nice he is back and fit, hasn't proven he can get on the score sheet in a long time.
I like the idea of moving Baird into central midfield. I think he excelled their last year and it seems the team needs someone in the middle to do some dirty work and win the ball to free up Murphy to orchestate more. Letting Etuhu rome around isn't working. It just makes him anonymous. Roy made him do the dirty work in the middle for a reason, he can't contibute on the offensive side.
Also Hughes has to make Salcido stay home more. The left side was wide open all game against city. He is great going forward but he needs to defend too.
 |
Posted by Drago on 11/23/2010
Fulham has yet to figure out how to play without Zamora as a target man. The midfielders were conditioned to look for Bobby Z. and then crash in from the wings, with Duff and Davies benefiting the most (see Duff's goal against Wolfsburg). People have talked about the current lack of service into the box, but it was Zamora who just as often created chances for others.
A new approach is required. Dempsey and Gera need to play upfront, which they did well last season in Europe with Bobby ailing. Hughes should start AJ with them and try three forwards. The Man City match was an aberration -- this is still a solid outfit defensively. It's scoring goals that's the problem.
 |
Posted by Michael on 11/23/2010
I fear for this team now. They need to start winning, and that does not seem likely soon. Sparky has not done much to show he's willing to change and continues his shaky selections.
Duff looked horrible on Sunday, and why they couldn't clear is beyond me. Salcido appears not to be the best defensively as he was schooled a number of times. I think AJ is overrated, and think its only time before he's injured yet again.
The team is thin to begin with, and when the top players aren't playing, its a long season...
 |
Posted by Michael on 11/23/2010
It's going to be a very long season. This appears to be a ruddlerless team, destined to spend the next 6 months trying to avoid the bottom 3. I would currently give better than 50-50 odds of ending up no worse than 18th, no better than 16th.
 |
Posted by Jonathan Atkinson on 11/23/2010
I am really annoyed with Mark Hughes' current team selection. He is yet to really establish a certain starting eleven, and this can only lower morale, as players will be wondering what their position in the team really is.
Where is Pantsil? For heaven's sake, what did he ever do to Hughes? I believe he is a better player than Kelly and Baird (at least a right back anyway?. He was fine last year. If it isn't broken, then don't fix it!
Gera surely deserves a permanent place in the team, especially after last season. Let's hope Hughes starts to cotton on to the fact that Gera at least adds some desperately needed flair. I mean, come on, Duff and Davies are playing rather ordinary football at the moment.
Do we really need additions in January? Hodgson did just fine with the current cattle. I hope Hughes gets his act together before he completely undos all the fine work Hodgson did in building this club into a stable unit.
 |
Posted by Jonathan Atkinson on 11/23/2010
Drago - If we were to play three forwards, then we would need three central midfielders. Baird could join Murphy and Etuhu, but if that means Kelly comes back in the team, I would rather play 4-4-2, with Gera on a wing, and Dempsey and AJ in attack. Duff and Davies should slug it out for the other midfield spot.
 |
Posted by Tom the Yank on 11/23/2010
Good write up, Phil. I was just over for 10 days and the football vs Villa, Chelsea and Toon ranged from uninspiring to dire. 1 goal in 3 games and, clearly, Duff is not match fit, Kelly is average when he plays his best, Salcido was rushed back and we have no width or pace to create chances in the final third. Without Zamora or a proper target man to bring others into play, we've got Danny Murphy looking to thread a pass to one of two or three who are closely defended at the top of the box - it's not working.
What to do? Hope to hang on until Jan. and then bring in players like Donovan, Santa Cruz and Bentley who fill gaps. Play Pantsil at RB and Baird next to Murphy, instead of Etuhu. Give Kacaniklic and/or Della Valle a run out and sit Duff and maybe AJ. Gera must start, going forward, as he's one of our best attacking threats. Let's hope that Wolves, Wigan and West Ham are poor enough to keep us up, this season.
 |
Posted by Drago on 11/25/2010
Jonathan--
I'd like to see Baird remain at right back, with Davies joining Murphy and Etuhu. I agree with the board's general assessment of Duff, but not of Davies. He's still contributing, making good runs and helping defend (to my eyes at least). That said, I wouldn't oppose bringing Baird into the midfiled and reinstating Pantsil.
The hunch behind a 4-3-3 is that AJ would become more effective working off of other players...his quickness would be magnified and he'd create more havoc. Right now, he's too often alone up top and too easily pushed off the ball. Making runs and being played through, that's where he can thrive. Both Dempsey and Gera, it seems to me, are at their best in attack.
A 4-4-2 would probably be wiser against the top clubs, but these draws against bottom feeders for lack of goal-scoring is a problem.
 |
Posted by abd malik arip on 11/26/2010
Sanchez began the shadow of management, the position is still not safe, and the position of the list of the ten best teams do not know where to defeat after defeat. Notwithstanding the name, which is considerably better reputation, the fact that Fulham continued to struggle out of relegation zone
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|
|
|
|
About
|
Phil Mison is a lifelong follower of Fulham FC. As a broadcaster, writer and sports producer he has supplied past club videos and numerous articles on FFC. LBC Radio's Fulham correspondent 1988-1993 and Sky Sports’ reporter for the 1996-97 promotion season. Professionally Phil delivers football content to the highest level both overseas and across the UK via TV, radio and mobile.
|
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|