ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Fulham
soccernet blog
Fulham
Posted by Phil Mison on 11/11/2010

All rather predictable as the Whites return empty handed from their trip to Stamford Bridge, or do we take solace from the fact we ran the Champions close? Cut it any way you like, a loss is a loss.

© telegraph
Mark Hughes felt his side deserved a point for their 2nd half display. Really? I think he's being disingenuous at best or naive at worst - and I'm certain Sparky's seen too much professional football for it to be the latter.

Why not turn in a solid 90 minutes? How many sides would expect to get something from a game against the Champs by only performing at 50%? We got precisely what we deserved - nowt. Chelsea, way below their best, should have been out of sight before we had our first decent shot on goal. Two off the line, Schwarzer getting in the way of a close-range fizzer he knew nothing about, Kalou and Malouda both guilty of failing to finish when clean through.

The tragedy of our fruitless endeavours, an inability to ask any questions of a below par Chelsea. I could have played centre-back alongside John Terry, who was clearly struggling by the end. Terry's suspect back is going to bring a premature end to his career I'm certain. Not once did Duff test his pace against Boswinga. With both he and Davies continually checking back inside and passing square, or back into midfield, these two need a spell on the bench.

Davies was our most dangerous player. There was danger every time he conceded possession or delivered a hospital pass to another white shirt - I gave up counting them. We manufactured nothing from our four corners or free-kicks into the box. Invariably, if you review the video, they acted only as springboards for rapid Chelsea counter attacks. When you're playing a top side like the leaders away it's unlikely you will enjoy more of the possession. You must therefore maximise any opportunities you get to hurt the opposition. This is what sides like Stoke and Blackburn do so well. We are abject in this department.

Let's turn the microscope on our attacking game plan. Was there one? Knowing your talismanic striker is out long term you ask, where are the goals coming from to keep you afloat in the league? I genuinely don't recall either Duff or Murphy putting in a threatening shot to date with a third of the season gone. Davies too can lash a ball from distance. Take Essien's winner. Who from our midfield four ever charges the near post for flicks, headers and feints to unsettle defenders? Etuhu on the odd occasion maybe. Wing backs? Salcido shows willing, but Kelly can't offer that - even debutant Briggs showed more ambition to go forward.

We had two real efforts on goal in the last 20 minutes as we belatedly realised Chelsea were running out of steam. Who hits the 2nd with his first touch? Why is Hughes not starting last season's Player of the Year. Gera was poor against Villa...but who wasn't? He is the one front player with vision and some intelligence. He has a good shot, he's strong with his head, knows his abilities and rarely over-elaborates.

Dembele, Dempsey and AJ are running around like headless chickens. When Andy was introduced, far from unsettling Terry, the ball never got to him for 10 minutes. Dembele in August ghosted past defenders with the ball seemingly tied to his laces, now he's running up cul-de-sacs, his touch gone. Coming back into a lop-sided and struggling side fills me with foreboding for Andy's prospects of getting back on the goal trail with so little to feed off. I sense opposition teams will find Fulham pretty toothless till January at least.

Apart from Hughes strange assertion we 'deserved a point' was his brusque response in saying he was not concerned by our current form. Thousands of supporters I suspect might disagree. In the last month I note WBA, Bolton, Blackburn, Everton, Blackpool and now Stoke all playing better football than us. Wolves have turned in some exceptional performances with absolutely no luck...West Ham and Wigan are showing flashes of spirit...while we slide ever closer towards the bottom three, a position likely to be compounded should the winless streak away from home continue at Newcastle.

Having shunted nice guy Ray into the sidings and surrounded himself with his own team, Mark may be developing a bunker mentality reminiscent of Sanchez at the same stage of the 2007 season - and we all know how that ended. I hope I'm wrong, and this is not an over-reaction to a narrow 0-1 loss to the league leaders, but the worry beads are out of the draw...

Please tell me I'm wrong! To finish on a note of optimism. Bravo for Briggs, our next Chris Smalling. Hope he gets a chance to shine.
Twitter@fulhamphil

Comments

Posted by Taylor on 11/11/2010

Hm...I echo your concerns about our squad. Is it a case of our midfielders just getting old? Not adapting to tactics quick enough? Too much of a cost losing our two best players (Big Z and Salcido)? Dembele getting scouted and defenders getting used to his style? Issues that Dempsey is seemingly the only one to score? AJ still waiting to step into his old stride? Far too many questions, with no answers as of yet.

The bright side? We are only 4 points away from 5th. The way the league is shaping up, a lot of teams clumped together, who knows what could happen?

The negative? 2 points away from the drop zone...

Let's hope things will get figured out, and they'll play more like we did versus Wigan than we did against Villa.

And the Gump column was classic.

Posted by Toby on 11/11/2010

Sure you're over-reacting slightly. But it's cool to be disappointed that we didn't 'play-up' when you've got Chelsea playing below par.

One note though - Duff has only just 'come off the bench'

Posted by Snoop on 11/11/2010

Just eleven days ago, after the win against Wigan, it seemed like everyone was generally happy with Fulham's performance in the first part of the season. The results since then -- a home draw against Villa and a close away loss to the Champs -- should not have radically changed anyone's assessment. Doubtless we played too conservatively throughout the game at Chelsea, but let's keep our eyes on the big picture. The next three games -- at Newcastle, and then home for Man City and Birmingham -- will give us a very good idea of where we are. If we can get more than five points out of those three games, I think we have a solid argument for top 8 status.

Posted by theom on 11/12/2010

Murphy is dreadful. We need a 4-4-2 Diamond with Gera in AM and Murphy on the RESERVES. He's hopeless.

Posted by jerry on 11/12/2010

We don't have to blame the players that much.Chelsea was just too good for Fulham.

Posted by Ron in Canada on 11/12/2010

Enjoyed reading the comments.
I also enjoyed the game.
Chelsea are some team and they were a little too much for us.
I thought the tactics were right.
If we had gone after Chelsea from the off I believe we would have gtot punished and likely been beaten quite badly.
I think at a minimum we have played some of the better teams and our goal difference is not terrible - with such a close league that is possibly going to be a factor this year.
Our whole schedule is going to be tough this year - that is a good thing- we are in the EPL.
I for one am glad that Fulham are part of that.
Hughes and the squad are doing a good job. The transfer window beckons but Hughes is smart enough to know what we need.
In the meantime I will continue to enjoy our team performances and take something out of each of them .........good or bad.
COYW

Posted by David on 11/12/2010

I personally think the midfield might need some freshening up. Duff, Davies, and Murphy are all fine individually but collectively they are all on the wrong side of 30 and look slow and indecisive playing together against a team of Chelsea's caliber. The thing that is the most impressive about Chelsea is the way they clog the passing lanes. They made it hard for Fulham to string passes together in the midfield and I think that comes down to slower reaction time by those 3. Plus neither Duff or Davies seems fast enough to get down the line and send in cross. It might be worth while getting Riise some playing time even from the bench. Also Gera should be playing over Davies anyway...

Posted by chriscoleman on 11/12/2010

i am glad some of the readers have a cooler head then the blogger, come down off the ledge phil, it's alright. i really do love your column and the insight you provide into the game, you catch things that i do not, but you are too quick to overreact in my opinion. one win and we are top 5, one loss and we are relegated for sure. bottomline is that chelsea, sub-par or not, are too much for us (away). we played 5 midfielders and that is what we needed to do. i especially disagree with your assessment of dembele. he made runs and good runs, he just ran into a defense that had to only mark one man many times, because of our deep set. this tactic kept it within reach for the entire game, one lucky bounce or a moment of inspiration from hangeland, or anyone and we are singing from the rooftops.

Posted by Adejumo Akinwunmi on 11/12/2010

I totally disagree with the straight red card given to essien for his tacle, it was a very fair tackle. Demsey knew he has lost the ball now slide which any player need to protect himself. The ref. knew that the red card should have been a second yellow if at all he sees anything in the tackle

Posted by Michael on 11/12/2010

Didn't see the game, but that is not my concern. We need to put together some wins. Draws won't do it. We've had far too many of them

Posted by Dan on 11/12/2010

Could've been 3 or 4 zip. This is a carryover from the bland performance against Villa's B-Team. There seems to be a lack of consistent offensive creativity. You are right, Phil, where are the goals going to come from if not Dempsey. Hughes must play Gera now!

Posted by lynch on 11/12/2010

Agree that dembele was not the problem. he continues to impress me. What I did have a problem with was Danny Murphy in the middle. No creativity, no winning 50/50 balls. did well enough on defense, but we need mor hes still a great field general when he has time, but playing on 3 days rest he had no chance of keeping up with the athletes on chelsea.

briggs: he shows promise but i thought he was often out of position, and didnt' even seem to be running half the time. the former i can excuse in a players first game, the latter i absolutely cannot. one positive i can say, was that on the myriad occasions where he found himself chasing someone from behind in the box, he didn't foul and give up a penalty.

Dempsey, Dembele and Gera are assets going forward but they received no help from the rest of the squad. the old guys couldnt keep up against chelsea or villa. we need more depth and athleticism in the midfield. and AJ? don't get me started.

Posted by amira on 11/13/2010

chelsea is the best no doubts about it. guys keep it up.

Blog Central: I know this blog boasts far more authority and entertainment value than lesser sites, but have you thought of posting on the Chelsea blog?

Posted by benshadow on 11/13/2010

the blues have to becareful especially on the defence and midfield for them to maintain and retain the title.

Posted by peterd on 11/14/2010

The players are all competent Premiere League quantity, thats the problem, there is no zip or dazzle, no Tevez, Cahill a player who can change a game.. against Newcastle there was just one chance to Dembele..the speculative shots from distance wont cut it

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left