ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Fulham
soccernet blog
Fulham
Posted by Tom Wille on 01/06/2010

It is never a good thing when a club loses a match in the Premier League. It is an even worse thing when a club not only loses a match, but also suffers a relatively serious injury to one of its in form players.

Unfortunately for Fulham, the latter is what took place on Tuesday at the Britannia Stadium as the Cottagers fell 3-2 to Stoke City and lost in form striker Bobby Zamora for an unknown period of time with what is suspected to be a separated shoulder.

It was a miserable for Fulham at the Brittania. Snow was falling, the weather was cold and Stoke was taking it to the Cottagers from the first whistle. In fact, within the first forty minutes, Stoke scored three goals and took a 3-0 lead into the halftime break.

There was a fightback from the Cottagers though as Damien Duff and Clint Dempsey scored second half goals to give Fulham a fighting chance with five minutes to play to get a draw. That did not happen.

What did happen is Fulham played one of its' worst matches of the season thus far. The Cottagers conceded a whopping three goals in a matter of forty first half minutes and that is something that has not happened in a long, long time.

It should be said that defender Brede Hangeland, who did play in the opening half, had to be subbed off at halftime because of a recurring knee injury that kept Hangeland out of the Chelsea match as well on December 28th. If this knee injury continues to be a problem for Hangeland it will be a big issue for the Cottagers as well.

While youngster Chris Smalling has done a decent job in limited appearances for the club this season, it is tough to count on him to fill Hangeland's big shoes and pick up the slack should the lanky Norseman need to miss more time because of the knee injury. The thought of Hangeland missing significant time through injury is one that keeps me awake at night worrying about how this team will cope with his loss and what it will do to Fulham in the Premier League table.

Over the last two years under Roy Hodgson, the defence has been key for Fulham. The Cottagers went from one of the worst defensive teams under Lawrie Sanchez and Chris Coleman to one of the better defensive clubs under Hodgson. One of the main reasons that has happened is because of consistency in the back. Rarely has a league match taken place under Hodgson without Hangeland, Aaron Hughes, John Pantsil, Paul Konchesky and Mark Schwarzer. Unfortunately, John Pantsil is now out for an extender period with a knee injury and the aforementioned Hangeland is now having a knee problem of his own that will likely linger for some time and make him miss more time on the pitch.

This means others will have to step up and take the places of the injured defenders. Whether it be Smalling, Stephen Kelly or someone else, it is imperative that anyone who comes into the starting eleven be focused and ready to play from the opening minute to the final whistle. For a club like Fulham that does not have the depth like some of the bigger clubs, this will be a real test for Roy Hodgson and company. Perhaps this defensive injury crisis will force Hodgson to dip into the transfer market for a defender or two. My guess is that will not happen, but nobody other than Hodgson really knows for sure.

Not only is the defence in trouble because of injuries, but the attack will be without its main weapon for some time as Bobby Zamora dislocated his shoulder at Stoke City on Tuesday and will miss some time while it heals. The disappointing thing about the Zamora injury is that he was in the form of his life. He had surpassed ten league goals and it seemed that everything he got his foot on was finding the back of the net.

Zamora was having the season of his life and was perhaps in line for a call up to the England squad for the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. All that will now be put on hold until he gets back on the pitch. It can be assumed though that he will not pick up right where he left off. It will take him some time to get back into playing shape and to find his form again. Whether he can regain his form the way he was playing before injury is a huge question that will have to be answered over the course of the next few months.

For a team that has been fortunate not to have too many injuries over the past two seasons, 2010 has not started well at all for the Cottagers. The fixture list looks decent over the next month with matches against lowly Pompey, Blackburn, Tottenham, Aston Villa, Bolton and Burnley in league play with an FA Cup 4th round tie against Acrington Stanley or Gillingham on January 23rd.

It is entirely possible that the club will not miss a beat with Zamora, Pantsil and perhaps Hangeland are sidelined. I do not think that will be the case though as these injured players are not just fringe players, but difference makers for both the offense and defence. There will be some big shoes to fill for the real fringe/squad players on the current team.

The old saying is "when the going get tough, the tough get going". Fulham has shown it is a tough team under Roy Hodgson and I have faith that he will get this club to perform at a high level despite the injuries. It may not be pretty on the pitch each and every match, but the Cottagers will find a way to manage and get through this injury riddled period in the season. I have no reason to doubt Hodgson and the squad.

What are your thoughts on the injuries? How do you feel the loss of Pantsil, Zamora and perhaps Hangeland will effect the team? Who do you see stepping in and replacing them in the lineup? Would you prefer Fulham to buy a player or two to replace them or would you rather fill the gap internally?

Comments

Posted by BadgerDawg on 01/07/2010

I really feel they need to get a forward in there. While I will gladly admit I was wrong about Zamora my feelings that they are weak up front are no doubt true today. Nevland and Johnson can't do it so Dempsey is going to have to move up, where he is not nearly as good in my opinion. There are no internal options there, they really need to pick someone up unless Elm is really a player. For the back, I'd put Smaling in there with Baird moving back if necessary.

Posted by nevzter on 01/07/2010

Nice article, Tom. Last season was such a godsend injury-wise for Fulham, and this season is totally converse. If Fulham want to keep a top half finish viable, I feel there's no choice but to buy/loan players, if for nothing else than added depth.

Posted by Chris Canada on 01/07/2010

nevland and johnson are alright, their just to similar, and for the style of play that fulham uses, a target man is needed at all tmes as fulham plays team defence and offence so time is needed to hold up the ball to allow other players to join in on the plays. A pure goal scorer would be nice, but another target man is what is needed first, maybe neil mellor from Preston? or Kevin davies from bolton, hes 33 so maybe would come cheap and hes the perfect target man... as for the backline why not try to get senderos on loan? or maybe even rickets from bolton, he can play anywhere in the back four and has been a bench player since steinson took back his spot, hes not flashy and works hard and didnt cost to much, and i know bolton is doing terrible this season so their players maybe arent the best option, but roy can turn any player into a solid preformer, and with the lack of funds he has, these guys are good options

Posted by Jarrod AL US on 01/08/2010

I think Roy Hodgson is a great manager but these next few weeks are really going to be trying. I think he will probably stick with what he's got due to the favorable schedule for the next few weeks. He will prefer to wait on his injured players to return rather than dipping into the transfer market. He has a small window to decide so either way we will know soon enough. I seem to remember Dempsey stepping up to score some crucial goals for Fulham around this same time a couple of seasons ago. Maybe he can do it again.

Posted by David on 01/08/2010

I like the idea of Keven Davies from Bolton but despite his age I doubt Bolton would part with him cheaply. I know Roy was a fan back when he was manager at Blackburn and spoke highly of him before the last Bolton game.

I assume the likley tandum up front will be Dempsey and Andy Johnson with Gera taking Dempsey's place in the midfield. Given his ability in the air Dempsey has filled the target role fairly well for Zamora in the past.

Seems pretty clear last game that Brede is not at his best. Giving up goals on set pieces is not something that happens when Brede is fully fit. I would rather see a 100% Smalling out there for the time being instead of a compromised Hangeland.

Of all the positions on the pitch I would like to see another playmaker in the midfield brought in the help out Danny Murphy. We have 3 excellent holding/defensive midfielders in Etuhu, Baird and Greening but no other central midfield who can play that playmaker role Murphy does.

Posted by quolo on 01/08/2010

Isn't Simon Davies prepped to return? The upside to moving Dempsey to the front line is that it would make room for Duff & Davies on the wing.

Save that, I think I'd rather see Gera playing off of the other striker than a single striker or Dempsey advance.

Posted by ernest nyaisa on 01/09/2010

Roy must enter the transfer market to bringon defender otherwise it will a worse season for him.

Posted by THE JINGO on 01/09/2010

A more far-fetched thought: Fulham might want to pluck Jonas Gutierrez out of his Championship misery (though I highly doubt Newcastle would let the man go). The guy's a first-team Argentina international and is capable of playing several positions, including left-wing, right-wing and second forward.

Another player for consideration would be Adam Johnson of Middlesbrough (I do realise that he was identified as one to buy in a previous Soccernet article). Pacey left-winger, could enable Dempsey to move up front for the time being if he arrives. And then when Zamora recovers, Fulham will suddenly be spoilt for choice up front.

Personally I think Erik Nevland is the best finisher at the club, Zamora included (and apologies to Clint Dempsey). Perhaps giving him an extended run of games would reap rewards (he's been used so often as a specialist sub this season).

Posted by seanie blue on 01/11/2010

Why can't the writer and the editor of this piece do better jobs? This would fail a high school test on spelling errors alone! Is Soccernet getting sloppier and sloppier, or is it my imagination? And never mind the grammatical potholes: stylistically, this feature is rubbish! Come on guys, do some reporting and some writing and some editing!

Posted by Elliot on 01/11/2010

The defense has been our foundation for the past 2 seasons. Our starting 4 and Schwarzer at the back have become so cohesive, but we should have known that with all the added matches this year, that same hard working group could not last. Need more depth at the defense?. We can't assume that Hughes and Konchesky will be infallible this year, so if anyone can be acquired then yes, acquisitions need to be done quickly. I think this is a greater area of panic than the offense. Our offense is still good enough to get a goal or two a game and keep us at or near the top ten. But I don't think they're capable of the 3 or 4 goals they'll need to make up for the defense. All we need to do is look to our past 2 league games. What happened to us when Pantsil and Hangeland were hobbled? 5 VERY quick and easy goals. We need more Premier League level talent at the defense, even if it's old talent.

Posted by Jensen on 01/11/2010

It's a blog by a club correspondent. It's not an article by a Soccernet writer.

Posted by Chris Canada on 01/12/2010

seanie blue ur a tool, like what Jensen said, its a blog, spelling doesnt matter, i understood what he wanted to say and it made sense, and was a very good article i must say. For you to go to a website dedicated to a sport and look for spelling mistaked makes u a rather odd fellow i must admit, hopefully i spelled something wrong hear to make u a little more annoyed..... and as for defence i agree, stroor should be sold along with adrianik and seoul to raise money, alan hutton would be a good loan option for right back, he doesnt play anyways really i dont think and for center back, if hangeland is out for a while why not sol campbell on a short term deal, or maybe even try out euhu at the back, hes big and strong and has lost his place to baird

Posted by Elliot on 01/12/2010

Etuhu in the defense? Why not. Whenever Baird moves to the back, he seems to become 2 steps slower and 6 inches shorter. He's quite an effective player when he can roam a bit and seems reborn in his new midfield role. But that first Chelsea goal...he was late to the ball and then couldn't reach it when he had the chance. Etuhu's big body could be a welcome presence. I hope Fulham pounces on the Senderos opportunity...

Posted by Sean on 01/15/2010

What are the prospects of David Elm, haven't heard much about him since he was signed. Is he a squad filler, or was he projected to play a role as the season progressed?

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left