ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Fulham
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
Soccernet  Home Correspondents Home
RSS feed
Fulham
Posted by Tom Wille on 09/17/2009

Having looked at the line-up that Roy Hodgson fielded in Fulham's Europa League group stage debut against CSKA Sofia in Bulgaria, I wondered to myself whether the Cottagers were taking this competition seriously. Only keeper David Stockdale and John Paintsil remained in the line-up from Sunday's 2-1 win over Everton. Instead, the likes of 19-year-old central defender Chris Smalling and Stephen Kelly were in the starting line-up in Bulgaria.

While the Cottagers did draw the match 1-1, the bigger question I have is whether the line-up fielded by Roy Hodgson is the type of line-up we will see throughout each of the remaining group stage matches?

There were some solid reserves in the team. Diomansy Kamara, who scored the equalizing goal started and played as did Jonathan Greening, Zoltan Gera, Simon Davies and Erik Nevland. While these players do have some quality, they are a far cry from Andy Johnson, Brede Hangeland, Aaron Hughes and Danny Murphy.

The result was a good one but if Hodgson continued to field a line-up like this I feel the group stage is as far as this Fulham team will advance in this competition with the likes of Basel and Roma also in this group.

Hodgson did say before the match that the Premier League is the priority for the club, and I agree with him. But I would think playing in Europe would be an exciting adventure for the club where he could mesh line-ups with a few more regulars and some reserves rather than a squad full of reserves as we saw for the most part today.

Fulham does not have the most depth in the squad and that has been pointed out all through the summer months leading up to the Europa League debut in late July. Hodgson did add some players over the summer with the hopes of giving the club a bit more strength in all areas of the pitch. He did that, but there is definitely a clear difference in most of the regulars and the reserves.

Having watched Martin O'Neill field a similar weakened line-up during last season's UEFA Cup to the dismay of Villa fans, I wonder if Hodgson is doing the same thing here. Is it me, or does it seem as though the clubs from the bigger leagues in Europe do not take this competition as seriously as the club's from small end Europe. In fact, the two last winners of the UEFA Cup were Shakhtar Donetsk and Zenit St. Petersburg. While Shakhtar and Zenit St. Petersburg are solid clubs, the leagues they represented were not up to the quality of the Premier League, La Liga, the Bundesliga or Serie A. Maybe those clubs like Zenit and Shakhtar were using this competition as a springboard to bigger and better things both domestically and abroad. It was used to lure in new players and establish the clubs as legitimate threats in both the Europa League and Champions League matches.

I am not saying Fulham needs to do this or even can do this, but it would be nice to see the club give it their all in this competition. I know Fulham has a match on Sunday against Wolves, but I would think Hodgson would have been able to field a few regulars in Thursday's match. Unfortunately that was the not the case and I get the feeling we will see similar line-ups the rest of the way through the group stage.

One last thing is that I get the feeling this competition means more to the supporters than it does for the club itself. It is icing on the cake for a job well done last season but means very little to Fulham's big picture. Supporters take trips to all parts of Europe to see the club play in places like Bulgaria, Russia, Belgium, etc. It is a great excuse to see new, less travelled parts of Europe for supporters and at the same time, they get to watch their club play in a big European competition. However, in looking at Fulham on Thursday, I get the feeling as though this competition is just getting in the way of the bigger and more prized Premier League.

I would hate to see Fulham get relegated this season but in looking around the Premier League, I think the Cottagers are well above the other clubs that will be duking it out at the foot of the table. Thus, I would like to see Roy give the supporters a bit more in terms of the line-up going forward in this competition. I do not think it is asking too much and I do not think Fulham is risking that much playing more regulars in this competition. With the new riches of Manchester City and the likes of Tottenham and others playing well to start the season, who knows if and when Fulham will get another crack at a European competition like this. Thus, I would like to see the club make the most of this chance. I do not think that is asking too much. Do you?

So, what were your thoughts on the line-up today? Were you okay with it? What do you the club doing line-up wise going forward in the Europa League?

Comments

Posted by The Wolf on 09/17/2009

In principle, I am in agreement with you.
However, I do back Hodgson's approach after what happened during the match against Amkar Perm match. Fulham simply cannot afford to risk losing players like Andy Johnson, Bobby Zamora, Danny Murphy, Clint Dempsey, etc.
A fall into the relegation heap would quickly follow if a couple of starters went down with injury.
It's unfortunate, but also inevitable given the relatively small squad Fulham has....

Posted by Elliot on 09/18/2009

Total agreement here!
This tournament is an opportunity for Fulham to gain some swagger and improve their depth of play. Having to prepare for different styles of football can give the squad an added creativity for the Premier league. To worry about someone being injured? That's silly. What are we playing for in the premier league? Do we think we're going to crack the top 4? The Europa is going to be as good as it will get for added glory and pride. Why not try to advance in it? The fans deserve better.

I absolutely support the influx of 'some' new faces into the lineup. Good to see Greening, Riise, Baird, Davies, Kamara getting some time. But to clean out the team in such a manner is a very dismal proposition should it be a long term plan. I would hope that Roy's decision would be to field this scaled-down team for away games. I would hope he at least put close to a first team squad for the home games. Fans should be vocal; at Fulham we've suffered too long as second raters.

Posted by Tim on 09/18/2009

Your post is all the more relevant when you take a look at the scoreboard from last night. Big clubs like Panathinaikos, Roma, and Lazio couldn't escape even with a draw. One could easily conclude that the gulph in quality between the lesser-known minnows and the second teams of big European clubs is not as wide as we might think. All the more reason why Hodgson's tactics might not get Fulham out of the group stage.

Posted by David on 09/18/2009

I think the squad selection last night was ok given the situation. The team has what 4 matches in nine days after coming off an international break where most of their players had 2 games as well.

The reality is that Fulham doesn't have to squad depth to field their strongest team against every opponent this year like last year. Zamora, Johnson, and Murphy were all coming off injury. Dempsey has been playing a ridiculous amount of games for Fulham and the US. I think it was reasonable given the compitition to give the bulk of the first teamers a break. And it luckily paid off. I believe part of the problem is also the home-grown rules of the compitition. If you look at the bench last night it was all academy players meant to fullfil that requirement.

I think Roy will field a stronger squad against Roma and Basel. But don't expect all XI of last years starters in every game. it just isn't practicle. Last night squad had plenty of quality players from last years side.

Posted by Theo Mackie on 09/18/2009

Fulham should field a stronger side if Europa League means Champions League qualification. I dont know if it does so could some one please answer this for me?

Posted by pton on 09/18/2009

i wonder why Hodgson didnt buy any 'good quality' play last summer?

Posted by Lord Snow on 09/18/2009

I respectfully disagree with Tom on this post for two main reasons.
First, lest we forget or get greedy, we are only 2 years removed from Fulham needing a Great Escape to avoid relegation. Now some teams look quite poor (Pompey and Hull come to mind), but this is still early on in a long season and they have a lot of time to recover. Our first priority is to remain in the Premiership.

Secondly, the away game this Saturday against Wolves was mentioned, but the rest of the schedule that week is brutal. That Wednesday we have to travel to Man City for a Carling Cup game and then that Saturday we host Arsenal at the Cottage. I think the Roy is waiting to see how that turns out before he commits first teamers to a less winnable (remember Champions League washouts come down after the group stages), longer and more grueling competition. If I were handicapping, I would guess Fulham has a much better chance at the Carling Cup finals than the Europa League Finals.

Posted by El Neilio 10 on 09/18/2009

Compared to what Villa did last year, I totally understand Hodgson's reasoning for resting / rotating players. Fulham really are a team that could quite easily finish top 7 (again) or struggle to stay out of the bottom three.

It made so much sense therefore to rotate the players. As others have stated, this is a very busy time of the season for them, with other games coming thick and fast. I don't think what they did suggests they're regarding the Europa League as the lowest of priorities at all. Later in the comp - then, we'll see whether or not they're taking it seriously (as travelling fans deserve of them).

For now though, the manager wants to avoid burning out his stars. What Villa did last season was crazy. Maybe they want top 4, of course. But in contrast with L'pool giving winning the CL in '05 extra priority over qualifying for the next CL (finished 5th!!!), what Villa did was most peculiar. What's the point in qualifying for Europe if you neglect it when u do!

Posted by Jon on 09/19/2009

Good column. I am a City fan, but am cheering you guys on in Europe. Crushing us at home is a difficult feat for any club (Arsenal will tell you that) and you guys fully merit your spot in Europe.

It's a shame English teams don't take the competition seriously. In the last three years or so City are the only ones to really give the competition a real go (and aside from dreadfully unluckieness in the second leg we'd have gone through to the semis). I think Craven Cottage can be a real fortress for Fulham in Europe. I'm eagerly anticipating your tie against Roma.

As an American I also hope you guys can be the first to play an American in a European final (DaMarcus Beasley was the closest when PSV lost in the last minute against Milan in the semi final of the champions league). Anyways, I digress, good luck Fulham! You've earned your European nights and should enjoy them. They were the best part of our season last year and hope Fulham can make a final!

Posted by Azmin MK on 09/19/2009

I agree with David and El Neillio. Roy Hodgson is definitely taking the Europa Cup seriously. It was just the circumstances that dictated, e.g. injuries, burnout. Hodgson will not do what O'Neill did, no one has to worry about that happening with Fulham. It might not seem like it now, but Hodgson wants to get to the next stage, no doubt about it.

Posted by Hugh on 09/19/2009

Yeah I just don't get it...
Clubs like Fulham and Aston Villa strive for a top 6 finish to get into Europe (top 4 is clearly unattainable)and then treat the tournament with similar contempt to the much maligned Carling Cup! I mean didn't Villa actually go through an arduous pre season qualifying tournament last year? And then they play a second string side in the group games? A cynic might suggest that TV money is the sole purpose of this exercise.

Posted by Nick on 09/19/2009

I would like to see Fulham making the most of their European matches, but I understand Hodgson's approach. CSKA Sofia aren't the strongest of teams, and their result with their reserves squad proves that. I think he spared his first team players for bigger and better games (ie: the EPL game this weekend against Wolves). I expect Fulham to line up with their best team in their next Europa League match

Posted by Allan on 09/21/2009

Aaron Hughes, Andy Johnson and Andy Murphy are not much better than Simon Davies, Zoltan Gera and Greening. In fact, it could be argued that the latter players are better. I still can't believe we spent so much money on useless Andy Johnson.

Posted by austin on 09/29/2009

i really thot fielding such a week squad against CSKA Sofia wasnt a good idea. yes they are a relatively easier club, but i think we should have gotten a win for our first game to show that we are a good club! we are in the group stages now and if we wanna get past that then we have to beat out roma and basel which are both really great clubs. i dont want us to end up like australia has in their asia cup qualifying, cuz now that we gave up points to indonesia of all countries we are in a do or die game next week. fulham dont let us down! show that we are a great club by winning the europa cup!!!

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN