|
|
 |
|
Using public transport in London often means you come into unwanted contact with the personal views of some of the capital's great thinkers. And so it proved on Wednesday evening when yet another crash of my rapidly ailing iPod left me unable to escape the inanities of others' conversations as we crawled along the dread Hammersmith & City Line.
A bunch of jabbering tele-salesmen were loudly discussing the upcoming World Cup and Fabio Capello's initial 30-man selection. Relief was expressed at John Terry's lack of a serious injury after the ridiculous rollercoaster of wild speculation that followed a Chelsea training-ground incident but then a special ire, delivered with no little bile, was aimed at none other than Paul Scholes.
Scholes was recently asked by Capello to reconsider his six-year self-imposed exile from international football. Having been given the time to "sleep" on it, Scholes was not for turning, leaving Capello to plaintively say: "I tried." This, to my rapid-fire correspondent was proof of Scholes' status as a traitor to his country, a status shared by Alan Shearer for his own refusal to play beyond Euro 2000.
The clearly erroneous accusation of Scholes leaving Capello hanging for 18 months was also levelled before my new and unintroduced friends departed for the suburbs at King's Cross to an internal sigh of relief. Theirs was an attitude I, of course, found alien but the concept of footballing national service had been pinpointed in a rather ugly fashion.
The stated reason for Scholes' decision, according to Capello, was that the midfielder "preferred to stay with the family", a reason that would seem perfectly understandable to most. Scholes is famously private and rarely seen out in public without the company of his ginger offspring, often in the stands of Oldham Athletic's Boundary Park. This stranger to China White, Boujis and even Manchester's own Loaf once described his ideal day thus: "Train in the morning, pick up the kids from school, play with them, have tea, get them to bed and then watch a bit of TV."
It also appears that Scholes chose to remain true to a prior commitment as a football coach, as the eponymous figurehead of "Paul Scholes Soccer Academy Week" between June 14 and 17, a time when England will be heading to Cape Town to face Algeria. Over in Orlando, Florida, Scholes, accompanied by Darlington boss Simon Davey, will be honouring an agreement with Tony Shard, a childhood friend from Oldham.
Indeed, until his recent flush back to vintage form with United, Scholes had looked as if his immediate future would lie in such ventures, with few ever seeing him as the type to take on such a public role as that of a football manager. Before a new deal was recently signed, his retirement had been largely expected, and Sir Alex Ferguson has even joked that it was he who would decide when his former fledgling could hang up his boots.
It was back in 2004 that Scholes quit the international scene after 66 caps that eventually saw him unable to replicate the form as a goalscoring midfielder he had shown at United and during his initial burst into the England team. Euro 2004 saw him shunted out to the left wing by Sven Goran Eriksson, who clearly mistook monosyllabism for willingness and wasted the talents of England’s foremost playmaker to shoehorn in the ever incompatible pairing of Gerrard and Lampard.
As for the present day and the tournament-in-waiting, it was to that duo, and perhaps Gareth Barry, that Scholes would be expecting to play deputy. A month of bench-warming would clearly not be for him. The sense of him being able to better influence affairs in a Southern hemisphere winter than in the summer tournament fare he had often wilted in as a result of his asthma and ruddy complexion was an obvious boon but that would be counterbalanced by advancing age and an often static midfield position due to a lack of legs; he cannot offer the versatility that the returning Jamie Carragher may yet provide.
Scholes himself would surely have recognised this and, with his surely-final season approaching, will have wanted to be rested up for the new domestic campaign, having spent a sunshine break with his own kids and those of others who want to become the next Paul Scholes.
Never one to court the celeb life, like former team-mate David Beckham, or to chest-beat and proclaim patriotism like John Terry, Scholes, a singular footballer, chose to make an honest decision that has been respected by England's manager. With apologies to the motormouth and beery tele-salesmen of the Baker Street region, so should everyone else.
Comments
 |
Posted by Andre on 05/13/2010
Some of the greatest minds are found when using public transport. I've heard men dissect elaborate financial modules that probably took years to come up with into such simple suggestions that it would seem retarded ;).
Anyway, I see nothing wrong with Scholes decision. He did his time with the national side. What has me bothered is that Capello actually asked him to come out of retirement. Is England lacking options that much?
 |
Posted by Aaron on 05/13/2010
Other players, of all professional sports, should take notes on how Scholes goes about his business.
He leaves everything on the field. Those who think he is a traitor to country need to relax and take a few more laps on the public transport system.
 |
Posted by Jack Davidson on 05/13/2010
I feel that Paul Scholes days as a top notch player are over.
England are loaded in midfield and its just up to the coach to figure out the best system.
I feel England have a very good chance of winning the world cup.
My only concern is the often lousy referee's.
 |
Posted by Michael Mate on 05/13/2010
@Andre: England do lack options in that department...For all the talents of Gerrard and Lampard,,they are not real playmakers,,they are attacking midfielders,,and advanced playmakers at best,,and thats why they score so many goals..what England really needs is a deep lying playmaker like Alonso,Xavi etc..who can come back to receive the ball from defence and start the attack,,someone who can give pinpoint crossfield balls in the blink of an eye..and also capable of defence splitting passes..this is the reason why Capello has tried to play Lampard here,though hes been decent at best,,and constantly itches to get forward ..and The likes of Barry dont have the required finesse for this..and if you look at the options there aint just any..I dare you to come up with 5 names,,who can remotely play that role
 |
Posted by Siu Pak on 05/14/2010
The other alternative to the deep-lying playmaker role similar to Scholes is his clubmate, Michael Carrick.
 |
Posted by box2boxmf on 05/14/2010
@Mate
I've seen Barry do what you are describing and Milner as well. Carrick is also a good passer when he is on form. Those guys are all in the 30-man squad. We'll see who makes the final cut.
I agree that Gerrard and Lampard are better further up, I'd like to see them together behind Rooney, with the speedsters on the flanks. lol.
 |
Posted by Tom Radford (Australia) on 05/14/2010
@ Michael. I got one name for you, Gerrard!!!
Don't tell me Gerrard cant play in that deep lying playmaker position. He gives you the pinpoint crossfield balls & defence splitting passes that you talk about in your post as well as the abilty to score and make goal saving tackles at the other end. He aint captain fantastic for nothing.... Please Mr Capello, play him there and watch the trophy come home...
 |
Posted by Raizzen on 05/14/2010
@ Michael Mate,
Yea Mate. Scholes on his CURRENT best days, pulled that off rather effortlessly. Its a beauty to watch him play and commandeering the mid so gracefully.
England is definitely short on that department. I think England would reach the quarter at best. I think.
 |
Posted by yeahblah on 05/14/2010
Carrick ...when he was at Tottenham?
Hargreaves ...when he was at Bayern?
Michael Mate, I see your point...
 |
Posted by TWINKLE DREADA on 05/14/2010
time back, somebody had the audacity of thinking Lampard would ever be a better prospect than Scoles: remember Euro 2004 vs France, England 1-0, 60 mins gone, the English with all the momentum. out comes Scholes and Lampard takes his place. we all remember the disaster that then ensued. somebody has to apologise first to Scholes for that ultimate insult before people continue to feel aggrieved.
 |
Posted by Brian on 05/14/2010
Paul Scholes has over the years served his club and his country well. He has always been the epitome of the true proffessional, his patriotism is beyond question and those who would argue differently have no clue of which they speak.
I have no doubt that he could play a key part in England's midfield, his ability to spray passes all over the park is still second to none.
He chose to retire from the International scene some 6 years ago, he did it of his own volition and for his own very good reasons, none of which has changed.We could only wish that more players in the game displayed the integrity that Paul Scholes has throughtout his brilliant career.
It speaks volumes to me of the parlous state of english talent inasmuch as we need to ask him to consider coming out of retirement.
Paul Scholes owes nothing to England but football owes much to him and his strength of character. It will be a sad day for all of football when he hangs up his boots for the last time.
 |
Posted by Ivan Khedhr on 05/14/2010
Michael Carrick is probably the only real centre midfield who can barely do what Scholes does at Man United. I suspect England to reach quarter final (maybe semis if they get lucky but thats it).
 |
Posted by James on 05/14/2010
Good article, my sentiments exactly.I agree with his decision also and he does not even warrant a place in the current side but that said, it was criminal when he was put on the left wing to accommodate Lampard in 2004. He may not have scored in an England shirt for a couple of years but he was still Paul Scholes - playmaker and goal creator extraordinaire. No wonder he retired and why would he want to come back into the same fray anyway?
 |
Posted by Don on 05/15/2010
Jimmy Bullard, Jimmy Bullard, Jimmy Bullard, Jimmy Bullard, oh and slow poke Carrick
 |
Posted by lister igah on 05/16/2010
I keep saying tim and time again.
Paul Scholes is my fav player ever, for his modesty, meekness and midfield display, only compared to Xavi of today. Ask the Lengend Zinedine Zidane
 |
Posted by Wale Adediran on 05/16/2010
Sven Erickson wasted the best talent England ever had at Euro 2004. Shunting Scholes left was an insult to the guy. Dont see them going far with one dimensional Lampard in the middle anyways.
 |
Posted by Nicks E.N. on 05/16/2010
Do you think Capeelo knows what he is doing? The man is a greenhorn in International Football management. Scholes is right to turn down Capello's offer. Scholes has his integrity intact and after what WILL be a show of shame in SA, Scholesy will have the last laugh.
Capello not good enough, England dumped out in the first round!
 |
Posted by Abbey on 05/16/2010
Sincerely speaking scholes is d best in that departmnt presently, since he cant be forced 2 play 4 england Capello should stick to Gerrard & also work on Carric. I believe wt those two players England can get to final & Lampard should be giving d role of atackig midfielder.
 |
Posted by ABBA on 05/17/2010
We can safely assume the jabbering tele-salesmen would not have declined an invitation to play in the World Cup.
Can't blame them. More than 99% of the population would probably give a leg or two to get a call like that from Capello. They would too.
Not like it'd matter though. They wouldn't make the team anyway.
 |
Posted by ABBA on 05/17/2010
While it's easy to make a case for Scholes' inclusion because of his saintly demeanour, it's worthwhile considering whether he'd actually add to the team.
It's true that no one else can link play and dictate an attacking tempo quite like him. However while his playmaking skills have never been in question, the fact is his utter inability to tackle is almost criminal for a central midefielder in this day and age.
It's difficult to imagine him starting. Would Capello sacrifice either Lampard or Gerrard to accomodate his ageing legs from the off? And it's harder to think of him as an impact substitute if England were chasing the game: why risk going a man down when he'd inevitably stick a leg out trying to stop a counter-attack?
If included his playing time could be limited to the last group game if England secures qualification early, or in the closing stages of winning matches so they'd keep the ball better.
Preferring his family over either prospect is hardly traitorous.
 |
Posted by Hans Andoh on 05/17/2010
@tom
Micheal's Right.There is a difference in Scholes' style of play and that of those mentioned by Micheal(Gerrard,Lampard and co.).None can be compared with Paul ,Scholes as far as passing is concerned.His crossfield passing is Impeccable.No disrespect to Grerard and Lampard.They are terrific ,World class midfielders but Scholes is a step above them in that department.Scholes' vision and technical ability will earn him a place in any top club in the world.
 |
Posted by Ortega on 05/17/2010
master passer, orchestrator, master creator, the man who knows how to raise n slow the tempo of any game in any situation....in all simply the best England can have in that position...and he's given his time to the nation to full effort and dedication, but got insulted by the monster Sven. now time for him to give dat Barton to who was preferred to him during Euro 2004..........March on Englad, he cud never be a traitor if not a hero for his country, shame England can't still get the new Scholsy yet the best near him Carrick remains to be overlooked for the incompatible pair of Gerrard n Lampard
 |
Posted by cantona7 on 05/17/2010
I agree Gerrard can technically do Scholes' job, he's almost as good as Scholes' at that, but he just would not do it, because he is Stevie Me, he wants THE attention. Scholes' job needs somebody modest and humble, Gerrard doesnt have that. Steven Gerrard cannot stand the sight of other players getting the attention, that is why he cannot play with Lampard.
Lampard is no way a playmaker. He is a fox from outside the box.
Paul Scholes is one of my favourite player. Gerrard is one of my favourite goalscorer because he has scored a lot of beautiful goals.
 |
Posted by Sri on 05/18/2010
In my opinion, the reason Capello asked Scholes to make a come back is 'cos of the way he beautifully links up with Rooney at club level. For England to be involved in the final days of the world cup, Rooney needs to be at his best and Scholesy can help with that. They know each other's wavelengths and contribute so much to Man Utd.
 |
Posted by fashion52 on 05/18/2010
It speaks volumes to me of the parlous state of english talent inasmuch as we need to ask him to consider coming out of retirement
please visit:http:// www.xcfashion.com/22usd-wholeslae-nfl-mlb-nba-jerseys-accept-paypal All styles, colors. Compare prices, do not miss it
 |
Posted by majik on 05/18/2010
Paul Scholes is a good player we all agree. His time in an England shirt has passed and he is a big enough player to know and understand this. He is no traitor.
I see no problems with Capello's other options in midfield. They have class and ability, and are consistent performers. Defence splitting passes, vision? I think there's plenty, check the highlight reels from the EPL and count how many assists the midfielders in Capello squad have.
I believe Capello has already proven what he can do with this team. He picks them on what they can contribute to the team, not just as individuals.
and who says Gerrard and Lampard can't work together? are we better than Capello? I think not. And I tip Lampard for the golden boot.
Posted by Voice on 05/18/2010
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|
|
|
|
About
| John Brewin joined Soccernet in 2000 and has been editor of the site since 2004. Hailing from the Cheshire town of Macclesfield he currently resides in East London (alone). He has covered every major international tournament since Euro 2000 and has attended six European club finals. |
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|