ESPN Soccernet - Editor's Blog
soccernet blog
Soccernet Home Soccernet Home
Soccernet  Home Blogs Home
RSS feed
Editor's Blog
Posted by John Brewin on 09/03/2009

During those weeks of the season when we're concentrating on domestic action you'll be able to catch our regular "Premier League Heroes" feature. This week, however, sees international football take centre-stage as World Cup qualifying nears its business end.

One team with hopes just alive of being in South Africa next summer are Ukraine, in Group 6, behind runaway leaders England. When they face Andorra on Saturday, they may well call on the talents of a man who must surely rank as a Premier League zero; Andriy Shevchenko, who last Friday ended his time at Chelsea, an association that finished with much more a whimper than a bang. Contract paid up, "Sheva" rejoined Dynamo Kiev, the club where he once made his name, paying glowing tribute to Roman Abramovich as he went, his exit a mere footnote on a day of constantly breaking transfer news.

He left for no fee where it once took £30m paid to AC Milan to secure his services in the summer of 2006 and augment a Blues team that were looking for three titles in a row. Most, including myself, considered his addition another nail in the rest of the Premier League's coffins. I recall watching his debut for Chelsea in the Community Shield that August. A well-taken strike against Liverpool caused me and a pal to drink up and leave a Toulouse watering hole in resignation that this would be another season of domination for Jose Mourinho's team.

Yet it was not to be. Just over four months later came my next encounter with the striker who once terrorised defences across Europe. As Macclesfield Town were thrashed in the Third Round of the FA Cup at Stamford Bridge one man stood out as a performer struggling to live with the gap in class as a lower division team were pulled apart. Problem was, he was playing up front for Chelsea. Shevchenko slipped, slid, mis-controlled and miscued his way through 90 minutes of ineptitude that cheered the travelling Macc faithful no end as their stricken team ended the game with just nine men on the pitch.

At the end of that game a sporting Mourinho took the trouble to shake the hands of every Macc player. He looked far less impressed with Shevchenko, left to suffer for the full match while the likes of Frank Lampard, Ashley Cole and Salamon Kalou were allowed to take their leave and head for the warmth of the dug-out.

By then, whispers had begun of the Portuguese manager's unhappiness with a player said to have been foisted on him by Abramovich, who had enjoyed a long-running friendship with the player before finally tempting him away from Italy after seven goal-filled years. Mourinho's tactics, hugely successful at that, had centred around playing one striker, a target-man, and his name was Didier Drogba. Shevchenko, apart from no longer being the quicksilver goal-machine of Serie A yore, was not that player and neither was he an ideal partner for the Ivorian. Nor could his goal tally justify his place; he left Chelsea with just seven league goals to his name.

Counter-rumours of Abramovich annoyance that his prize asset was not being assimilated were also rife. One thing for certain is that the Russian and Portuguese alliance ended in October 2007, just over a year after world domination had been predicted by so many. Mourinho left by a "mutual consent" that most personified as the pair's relationship reaching breaking point. Ever since that moment, Chelsea have failed to emulate the pre-eminence of the Mourinho era.

Carlo Ancelotti, the latest entrusted with that task, was in charge of Shevchenko last season, during a loan spell back at AC Milan that yielded just two goals in 26 appearances. Back at Chelsea, at the start of this season, it came as a shock to see a familiar face, hair perhaps a little longer, coming on as a sub at Sunderland. The four minutes he was granted at the Stadium of Light were the 32-year-old's last in a Chelsea shirt. The Italian, and perhaps Abramovich too, had clearly seen enough.

After £30m wasted on a possible cause of the breakdown of an alliance that had brought unmatched success to Stamford Bridge, it is little wonder that there was a rather muted publicising of his departure by the Chelsea PR machine. Even in the glaring light of the Gael Kakuta affair, Andriy Shevchenko must surely rank as the club's worst ever signing and, in value for money terms alone, the most disastrous of the Premier League era.

Comments

Posted by Emily on 09/04/2009

I think you must have forgotton ppl like Diego Forlan and Juan Sebastien Veron. Without pulling in other examples, and looking at the history of the epl and other teams, this line - 'in value for money terms alone, the most disastrous of the Premier League era' is hardly credible in any sense of the word.

Posted by Sami Thompson on 09/04/2009

I must fully agree! It became obvious rather too quickly that something was wry with Sheva soon after he put on the blue shirt. It saddens me that his days as a Blue will not be fondly remembered, though how appropriate for Sheva to settle on 7 league goals. I must say though I am very proud of how the Chelsea faithful treated him with so much love and how he always worked hard to do his best for his club. Sheva is a true professional and I really hope he finds his goal scoring form again and that he comes to play in the USA before he hangs up the boots! Sheva we love you still and thanks for that awesome goal against Tottenham!!

Posted by Steve on 09/04/2009

Well written John. In response to Emily, you cannot compare Sheva to Forlan who only cost £6.9 million and went on to achieve greater things after Man Utd. Veron was an expensive flop but remember he won a Premier League winners medal in 2003. Good luck Sheva, I hope you do better at Dynamo Kiev!

Posted by ola on 09/04/2009

I was saddened by the non-adaptation of the great 'Sheva" to life in London. Sheva, you are still my favourite striker after the original RONALDO. you sure have the blues fans best wishes with you as you seek your goal scoring form back.

Posted by JY on 09/04/2009

Emily, I think you also forgot that none of them cost as much as Shevchenko, especially for Forlan's case, and both scored more goals than Sheva. So what's wrong with John Brewin's assessment?

Do you have another example of a 30+ million player scoring less than 7 league goals?

Posted by Olaseni on 09/04/2009

John I think your article is a very unfair appraisal of Sheva. Did he have a terrible time in the EPL? Yes. But to imply that his lack of success was his doing is unjust unfair and a total misrepresentation of the abilities of a man who's arguably won more team and individual honours than any of the current Chelsea line-up. As you rightly noted, Sheva was not the striker that Jose favoured and the lack of confidence from his manager did more harm than good to him.
In any case he remains for some of us the 2nd best forward in the modern game, 2nd only to the real Ronaldo.
Sheva, thanks for the many beautiful goals, we wish you all the best as you move your career forward.

Posted by Kevin on 09/04/2009

Wow... 30 million pounds for 7 league goals. That's about 4 million per league goal... What a return on investment! =P

Posted by yin-rong on 09/04/2009

While his time at Chelsea has been nothing short of horrendous, one cannot help but feel some pity for the Ukrainian. Once regarded as one of the deadliest strikers around with his calm finishing and poise, his transfer triggered a downward spiral that hasn't been reversed till this day. He simply couldn't cope with the pressure and pace of the EPL. Who knows what other landmarks that he might have achieved if he stayed at AC Milan? What a wasted talent....

Posted by paulo on 09/04/2009

Fake player! I always doubted his quality and i had bet that he will be a flop. A milan team with Kaka, Pirlo and Seedorf will make any average player look good due to he support and supply abound. Sheva was never world class. Not in the class of Eto'o, Ronaldo, Henry and Drogba... He is not worthy to even tie their laces...

Posted by brij on 09/04/2009

i feel that he was a pawn in the owner manager game and fell to depths that were difficult to recover from - however this move to kiev should have come earlier where his confidence could have been given a boost - lets wait and watch - by the year end, he could still become hot again

Posted by bonny on 09/04/2009

a bit harsh i must admit,but no use mincing with words.he was just that...A TOTAL FLOP!!!!!!i like sheva as a footballer,but he just did'nt cut it in the epl and went from bad to zero.
glad chelski did gracefully release him from his misery,coz he was never gonna be the sheva of old again.
best of luck andriy...no 7 for 7 league goals...now thats a coincidence of sorts lol!!!!!

Posted by jason on 09/05/2009

That's Berwin's point exactly: that Sheva not only didn't score, he didn't fit in, and that his signing eventually led to Mourinho's departure.

Posted by the bikinibandit on 09/05/2009

@paulo: that's very harsh from you, mate.
even with the likes of Kaka and co. in AC Milan midfield, you can expect a cow to play upfront and score goals like Sheva did for them, can you?
he was always quality, even from his early days at Dinamo Kiev.
I remember MATCH Magazine (a long long time ago now) once put him as the most deadliest striker on the planet.
Sheva will always have my respect. Good luck for him to kick start his career at Kiev!

Posted by Rays on 09/05/2009

Sheva is one of the best striker when he come into EPL and the goal he score againts Liverpool on the opening match is just pure class that worry every defender. But the way Chelsea play with single Strong center forward is just not suit him well and he doesn't not seem confident after that.

Posted by qasim on 09/05/2009

to emily. . .forlan didn't cost much. . and don't forget he scored twice vs. liverpool (when dudek messed up) and a winner against chelsea (in the 4th minute of stoppage time). . i think to any united fan. . . those goals are priceless, and he cost only 7 odd million. not to mention. . Veron. . .who. .was a flop in terms. . .but still wasn't all that bad. . and. . when united sold him to chelsea. . got back £15million of the £28 million paid. thts still only a £13 million flop. . instead of £30million.

Posted by Mark on 09/06/2009

Good article. I guess when you try to attach monetary value you need to include wages - £112k per week for a couple of years is £10m plus. So wages and transfer fee would be c. £42m or £6m per goal - against Macclesfield Town! That would be more that the whole of the Macclesfield team cost.

Perhaps the nearest comparison is another Chelsea signing, Winston Bogarde, who was on £40k per week and trained with the youth team for 3 years.

Posted by Justin on 09/06/2009

Sheva was a class act when he came to Chelsea. The problem was exactly as you pointed out - he didn't fit into the system, and more importantly, his manager didn't want him to succeed. Yes - I'm convinced that Mourinho, arrogant fella that he is - didn't like having a player shoved in his face and forced into his 1st team - even though that player was a superb one like Sheva.

Thus, he stuck to his system and didn't bother to tweak the team's tactics to better suite Sheva's game. It's hard for a striker to flourish in such teams, as the opportunities that come a striker's way depends v.much on the opportunities the team makes for him.

Look at Forlan - same case. Fergie didn't know how to accomodate him, and so he's gone on to flourish in the Liga, which is a similarly top league.

Sad for Sheva - maybe Fergie may have used him better!

Posted by BENSON on 09/07/2009

It is never fair to judge shevchenko like that.
The biggest problem for sheva is mourinho. No matter how good a striker is, when you asked him to play a role he is not adapted to, he will not perform. Drogba had all the glory when shevchenko was there. I remember the goal drogba scored against Everton. It was sheva who head the ball to him. Drogba shouldered the glory but sheva shouldered the blame.

And how about some wonder strikes such as long range efforts against Aston Villa and tottenham? There were a lot of glimpes of the real sheva but at that time, he was playing few games and appparently, mourinho does not want him to shine.

I am disappointed by Chelsea for failing to regconise the talent in Sheva, so many honours before him and he was called a flop? Ridiculous. As a chelsea fan myself, good luck in your time back with dynamo!

Posted by ABBA on 09/07/2009

@ Justin:

Forlan was definitely not the "same case". Very much unlike how Mourinho treated Sheva, Fergie did want Forlan to succeed and played a system that suited his playing style and attributes (Forlan was not much different from, say, Dwight Yorke, and the tactics employed in their respective eras were roughly the same). It was simply the case that Forlan couldn't deliver.

Additionally, just because a player may have flourished in La Liga does not mean he is top class - remember some of those who have contested the Pichichi award (if not won it) include players of generally patchy quality such as Salva, Mista, and perhaps to a lesser extent Dani Guiza and Diego Tristan.

Posted by ... on 09/07/2009

Shevchenko is still very good striker with exceptional finishing skills.I think that its all down to bad luck during his years at chelsea. He didn't start a lot of games, and coupled with the lack of faith in his manager and the need to adapt to the EPL, it's gonnna be hard for sheva. I believe technique and skill will never be lost as the years go by. Look at what he have done at AC milan, scoring goals for fun. Let's just remember the positive about him and forget all about him being a flop at chelsea. With due respect, sheva, good luck.

Posted by Dave on 09/25/2009

it just goes to show that players are only as good as the system and the manager that employs them in the system. Without the midfield service, lampard and co. shooting instead of passing he was just ordinary

Posted by Bob 3 weeks, 1 day ago

I think shevchenko would have flourished at a team like man utd. The Chelsea team under mourinho had only space for 1 person and that person was drogba. The few games the Ukrainian featured in , allowed us to catch glimpses of his brilliance. But then the Chelsea midfield didn't have players comparable to kaka, pirlo or seedorf ; It was the supply of these players that made shevchenko the feared striker we remember. In man utd , he would have had similar supplies from scholes , giggs , carrick etc. In my mind, i still view him as one of the best strikers of all time. Mourinho , just took subtle cracks at his confidence . I do admit he did a good job of it though !

Posted by john Fagan 3 weeks ago

i think u have to consider u brought this player , no doubt he is world class , but if the manager does not want him , then he will go no where , for me u have to question the manager ( special One ) is he so good

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
John Brewin joined Soccernet in 2000 and has been editor of the site since 2004. Hailing from the Cheshire town of Macclesfield he currently resides in East London (alone). He has covered every major international tournament since Euro 2000 and has attended six European club finals.
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
© ESPN Soccernet 2009
Cricinfo
Soccernet
ESPN