ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Chelsea
soccernet blog
Chelsea
Posted by David Kyle on 08/15/2011

The three-month wait is at an end, the friendlies are over, the signings have (or haven't) been made and the first match of 38 is over. So, that is why a 0-0 draw in your opening Premier League game is a disappointment. Regardless of how you played, the three month wait boils down to that first game.

I think in post-match post-mortem, it was better than OK. It's not three points, but there's lots to remain upbeat about.


Fighting Fire With Fire - Chelsea's strength kept them in this one ©AP Photos

There are a great amount of plusses to take from Sunday, looking at Monday morning's press they are uninspired by Chelsea.

Looking at our opposition for the title however, none seemed to have to fight like Chelsea did , I have always praised our ability for a scrap. We may have the largest wage bill in the league, but that doesn't come with a lack of want from our 11.

Man United have the ability to pop up and score late goals - not a matter of fluke, but fitness and desire, whilst Liverpool have striking quality. Man City are an unknown entity once again, I don't think they have the right manager in place, and Arsenal similar to what they were last season but worse. Predictability, passing, pace.... no Fabregas, no Clichy and probably no Nasri.

Defensively, on Sunday, I thought we were supreme. Alex and Terry were absolute rocks at the back. Nothing went awry in situations where it was as if Stoke had cannon shooting footballs 80-feet in the air in the general direction of Kenwyne Jones' feet/head/body.

Put Arsenal, United or Liverpool in that situation and I think they would have struggled. Stoke were geed up, simple as. They knew they could make the best of starts to their season by getting something against Chelsea.

AVB commented on their physicality, I think it should be embraced. I always take pride in the way that Chelsea don't take a bullying from the stronger sides, Terry epitomises that. Whilst Stoke are the epitome of resilience, there is not too much face lost in the dropped two points.

There wasn't anything clever about their play, but I am a great advocate of football being played well does not necessarily mean overhead kicks, stepovers and intricate passing. Stoke play football well in the sense that they have an overawing power as a unit - meaty defending, strong attackers - and an ability to supply the ball from anywhere within their attacking half, whether by throw or set-piece.

So on that note Chelsea should be heavily praised.

Some useless hack at The Times deemed Ashley Cole's performance as a five-out-of-ten, which is an insult. He was superb defensively and gutsy going forward. The same can be said for, wait for it, Jose Bosingwa. Who undoubtedly put in his best performance for Chelsea to date.

There was none of his usual dallying, and as a striking threat - which commentators are so quick to remind us he has bundles of - was very useful indeed.

Mikel is often on the end of my criticism. His performance yesterday was assured, his passing better and his shot phenomenal. Add to the fact that his personal issues with his kidnapped father and he comes in for some heavy praise indeed.

Man-of-the-match Fernando Torres put in a performance that showed some much endeavour and effort that he truly put his accompanying "wingers" to shame. His work rate was fantastic and the fact that he is being so heavily lauded in the press today is a relief all round. I think as a fan you want to see your players do well so you avoid the stick that comes with it, the comments on Torres at my work today felt like a compliment to me!

Torres will forever, well until he becomes prolific, be dissected by spectators and the media alike. You get what you deserve in football and if you work hard enough will get just rewards. He wasn't effortless last season, but yesterday seemed to have regained his edge. He has a point to prove, what better way to do it than to start notching up some goals.

I have touched upon the so-called wingers we adopted, I think I will put in as much effort writing about them as they did in the match. Malouda has turned from a world beater into a self server. So many times you will see him run, players get into positions of value and he will either take one more touch or shoot from range. He needs to sort his act out, I commented yesterday during the game on twitter that he is making himself extremely replaceable.

Kalou is a constant source of frustration for me, I cannot see the value in him starting for us. Yesterday is possibly an exception, he provides a pacier option when compared to Anelka. But he just can't put that pace to good use. He is a good sub, without question. But as a starter, can't cut it.

Anybody of differing opinion I ask you to watch him closely. Yesterday when Kalou gets the ball he will often make a pass, but not the easy, short and direct option. He will make a pass into space where the receiver will have to work their socks off in order to get it. The point in being part of a team like Chelsea is passing should be a straight forward almost telepathic experience. Kalou's telepathy is well off, so much so it seemed he was tuning into Stoke rather than Chelsea.

Sturridge, once his three match ban is up, would make a worthier contender for that role. His prowess in front of goal betters that of Kalou, and yesterday there was sign that Torres isn't restricted to the central role - freeing up the "wingers" to get central and attack.

I've already said I was disappointed with the one point. It is worth remembering that was the same total we took from Stoke away last season, and as you may have read it is a "fortress" - although as somebody kindly pointed out yesterday "since when did it turn into the Camp Nou". A point we should take on board, to be Champions you have to win the tough games as well, I think we have it in our locker.

What we do need in our locker though is an extra something special, we are lacking the killer pass at the moment. You will never score goals without providing for the attack, something Stoke could do yesterday - albeit in a Drogba-on-the-pitch kind of way. We can't forever rely on our classier version of hit and hope, something's got to give. Hopefully it is one Russians' purse strings, and within the next 16 days.

Thirty seven matches left to go. Keep The Blue Flag Flying High!


Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter

Comments

Posted by clem aye on 08/15/2011

yes lots to think about, lots of plusses but still 1 point and an opposition we should have beaten. Its clear AVB's reaarch was not so good as it should hv been made clear to him that Stoke are really physical. and its going to be like that with every PL match. So we need to get our act together on that front. We really need to get physical. I think also, AVB should hv been advised that Yossi should play to support Torres. Had he started with Torres, i think it would be a very different match. As it was Kalou and Malouda were not really very effective. I really hope that this is going to improve.

Posted by Nithin on 08/15/2011

hahahaha....well said..."Kalou's telepathy is well off, so much so it seemed he was tuning into Stoke rather than Chelsea" was nicely said..i always thght kalou never developed since coming to Chelsea and he always wasted chances after chances and his passing is getting worse than Stoke winning EPL.
I hope we buy 2 wingers and sell kalou and Malouda off and last but not least we need a playmaker and i would love to have Sneidjer rather than Modric as Sneidjer has already played in Spain and Italy and he is much better for the money we spent.

Posted by Nithin on 08/15/2011

hahahaha....well said..."Kalou's telepathy is well off, so much so it seemed he was tuning into Stoke rather than Chelsea" was nicely said..i always thght kalou never developed since coming to Chelsea and he always wasted chances after chances and his passing is getting worse than Stoke winning EPL.
I hope we buy 2 wingers and sell kalou and Malouda off and last but not least we need a playmaker and i would love to have Sneidjer rather than Modric as Sneidjer has already played in Spain and Italy and he is much better for the money we spent.

Posted by john on 08/16/2011

I must say it a wonderful explanation and observation of the match,also hoping we could come back to win our next match. Up chelsea!

Posted by Gary on 08/16/2011

Man City has certainly found a new bag of tricks in Aguero. The moment he hit the pitch yesterday everything changed. While Chelsea is bogged down with more of the same; City has proof that one specialized player can make the difference. So what’s the answer for Chelsea? We need someone who plays wide as a winger, but can also cut in and unlock defences. Someone who can provide a final killer pass but is accurate when called on to shoot. AVB; it’s obvious; we are talking about Neymar.

Posted by mike on 08/16/2011

as i have said before, chelsea is missing arjen robben, and a healthy essien. kun should have been a blue last year instead of torres and a replacement for lampard should have been groomed for a more prominant role this year... mceachern is a good 2 years away from any serious time on the pitch...

as for bosingwa his crosses were a disaster, lets hope ivanovic is fit so he can make an impact on set pieces... we obviosly do not have the creativity to score multiple goals in open play...

our formation was not strong either... hopefully once healthy we can field the below team...

Cech

Ivanovic Luiz Terry Cole

Mikel

Lampard Ramires

Anelka Torres

Drogba

Posted by emma on 08/17/2011

the earlier the better we get realy in to the league and be in charge.all involve should wake up to action(REAL ONE).ALL DA BEST DA BLUES

Posted by Maestro on 08/17/2011

A candid piece. Hope we get a playmaker n believe me u, we ar set to knock Man United off their perch.

Posted by Biyi Adeyemi on 08/17/2011

Completely agree with you David; Kalou to me on Sunday didn't really cut it as a starter...I would rather we continue to use him as a super sub as he contributes more coming from the bench. Like you mentioned, Sturridge was sorely missed yesterday...can't wait for him to be back.

Posted by Michael on 08/18/2011

I couldn't agree more, midfield imagination is what is needed. Lamps had an ordinary game, Malouda was useless and Ramires did just enough. But where's the imagination???

Posted by Gonzo on 08/18/2011

The Blues can and will do better. SuperFrank said it himself, playing Stoke is all about their long throws and set pices and physical play. It's difficult to get into a good flow and passing rhythm. I think Chelsea has enough quality to play better, but I'd rather build-up and keep getting better throughout the season that start out great and sputter in the middle like last season. I think McEachran can and should play now, he has all the quality you could ask for and he's tough. Kalou and Mikel should be reserves and Carling/FA cup starters only.

Posted by John Lyons on 08/18/2011

I don't know why everyone complains about Kalou. He may not always have the greatests games but he has been a loyal servant for Chelsea and scored some really important goals for us. Just like the compliants I always hear about Drogba.Look what Drogba has won for us over the years we need to show more respect for Kalou, Malouda, Anelka and Drogba. These guys have done more than Kerry Dixon or David Speedie or Robert Flex ever achieved in a blue shirt. Torres can not score goals and is not as good as people make him out to be.He is a liability for Chelsea

Posted by Waleed Aoudi on 08/19/2011

Totally agree with you my man, after watching Barcelona play yesterday, a few days after watching that disappointing draw against stoke, and being reminded of those insane Messi and Xavi passes through Pepe and Carvalho I must say i felt a tingle rushing down my spine that felt more like a wake up call... if we want that kind of play at the Bridge we're going to need modric or moutinho (Preferably Modric!!!)

Posted by frankyiba on 08/19/2011

how can u be so charitable to malouda? he is the worst player chelsea have had in a decade

Posted by Segun on 08/20/2011

Arsenal, Man Utd and Liverpool could have beaten Stoke City under same condition, but all depends on a team that's on its good day.

People think Arsenal is depleted but I think, whatever! Arsenal is still a big club and has a chance of winning the EPL than Man City.

Posted by Brad on 08/20/2011

Going to Stoke in the EPL is always a difficult challenge as of late. I feel Chelsea out performed stoke. The only thing missing was the most important thing. A goal. Torres played lights out and deserved a goal. This week vs West Brom, Chelsea has looked flat thus far. They just scored to go up, but there are possession issues in midfield at Stamford bridge. AVB subbed Torres and brought on Drogba. Torres needs to play at least 80-85 minutes a match to get back to where he was. This 4-3-3 formation is a thing of the past in London. Buy a midfielder who can control the center, and play Drogba directly behind Torres. Stagger them with more of a 1-1 off-set. You have 2 world class strikers, and you are subbing one for the other?? Use what you have. This 4-3-3 is dull and with the style players they have will not work. You have wingers playing in the way of your strikers. Sell them and let the strikers shine. There is no room for the kind of movement Torres is capable of.

Posted by custom writing on 08/26/2011

Great Post! Thanks for giving detailed description about blog.

Posted by rabiu on 09/05/2011

i love u Torres am u no.one fan,u the best striker in the world ma dreams is to be like u one day I LOVE U

Posted by tony antoniou on 12/19/2011

peter Cech did not lose the match for us it was the manager. why would you pull off the two best players on the pitch with 30 minutes to go and only leading 1-0 away from home when it was so vital for us to gain the 3 points to keep in touch with the top 3.
yes if we were 2-0 up then very different, once Wigan had scored there was no way back. we should have attacked and scored again before removing Mata and Sturridge. poor Management at the highest level

Posted by EMMANUEL EDE UDEH on 12/19/2011

Hello all the chelsea fc management,there is something chelsea team are lack in attacking front there is no good position for the strikers knowing well that you will see winger crossing ball inside 18yard box but the way the strike position it will find it difficult seeing them scoring by heading take look at Man uted the way they normal compose there self inside 18yard that is why the attacking is very good,but you see chelsea player standing at the same place which is very bad they must work on that
Emmanuel U

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Phil Lythell Phil Lythell is a Chelsea season ticket holder and lifelong Blues supporter stretching back to the sepia-tinted days of Kerry Dixon and Pat Nevin. Author of Chelsea-centric blog ShoutyandSpitty.com, Phil has spent his entire life living within a 20 minute walk of Stamford Bridge which has cost him a fortune but has also kept him from those interminable queues outside Fulham Broadway Station giving him more time in the pub to discuss the latest glorious/calamitous/insipid match.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives