ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Chelsea
soccernet blog
Chelsea
Posted by David Kyle on 02/07/2011

The Torres Show didn't start with the happy beginning we have all been hoping for this past week, but he can't be blamed for what was all in a performance where we were tactically weaker than our opponents.

It is a painful moment when you look at a game against your nemesis and have to hold you hands up and say that defeat was probably the deserved outcome.

Lot's of blame is being placed on Ancelotti's tactics once more, but surely his tactics don't involve rendering a whole midfield anonymous.


Imagine the score if he had been a Liverpool player! ©Getty Images

Liverpool played a good game, they knew exactly what to do and that was shut off all traffic to the front man.

It wouldn't matter if your front line consisted of Pele and Maradona, if there was no decent service you still wouldn't score. Liverpool stifled this.

The most disappointing part of all this was that it was a battle of midfields, there's was stronger than ours. Their defence, when rarely probed, looked tentative at best.

Carragher made an exceptional block on Torres in the first half, but aside from that when we did press it didn't look like it would be difficult to break them down.

Even more disappointing is we lost to a team who basically didn't have an attacker, our defence shouldn't have been as tested as it actually was.

It was in the centre of the field where Lampard, Mikel and Essien combined to put in the worst collective performance of a midfield this season.

Essien's passing was once again frustratingly astray constantly, and Lampard was quiet and ineffective - his repertoire limited to annoying little chips that ended either above our player or short at the feet of a man in red.

Mikel, not the same player I was praising at the start of the season, basically made himself null and void for the rest of the game by getting a booking within 30 seconds.

This is where Carlo needs to accept some responsibility, Mikel should have been replaced at half time with Essien reverting into the holding role and Malouda coming on as a creative spark.

I'm often criticised for my opinion that Essien should play in the holding role, because we would otherwise be holding back his attacking prowess. Essien does not have attacking prowess, he has physical brute force that allows him to make the runs forward, these can still happen if we have somebody to cover for him when making a rare foray upfield.

Mikel has gone back to the old Mikel, and it appears that Essien has also turned into the old Mikel. Between them they cannot string a good pass together. It is intensely frustrating to watch two players who can't even find their own players.

I'm waiting for a backlash as Mikel has been picked by many managers therefore he must be good etc etc. This is just my opinion, Essien is a far better option in the holding role, physically strong and usually decisive on the ball.

My judgement isn't only reserved for them though. Lampard was caught wanting in midfield once again, there are games where teams know they can stifle him. I can't remember anything positive coming from him yesterday, and that is a criticism for a player who I personally think is Chelsea's best in history.

Jose Bosingwa. Where do I start with him? The question is, what does he bring to the team? He certainly doesn't bring any defensive ability, which is baffling as a right back. And he also struggles to create chances. He does have pace, which is useless without any end product.

It's as if he is a makeweight, it was a relief when the excellently haired David Luiz came on and pushed Ivanovic out to right back. This has to be the way forward, having Bosingwa on is a waste of a place in the eleven.

Before I move on to Torres, the showing by David Luiz in his short time on the pitch was fantastic. Two exceptional blocks to break down attacking play from Liverpool and a few good passes to try and invoke some attacking spirit. He looks incredibly promising and is the only positive to take away from yesterday.

Now, the big story. Torres. Currently being slated in the press for having a torrid debut. One even had the cheek to compare him to Chris Sutton.

Chris Sutton if you remember played his debut in a 4-0 win against Sunderland and missed around 5 clear cut chances. Torres missed no clear cut chances and was part of two bits of play that accounted for our only threats in the game.

He looks amazingly sharp on the ball, his passing - apart from a sliced attempt to Lampard - was quick and will play a big part in making us a much bigger attacking threat in the future.

All eyes were on him, and we got stifled. Therefore Torres is being shouldered with the blame for not being able to anything. It is confusing that the press can see it that he was a major flop. Perhaps they expected him to single handedly win the game and take on the Liverpool defence and midfield that was resolutely, and intelligently, camped in their own half for much of the game.

In summary. Poor performance, not one player or one manager to blame. Collectively disappointing, but at least now we can safely say we are out of the running for the league title. Perhaps it is better to know sooner rather than be disappointed later on.

The Champions' League can't come round any sooner, we really need some positive performances to make up for lots of disappointing ones and nothing could salve the league pains more than a decent Champions' League run.

Rant over. KTBFFH!!!

Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter and Facebook

Comments

Posted by FlyingBlues on 02/07/2011

There is a lot of talk going on about chelsea and financial fairplay in 2014.. Your thoughts on that..

Posted by abbios on 02/07/2011

i don`t think so bad day bad game but they will bunce back lucky goal liverpol ,i still think chelsea is better than they look the get it right next game keep the faith chelsea fans

Posted by Ian on 02/07/2011

I agree completely. I did my round of the papers today and couldn't believe how many laid the blame at Torres' feet; it was obvious that he was starved of service throughout.

I think that the shape of the midfield had a lot to do with it; it was too narrow, and it seemed as if Lampard, Essien, and Anelka kept tripping over each other. I don't mention Mikel because he was essentially invisible; it seemed like Terry got forward and distributed more than did Mikel. Things opened up later on with the addition of Malouda and Kalou and the reversion to the 4-3-3, although that might have just been because the team was getting desperate and was pressing more for a result.

Hopefully the Anelka who played in the midfield against Sunderland is the real one; otherwise I'm not sure that having Drogba and Torres on the field at the same time is going to work out.

Posted by Senator Dru on 02/07/2011

Decent n spot on write up, Ancelotic's inability 2 anticipate opponents tactics against us just caused d title. It's not great 2 win a title u can't defend, did u notice d camera showed Steve Clark noddin like Jose Mourihno - I think he's d £50m man of d game.

Posted by joey on 02/07/2011

wooo

Posted by Joshua T. on 02/07/2011

Hey David,

I'm a Liverpool fan from Malaysia, and I have to commend you for a very fairly written article. I would like to dispute a couple of points, though.
I do believe that the defence was the foundation on which Liverpool's win was built. Sure, we looked slightly dodgy in the air, but you have to admit that the 3 centre-backs did a good job closing down your strikers. Carra was excellent, didn't look as if he was just coming back from a long lay-off.
Also, Torres was poor. He displayed the same lack of enthusiasm which infruriated us when he was at Anfield, apart from the opening 20 minutes or so.
The question for Chelsea fans now is: surely the target is not the league title, as Ancelotti claims, but 4th spot?
Cheers!

Posted by NirupomCECH on 02/07/2011

Y every1 is after Nando? Y not ask Didi the same questions ? Y didn't we play Ramires letting Essien to hold d midfield ? What the hell was wrong with Ivanovic ? Carletto pls give us som solutions ..

Posted by glenn on 02/07/2011

I'm surprised you didn't mention that Anelka looked to be completely out of sorts playing in the advanced midfield role. That should have been where Lampard played (or plays in the future if we stick with the diamond). Essien in the back and Malouda on the left and Kalou on the right.

Posted by Tom on 02/07/2011

Good analysis. The only thing I'd like to add is that maybe it wasn't a good idea to start Torres against Liverpool considering that he has trained against their defenders for the last three years and as recently as a week ago. He was never going to surprise those guys with any of his moves. Of course when you spend 50 million on a player, then you want him to play. I don't like that Torres has pushed Malouda out of the team, and I think that your solution of playing Essien in a holding role and bringing Malouda back into the team could give the midfield more spark. If Essien's form doesn't improve it might also be worth a try to play Ramires in that position. He was really starting to find his stride when he was deputizing for Mikel. I agree Luiz was great. I'd like to see him start at Fulham.

Posted by Brent on 02/07/2011

Yeah, pretty much.

I don't think Torres should have started, at least not with Anelka also starting. I noticed Ramires wasn't on the bench. Lampard should have been in the hole that Anelka was and Malouda in the midfield. Ancelotti certainly stumped me with this one.

As for Liverpool, they certainly out performed us, but there was more than a hint of negativity in their formation. They lined up for a draw and got one on the counter. Pretty embaras
sing.

Posted by Oluwafemi Samuel on 02/07/2011

comments well said. We cannot blame one man for the loss, rather its a collective loss. Torres is a good player non-the-less and I would rather a slow start with quick improvements than a 3 goal debut and goal drought.
Our mid field needs lots of performance improvement, its being our shaft right from the time of Jose. For me the holding role is very important as shown by our successes during the era of Makalele - because this position stops the opposition and turns our defence to attack. This may not always work but we can make tactical changes with all the players we have and change the pattern - 4-4-2, 3-5-2, 4-5-1 as neccessary to either come back into a game or kill the game off.
Winning or lossing is a Team thing and Torres should not be blamed for Chelseas loss. I have being a fan of Torres from the euro championship and believe he will do Chelsea proud.

Posted by Mike on 02/07/2011

I'm a Liverpool fan and I agree, Torres had no service. It was like watching him during the Hodgson era, very lonely waiting for a half decent pass for like 20 min. And you have to ask what Drogba and Anelka did with their chances by comparison.. oh wait? Man, I thought we'd rue that Maxi miss, but I'm sympathetic considering 1) he's not a striker, 2) This is not the first time he's done that 3) When the ball flies in that fast, it's hard to judge the bounce, and can fly anywhere

Posted by HG on 02/07/2011

Agree,
I didn't have much for torres. He was good on the ball.
Drogba played worse than torres. If drogba had been good would 3 man defence of liverpool able to deal with him, naah.. never. Drogba and anelka both were too much static, drogba didn't make any run to drift apart the liverpool defence..

I would have replaced drogba and mikel with malouda and ramires. Ramires is better choice at right in mid with essien holding mid area.

Ashley cole was very good but the frequency of making runs to the byline in the box must have been greater. if he gets there the chances of grabbing a goal increases heavily, at least in this tactical system.

last, we do need a player who can dribble in the box.. to unlock such a defence a player with close ball control is always needed..
TONI KROOS is the best I have got in my mind

Posted by PhantomZulu on 02/07/2011

Very interesting game, Liverpool showed our coach that he needs to come up with a new formation and strategy. David Luiz was our best player on the field yesterday, since he's here Ivanovic should go back to right back, Bosingwa needs to be sold-period. Put Essien in the holding position and Lampard should be where Anelka was yesterday. Carlo has stuck with the 4-3-3, however he keeps on using the wrong players in the right position. Ashley Cole has been very dissapointing for me this season, he looses the ball so easily and has been making a lot of silly mistakes. Kelly exposed him yesterday. Nonethless this is how I see the formation (4-3-3) moving forward. 4 (Cole[LB]-Terry[LCB]-Luiz[RCB]-Ivanovic[RB]) 3 (Malouda or Lampard[LM]-Lampard or Ramirez or McEacharan or Essien[CM]-Essien or Kalou[RM]) 3 (Anelka[LW]-Torres[CF]-Drogba[RW])

Posted by Stanley on 02/07/2011

Dont you think that Drogba as world class as he is should rather sit on the bench and play Torres with Kalou and Malouda cause Drogba needs to rest from this sickness he keeps blaming. Mikle wow bench.. Jose Bench, time for Chelsea to form our squad for 2011/12 an mould into a club for champs leauge...

Posted by Steve on 02/08/2011

Liverpool didn't line up for a draw. You know who they reminded me of??? Chelsea or Manure over the last few years. Great defending, the mid field pressing forward when attacking. Saw a different overall game than me if you think much otherwise.

Posted by paul w on 02/08/2011

Another Liverpool supporter here.
Yes, it seemed everyone expected Torres to score, but given his form recently, and his lack of support in the game, it's no surprise he didn't, though I think
he should have made a better fist of his early chance.
I think (hope) it will just take a little time for him to get back to his old ways.
Such a great player to watch when on form - but please do it against Man U, and not us!

Posted by Millsy on 02/08/2011

I'm a Liverpool fan and although I agree with what is being said in general I have a couple of points. Of course we lined up with a solid MF and back 3. We're away at the champions and facing and exceptional trio up front. We're hardly going to come out swinging and playing silly. To frame it like those are overly negative tactics is a naive. Secondly, we used the width of the park and players bombing on from deep. Kelly's and Gerrard's crosses causes havoc and even some comedy. There was nothing comical about Raul's finish though. That was clinincal. So we played to counter the opponent's strengths and exploit their weaknesses. Isn't that the way top teams are supposed to play?

Posted by ramparsad satyaveer,mauritius on 02/08/2011

i am a liverpool fan;if we all want to enjoy football as such,let's not have any grudge in any player getting transferred from 1 team to another as this is part of the business;torres gave us happy moments in liverpool shirt n we wish him a good luck with chelsea n now we back our reds,as simple as that;dalgish is doing a marvellous job,its great;

Posted by Akwasi Boakye on 02/08/2011

I seriously beg to differ about the title,all iam going to say
is that chelsea will do the treble this season,the league will be a close call but we will take it...mark my words on your wall...

Posted by OZRed on 02/08/2011

Brent, there was nothing negative in 'Pools lineup and we have nothing to be embarrassed about.....after all the hype, u guys were out-thought and out-played and we deserved the 3 points fair n square.....so grow up...!

Posted by ali on 02/08/2011

I think that night CA was doing homework wrongly, wrong choose players in wrongly position.
Better with 4-4-2, attacker was Drogba & Torres,
malouda, essien, lampard, kalou, cole, JT, ivanovic, JB
the midfielders must provided more balls to attacker and Torres was quick to do counter attack
Essien, please try the long shoot, you had power.

Keeping fighting blues!

Posted by Alex on 02/08/2011

I think your analysis misses a few major points. The first is that your manager shoe-horned Torres in to the side at the expense of too many other facts. Anelka had to play deep, Lampard had to play deeper because of Anelka. Malouda had to be left out. Liverpool had a walk in the park mainly because Chelsea were SO imbalanced trying to fit Torres in. Ancelloti was majorly at fault. the right thing would have been to play the team that was winning games, then introduce Torres as the new hero around 60 mins. Winning, losing or drawing at that point, the Torres factor would have had an impact. Subbing him at 65 mins because he looked the same disinterested lazy player LFC has seen for the last 18 months shifted the momentum to Liverpool. The manager lost you this game. Tactical naivety.

Posted by d'calcio man;inter4lyf! on 02/08/2011

i would rather blame chelsea players 4 their style of play than blaming torres or carlotte.they lack creative players,flexibility in their style of play is lacking so u cant expect the efficacy of nando to be plain.carlo should buy creative players instead of dependhng on the likes of lampard,essien ramires and the rest of them who like shots and unplanned goals.nando can't adapt to that style of play.liverpool on the other hand played collectively,they posses creative and flexible players.maxi,gerrard,lucas,paulsen:thanks to benitez for their style.drogba nando patnership cant work with this style of play.will there be chaos?in serie'a the game depends upon tacticallity,when in ac milan carlo posses creative and flexible players so why now or is he indecisive in substituting the lyks of lampard,mikel,malouda 4 creative players.chelsea style of play should change by bringing the right players.luiz and nando a good signing but it's going to be a tough one 4 both and the team.

Posted by azrul on 02/08/2011

"As for Liverpool, they certainly out performed us, but there was more than a hint of negativity in their formation. They lined up for a draw and got one on the counter. Pretty embarassing" .

come on .. you really want to go down that road? maybe you didn't notice that we are the away time .. plus, it's not as if your side under jose won every game 3-0 3-4 seasons ago .. most of the games were won only by 1-0, EVEN AT HOME!! plus, even with our 'defensive-minded' tactic, we managed to threat you more compare to your start-studded supposedly 'attacking-minded' team .. surely it's not possible, is it ? give credit where it's due

Posted by robby shabwanga on 02/08/2011

indeed chelsea lost but what about the poor refeering that we saw with two clear penalties denied against chelsea. stamfold bridge reminds of injustice of poor refeering against chelsea in that euea cup agaist barcelona.look at the manner that liverpool defender lucas conducted himself on the pitch hacking and handballs were his ordeal that day and the myopic refeere encouraged him to play on at great expense to chelsea .torres was at the receiving end his former supports pelted him with objects which were shown to him by torres and essien. football will nexver be fair play if such back refeeres continue to display such injustice.

Posted by tunero on 02/08/2011

evry one so far on this blog is right.for me,i will chiefly lay the blame on the manager. Ancelloti got it all wrong tactically. Kudos to King Kenny for coming out to get a draw but eventually wining.what chelsea desperately need is a creative midfielder in the mould of Fabregas or Luka Modric.torres shld nt be blamed at all coz the midfielders o parade at the game were abysmally poor.If we want to keep the fightin spirit of chelsea alive and hope to win somthing now and in the future,ultimately,Ancelotti has to go.He lacks charisma and he is tactically deficient.

Posted by Kola on 02/08/2011

Carlo Ancelotti used the wrong formation, 4-1-2-1-2. The game lacked creativity. Anelka had no business in the mid-field, he should have been taking off in the 2nd half and Fluorent Maluda should have replaced him.

Last but not the least, the Chelsea defense needs some soul searching, beginning with Terry and Cech, as there has been a break down in communication. John Terry needs to re-discover his physical and mental form.

Posted by Nick on 02/08/2011

Carlo seems to have his head up it over the past few weeks. No excuse for keeping Malouda out of the match in favor of Mikel. His form has slipped just a bit of late, but that is only because he was playing some serious football in the early run.

Essien would be devastating in the holding role. I always considered it his natural position and have scratched my head on this for years. He has certainly shown flexibility over this period, but the fact remains that he he is one of the more physically dominant central players in the league and has a thunderbolt from distance.

Torres appears the replacement for, rather than partner to, Drogba. The problem is, Drogba still warrants obvious selection. I mean, who could be criticized for fielding such a pair?
Torres (point), drogba and malouda just wide, lampard, ramires, essien, ivanovic, terry, luiz, cole, cech. Much better than that weak sauce against Liverpool. 19 for United just the same.

Posted by blaise on 02/08/2011

I,m a chelsea fan 4rm BURUNDI and I have 2 thngs 2 add.we were Carlo,s advetising victims.In a such crucial match he should not have lined torres and didier,the 1st half was like 9 man vs a 11 livpool men defending squad.Livpool was extremly beatable if only we had played as we did against sndland(squad)it wasn,t a test match but an optional one!we had 2 win it,but now I don,t see us conserving the throne.an advice 2 Ancelotti,Torres and Didier can,t be on the pitch same time,otherwise zealous people like ramires have 2 support,try hard carlo.
BLUE TILL DEATH!

Posted by Chew on 02/09/2011

I would suggest play Drog & Torres
Lampard Essien Malouda and Ramires
Sell Kalou and Mikel in the summer please, I grew tired of watching them for so many years, they are just not good enough

Posted by John Lyons on 02/11/2011

We lost to Liverpool because we were out gunned tactically by Steve Clarke who has a good knowledge of the game.

Teams are note going to lie down and let Chelsea walk all over them. Torres is an expensive load of crap and his poor debut only goes to show that his signing is going to be worse than Robert Fleck and Chris Sutton.

Torres take the bus back to Merseyside. I won't be burning your shirt.

Posted by diemar on 02/11/2011

The ageing Milan Side under Ancelloti had some great players, but in Chelsea..its just plain average.

Posted by Brad on 02/11/2011

I have long been an admirer of Torres and his game. The guy is world class. Over the years, I have grown to the point of pressing mute while watching football highlights. I watched the match and the loss was not Torres fault. Nor was it any one players fault. Football is a team sport as many analyst care to invision. Sure, world class players make crazy lute. But at the end of the day they still play for a Football Club. Same thing happened with L.James and D. Wade of the Miami Heat. Look what's happened since they figured it out. A total force. Chelsea FC will be fine and I see them making a serious run in the CL. Torres will be a big part of that run when it happens.

Posted by Steve on 02/12/2011

Great comments from all, (even Liverpool fans)? First of all, it is all the blame of Ancelotti, my grandmother could pick a winning team each week from the talent we have at Chelsea! Each week he is totally outcoached and clueless with his changes. We played with a decent level of skill and a lot of effort against Sunderland and won comfortably. Then we change the team and tactics for Liverpool?
Also, we add Torres who had only one week to train with the team, and match him against his former team, so that Liverpool would play twice as hard to prove that they were not concerned by this transfer? What are we thinking CA?
Essien is definately off of his game, Mikel never has a game and should be given away as an Easter gift.However,Terry Lampard and others made simple passes into disasters, do they actually practice? We need a new Manager, some passion, spirit, effort, and discipline, players who do not want to play need to move on. We need to get our house in order for next season.

Posted by Chedale42 on 02/14/2011

Sweet Kick!!!!

Posted by Patrick Low on 02/15/2011

I really have no idea what had happened to Chelsea. Ever since Ray Wilkins was sacked, the team just declined to its core!! As a Chelsea fan, it is extremely disappointing!! I just feel that there is some internal strife or dressing room problem. I do not want to blame the manager's tactics or whatsoever but having so many big names in the team is really daunting for any manager!! And what's worse is that the team's lineup or selection seems to be influenced very much by Abramovich!! Motivation is so lacking at the moment. The team is just so slow in their build up to attacks and their passing to the forwards has become so monotonous!! No wonder opposing teams are able to read their tactics so easily. I just feel that buying Torres is a mistake!! He does not create chances, he just waits for them. Haiz... Drogba and Essien are no longer the same players which I knew?? Very disappointed!!!!!!!!

Posted by John Devereux on 02/15/2011

Farewell Thanksalotti. The quicker you leave the sooner the team can start to play as a team.

Posted by tonaqdo on 02/15/2011

torres worth 50 million.and he will still play@score.

Posted by john mendy on 06/03/2011

let hope for the best next season i hope we have all it take to form a squad so come next season with the likes of torre,drogba,luiz,kalou,etc it will be better for sure

Posted by mirian on 06/09/2011

i think we need to improve on our midfield that will be better and bringing in somebody like neymar the guy from santos will change the pattern of our game.

Posted by olamilekan on 06/13/2011

i think d issue is selling kalou and play torres,drogba and anelka upfront.malouda,essien and ramires in midfield,so play mikel;as defensive midfielder and lampard as a subtitute

Posted by humza on 06/20/2011

notice just how close chelsea did get to the title...that just shows how even the guy writing the article isn't a TRUE fan...even though Chelsea were dissapointing they came back. none of you are

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Phil Lythell Phil Lythell is a Chelsea season ticket holder and lifelong Blues supporter stretching back to the sepia-tinted days of Kerry Dixon and Pat Nevin. Author of Chelsea-centric blog ShoutyandSpitty.com, Phil has spent his entire life living within a 20 minute walk of Stamford Bridge which has cost him a fortune but has also kept him from those interminable queues outside Fulham Broadway Station giving him more time in the pub to discuss the latest glorious/calamitous/insipid match.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives