ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Celtic FC
soccernet blog
Celtic FC
Posted by Andy Muirhead on 07/04/2011

Celtic are reportedly hoping to bring in Manchester City striker Craig Bellamy for a second stint at Parkhead. Bellamy played on loan at Celtic Park in 2005, winning a Scottish Cup winners medal and scoring nine goals in 15 games.

However six years on, Bellamy is not the player that he once was and Celtic should give him a wide berth, and rather focus their attentions on England international Jay Bothroyd, who despite his wage demands, would have a greater impact for Celtic than a 31-year-old striker that is injury prone.

bellamy.jpg

Both Bellamy and Boothroyd played at Cardiff City last season, however it was Bothroyd who was the better of the two on the park for the Welsh side with a goals to games ratio of 1:2.1, while the Welshman could only manage a ratio of 1:3.3.

Bellamy's ratio at Celtic back in 2005, was impressive as he scored a goal every 1.6 games. And it was that form at Celtic and previously at Newcastle that earned him a £5 million move to Blackburn Rovers in the summer of 2005, before he made moves to Liverpool (£6 million), West Ham (£7.5 million) and then a £14 million move to Manchester City in January 2009. However he has been deemed surplus by Man City manager Roberto Mancini and was farmed out on loan to Cardiff City last season.

Despite still being out of favour at City, the Eastland's club would want to recoup some of the £14 million they paid West Ham for him in 2009. But Celtic would only consider Bellamy for knockdown price of around £3 million or more favourably on a season-long loan deal. However the major issue standing in the way of Bellamy travelling up to Glasgow is the financial package on offer at Parkhead.

City currently pay the Welshman £90,000 a week and there is no way that Celtic could afford that amount of money, especially for a 31-year-old striker. The Parkhead side would also struggle to meet half of that, and Celtic could use the money they would pay out for Bellamy on several players that could bring more to the club than the Welshman, both in terms of on the park and sell on value.

That is why I believe that Celtic should ditch any bid to sign Bellamy, whether permanently or on loan, and aim their focus solely on Jay Bothroyd.

jay-bothroyd.jpg

The major advantage in going for Bothroyd is that he is out of contract, after leaving Cardiff City at the end of last season. It would save Celtic a transfer fee, and could pull their resources towards paying his wage bill which would also be significantly higher than anything Celtic currently pay their players. But he would be worth it, as he would still have a significant market value even after three years at Celtic Park.

The 29 year old striker won his first England cap in November 2010, in the 2-1 friendly defeat to France coming on as a second half substitute. Being an England international, albeit after just one game, he would command a higher wage than normal.

However Celtic face significant competition from a host of English Premier League clubs, including Everton, West Brom and newly promoted QPR. But according to Bothroyd's agent, Sky Andrew, a decision will be made in the next week or so.

Andrew said: “I think that he’ll be making a decision imminently on where he goes. For someone like him that’s out of contract he wants to get in for pre-season and get himself ready for the new season. He wants to play at the highest level.”

Celtic would only get one full season out of Bellamy, and given his wage demands and a transfer fee or loan deal, he would not be value for money and he is too close to the style of striker that Gary Hooper is. Bothroyd, however, would be a free transfer and would command less wages than Bellamy. Celtic would also get several years of service out of the Englishman and could ultimately cash in on him in two years or so for a tidy profit.

Bellamy is not the man for Celtic, it is a sentimental move bringing back a player who was at Celtic Park six years ago, and he would have no re-sale value in a couple of years. Bothroyd is where the smart money should be, both as a player and as a commodity further down the line.

Celtic MUST grab the bull by the horns and capture Bothroyd before they lose out on him, rather than focusing on someone who is not right for Celtic in Season 2011-2012.


Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter

Comments

Posted by Bent Uvaag Johansen on 07/04/2011

Totally agree! Bothroyd is type of striker Celtic need. He would be the perfect partner for Hooper. Bellamy was a hit five years ago, but is not the same player today. Personally I would have gone for my fellow countryman Huseklepp, if Celtic failed to sign Bellamy.

Posted by Sean South on 07/04/2011

Its all very well saying we MUST grab the bull by the horns, I'm sure we've made Bothroyd a very good offer but we can't MAKE him sign for us.

Bellamy is still a fantastic player and if weary Dave can play for the **** till hes 49 I think Bellamy can still do a good job for us. I'm sure Lawwell and co wont allow the club to be bled dry by Man City and would only sign the player on a deal that worked for us.

Personally speaking I'd sign the two of them and ditch Murphy, Stokes, Samaras, Juarez, Hooiveld, Cha, McGinn, Rasmussen, O'Dea and Loovens.

And in doing so have a bit left over to sign a bit of quality to replace the deadwood.

Posted by Mark on 07/04/2011

Or how about not spending £35,000+ a week on a player that has had only had 2 or 3 decent seasons in 11!

english football completely overvalues their own players-we should be looking in other countries/regions and make better use of our limited budget than expense mediocrity

Posted by Hermon pope on 07/04/2011

Get Bellamy Signed!!!

Posted by John on 07/04/2011

Craig Bellamy upsets dressing rooms so in my opinion Robbie Keane would be a better "big name" signing than Craig and I agree with Andy Muirhead that Bothroyd would be better value than Craig. However, begger's cannot be choosers and unfortunately the fact we are in the SPL reduces us to beggar status. We have to take what we can get.

Posted by mick f on 07/04/2011

i am a big fan of craig but he's not what we need now. very high wages & he'll probably spend 1/3 of the season inujred. as for the training with Cardiff you have GOT to be joking! how are the team going to gell when he's only with the other players 90 or 180 mins a week?

Posted by Tiree on 07/05/2011

Good article!

Bellamy's really good but getting on and is liable to be more injury prone; in the event of which he's no longer an asset.

Celtic have some good scouts out there. They can't find two or three young strikers with speed itching to have a go with Celtic? And, of course, make a name for themselves (and a future winfall for Celtic in transfer fees. That's the only way Celtic can hope to compete in the big league.

Posted by John Flaherty on 07/05/2011

totaly agree .if its true Bells wants to only come up for match days then remember Macari.

Posted by john on 07/06/2011

Despite the recent Bellamy rumours I can't see the Celtic board making him top priority. You can see Lennon's focus on signing top free agents in his short time in charge (Cha, Ledley, Mulgrew, Wilson, Matthews) so I can only see him pursuing Bothroyd first and turning to Bellamy later in the window on a loan attempt. That said I'm surprised the club didn't make more of an effort to sign Chris Maguire and Adam Rooney, two free agents that are proven SPL performers.

I agree with Sean, there are plenty of players on the roster we don't need and if we could see Hooiveld, Rasmussen,

Posted by steely bhoy on 07/08/2011

Agree 100% boothroyd than bellamy as he and hooper will terrorize s.p.l defenders . HAIL HAIL

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left