|
|
 |
|
How many Premier League Chairmen does it take to change a lightbulb? Apparently, it only takes fourteen out of twenty.
Phil Gartside's latest proposal to makeover the Premier League, the most popular and financially robust competition in the world at the moment, has now done the rounds, everyone has had a say, and the verdict seems to be that it's not a good idea. I'd go a bit further; Gartside's plan is dangerously stupid.
Gartside himself is not stupid. He is highly regarded by his peers and has proven himself to be quite a good figurehead for the club as they looked to establish themselves in the Premier League over the last ten years. He is an FA Board member, the shadowy twelve-man panel that chose Sven and McClaren as successive England managers, and an executive director of Wembley Stadium.
Just forget for a second that the combination of England missing the European Championships, and the subsequent loss of revenue, and the massive debt incurred in the construction of the New Wembley, has effectively shelved plans for a Clairefontaine-esque Centre of Excellence. Phil Gartside wouldn't be voted to these positions unless he was good at what he does and he cares deeply about the state of the game.
Unfortunately, his latest proposal only illustrates how completely divorced the executives at the very top of the game in this country have become from the people who pay to attend games.
It's the same idea that was put forward by Man City Megalomaniac Garry Cook, to seal off the Premier League from the brutal financial realities of the Football League, and share the gold between the teams, á la the NFL. It's the bastard sibling of Premier League Chairman Richard Scudamore's distasteful 39th Game idea. It's all about the money, and has nothing to do with the fans, which sounds like a dangerous proposition to me.
The people in charge of football clubs now are professional businessmen, and they want to run their clubs like proper businesses. And while it's nice to sell out and have a packed house, the Garry Cooks and Phil Garside’s of this world are wondering how they can best cash in on the billion people in China who haven't got a replica shirt yet.
My brother is surfing in South Africa right now, and he says every Man Utd game is shown live all over the country and everybody supports Man Utd. While it's nice selling 70,000 tickets a week, David Gill knows that there's more money to be made, and it has nothing to do with the fans that go through the turnstiles at Old Trafford.
What makes Gartside's idea stupid, as well as dangerous, is that he can't possibly have thought this through to its natural conclusion. If Scudamore and Garry Cook want to sell the product, the overseas TV packages, rather than tickets, why would Bolton necessarily be involved? If Scottish clubs can be invited into the competition, why not the most popular French or German clubs? Why not Real Madrid and Barcelona? What about a token Far East team? Why not?
Gartside sees a way to guarantee Bolton don't have to suffer the indignity of relegation. Maybe he's worried that if Bolton fell behind other mid-table clubs, even if only for a couple of years, the financial gap might be too big to ever make up.
Yeah? Maybe he should be making sure that Bolton Wanderers are being run properly, not incurring bad debts and overreaching financially which has already done for some of the oldest names in English football, like Leeds, Southampton and Leicester.
No club is too big to go down. That's the way it should be. If you need proof, just look at Newcastle. Fans across the world are transfixed at the moment, staring in bemusement and horror as one of the biggest and proudest teams in the country is careening towards Premier League oblivion. Setanta have already picked up two of Newcastle's remaining four fixtures, and if there is even a sleight chance of survival on the last weekend against Aston Villa, expect that one to be shown too.
Eliminating a competitive element like promotion and relegation from the Premier League would severely impact the interest in the Premier League. Just this season, we would have missed out on the Newcastle story, the disintegration of North East football in general and the inspiring story going on at Stoke. Stoke City probably didn't feature in Gartside's Fantasy Football at the start of the season, yet with four games left, Bolton are still looking up at them. And Stoke have been selling The Britannia out every week, unlike The Reebok.
Indeed Gartside's plan would discriminate against ambitious clubs that spend money wisely and plan carefully, all to ensure the ongoing incompetence that currently exists at the top of football.
Everyone knows that the TV money is propping up the clubs at the top of English football. The only way that will change is if smart, well-run clubs can infiltrate the monopoly Gartside is trying to guard, and are able to do more with less.
Survival of the Fittest. Maybe Gartside should ensure that Bolton Wanderers are lean enough to keep up with the competition.
Comments
 |
Posted by Bones on 04/29/2009
I believe your take on this proposal is absolutely correct. This is an attempt to secure the tv money, regardless of performance on the field. Sorry dude, but let Bolton go the way of Leeds and Leicester. If they cannot compete at the highest level, they shouldn't be at the highest level. Would this even be on the table if Bolton were still qualifying for Europe? Bet not. Taking relegation and promotion out of football will "relegate" any league to the boring, staid, malaise of American sports where there is "always next year" and BIG FAT LOSERS get rewarded with high draft picks to further propogate more staid boring malaise. Do you want the EPL to be like the NFL or NBA? What's next, PLAYOFFS, WILD CARDS, REVENUE SHARING, PUBLICLY FUNDED STADIUMS, OWNERS THREATNING TO LEAVE TOWN, SALARY CAPS, VERY PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF SALARIES.....Please Please Please recognize what you've got and how cool the organization of football IS. Relegation and promotion MUST STAY!!!!! Bones
 |
Posted by Garry O'connor on 04/29/2009
This battle is the best thing about EPL. To mess with this is crazy talk. In the MLB, around August more than ¼ of the teams have no real chance. How would the EPL like to play in front of half full stadiums for more than a quarter of the fixture list like the MBL? Watching the drop is more than half the fun of following the EPL.
Human beings have a need for drama…it seems to be a driving force for all things that we embrace. Top movies of all time? All dramas…I couldn’t find a comedy in the top 125 of the IMDB list. There is millions riding on it, players and fans life’s seemingly hang in the balance. Many companies try to create structured drama in the name of being more efficient. Contests, goals, test for promotions, ect... Promotion/Relegation is best battle for survival out there in sports. Promotion/relegation battles creative drama; drama for teams that have little else for people to care about past Christmas. It takes a bad product and gets people to care about it. God I wish I could do that with just about any other product.
Hell…I will start following ANY US league if they did Promotion/Relegation. I don’t care if it’s marbles or Clue. How good would the NBA be if the Clippers had to play the Pacers to stay in the league. Don’t think that would get at least a 15 rating? More drama equals more viewers equals more money. Simple.
I understand the need to control costs. It is getting silly. 100 mil for one player. That’s crazy and does make it very hard to complete. Put a salary cap and min in place. (I know..the EU will kill it..but try)
Keep relegation how it is…..or risk letting the magic out of the bottle.
Sorry I rambled.
 |
Posted by David Mandl on 04/29/2009
Garry O'Connor:
Promotion/Relegation in the US gets brought up frequently in the MLS discussions on espn.com. It's folly to pursue it.
US/Canadian leagues are all run by the franchises, and the clubs are never independent of the league, unlike every soccer/football team in Europe. The 32 NFL teams all have a considerable stake in the NFL, and likewise with every other sports league north of the Rio Grande river. In order for, say, the NHL to endorse pro/rel, the 30 NHL owners would have to sign off on it, knowing full well that it could cost them boatloads of money in the future. Very few responsible owners would volunteer for this.
Using hockey as an example: short of Hockey Canada and Hockey USA dissolving the NHL, AHL, ECHL, IHL, etc. and running ALL hockey leagues, FA-style, you will NEVER see promotion and relegation in that sport in the US and Canada. Same with the MLS and the USL leagues for soccer/football.
Does all that make any sense?
 |
Posted by Neb on 04/30/2009
Relegation and promotion are the life force of the European leagues. This is coming from a Charlton supporter that's just seen two catastrophic relegations in three years. Save Newcastle, Luton and Southampton, I can't think of a more painful decline in recent memory. But it keeps things interesting and keeps everyone honest -- you don't do your job and you're going to suffer for it.
But it'll never work in the United States for any sport. The States possesses a massive advantage in professional basketball, baseball, American football and -- I would argue -- hockey, and that's because they operate like cartels and exclude other organizations (franchises) to join. It's all about wealth protection, which in turn keeps the best players in the country.
MLS is another matter, because it lives in the shadow of the free-spending uneven NASL. We don't have a competitive advantage in football club maintenance so let's not get too big for our britches. Protect the league and it will develop.
 |
Posted by martin on 04/30/2009
the other problem that kills promotion/relegation in North America is geography. The teams are spread over a much vaster area than European leagues and the travel costs would be far too prohibitive for lower tier teams.
 |
Posted by Garry O'Connor on 04/30/2009
David: Yea. I know...the issues why it can't be bought into sports over here. (US) A guy can dream can't he?
I was hoping the NHL would fall apart enough a few years ago that something might be possible but they didn't quite get there.
A BCS league would be cool too...but again...a pipe dream.
I thought that all MLS teams were owned by the league? That's how that have been able to "bend" the rules for a few key signings. They need to get to about 20 teams before they can look at something like that. Of course buying the NASL outright and making two tiered league is possible but as Neb pointed out that the growth for the MLS/NASL is the key currently.
 |
Posted by John Holland on 04/30/2009
I would agree with the column but something must be done to add a bit of parity within the league. I don't want the next 10 years watching the same 4 teams battle it out. The Premier League has only 4 champions ever. There needs to be a balance of power.
 |
Posted by dave kingsworthy on 04/30/2009
Neb: The most painful decline in recent years is Leeds, hands down.
martin: "lower-tier" teams already travel across the US and beyond for USL matches...travel is not an impediment to promotion/relegation in the US.
 |
Posted by Kevin McMahon on 04/30/2009
Agree that Leeds' decline is the most painful of recent times. Newcastle will be the next one - they've been going downhill since 2001.
But this is the beauty of promotion/relegation. Leeds fans live in hope that one day they'll be back at the top table. Every team who has ever been in the Premier League has the same dream - don't kill it!
 |
Posted by gokes_in_zar on 05/01/2009
Spot on! Its just a feeble attempt to ensure the mediocre teams stay in the EPL regardless of how poor they are. Bolton have done ok but you can't really see them competing for major honours on a regular basis. More likely the 40 point objective season after season. To suggest the inclusion of Celtic & Rangers in the EPL is ridiculous to say the least. It would kill Scottish Football. Also, although nowhere a competitive as the EPL the SPL in my opinion has the BEST derby in the world. There is nothing quite like Rangers and Celtic squaring up. I for one would never want that lost even though I don't support either team.
 |
Posted by redrussky on 05/01/2009
Time to kill footies sacred cows. Cricket was the bastion of sporting conservatism seems light years ahead.This drivelling snivelling blog which yearns for a return to so-called grassroots is idiotic. Footie is finally being run as a professional business and not before time. Revenue growth and profits will determine whether yer local side still exists in ten years,or else go and watch them in your local park. Gartside's proposal is not mad at all. It should kick-start the real debate about killing off dead meat (the parochial and short-sighted FA's)and think about the long-term health of the British game. Lets have a proper national league for once and sort it on the pitch. Swansea/ Cardiff want out of the FAW, the Old Firm have sniffed enviously for years and yes Glentoran may want in.
Tradition's all well if you keep it -in the past. Want modern facilities, stadia, academies, live match technology and a globally competitive British game,as opposed to clubs,then vote for change
 |
Posted by Kevin McMahon on 05/01/2009
redrussky - ae you nuts? a proper national league means the current premier league, + Celtic and Rangers, minus the bottom 4 teams this yr (WBA, Geordies, Hull, Boro). Swansea and Cardiff are 2nd tier, no more - and btw I think they're already in the Championship.
oh wait a minute - I forgot about Glentoran. Let's move Tottenham or Man City out to the Championship to allow Glentoran in. Linfield and Crusaders as well eh? That would make it a true national league. I can just see Fergie and Wenger quaking at the thought of Glentoran.
Better check with the Isle Of Man also - I hear they have a good women's club team...
 |
Posted by Cape Town on 05/02/2009
As a South african I should point out that it's not just manu games shown live here, we get all the big games in the premier league live on satellite tv. if it's on SKY in the UK, it's on here on satellite.
And trust me, not everyone supports manu. They are probably the best supported English club in SA, but there are many supporters of liverpool and arsenal.
 |
Posted by AV on 05/02/2009
I think it would be pretty entertaining to watch Celtic and Rangers in the EPL, BUT, I feel it will only remain a fantasy. I think the biggest argument against it would be the sheer distance as highlighted by Portsmouth. I think rel/prom. is probably one of the best aspects of the league and it ensures a steady source of competition. Imagine if all the teams except the ones fighting for the title were in an Arsenal-esque position, unaffected by the last 5 games in the season, that would suck.
I hope the EPL never goes the way of the NFL with the AFC/NFC playoff system where certain teams don't play each other for years unless they meet in the playoffs and certain teams play every year in the playoffs (the Colts-Chargers come to my mind). The NFL is in a completely different ball park, if you will, than the EPL and while it would be awesome to see Celtic and Rangers compete against other teams, I feel the CL would provide the same, except the greed for money has made it into a sham
 |
Posted by Berfie on 05/03/2009
Rangers and Celtic joining? They have been eyeing on the sacred cow and crowd. With more world-wide publicity, they will hope to enhance their clubs' name. Yet, agree with that relegation/promotion is exciting, especially you have last day of the last kick to seal your team's fate. THAT should stay. Keeping it seperate is better, how else will it be better for the other nation's leagues then? Will it be better for them or not? If they were to join, then their supporters will likely just move on and may leave the remaining leagues' attendances lower, while will become a spiral down trend.
Seal it off, you'll see short-term gain (akin to having the most fancy designer's house or apparels, but no one's going to see it except you), but long term, your supporters will be left wanting more new teams up at the top tier, allowing the dream of lower leagues' team to, one day, play againsts the best in the league, trying to pull a shocker on them (like what Hull and Stoke had done this season)
 |
Posted by Paul on 05/04/2009
for those that comment on distance being a hindrance to SPL teams joining the EPL. if the Rugby S14 can have teams from SA, NZ and Aus playing each other every weekend then the logistics of traveling from Glasgow to Portsmouth seem a bit easier. Even the Australian A-League has a team in Perth and a team in Wellington, NZ. Look at a world map and check out that gap. the UEFA CL has huge gaps for travelling teams, but they only play a handful of times over the season.
 |
Posted by Pat Brady on 11/06/2009
It's fine to judge Gartside's comments as ludicrous at the moment, but what when-inevitably-the top 4 or 5 clubs within the premier league decide that the lure of the G18/19/20 (or however many it is now) and a European Superleague proves financially irresistible???
Football is cash-driven, and with United and liverpool both facing "uncertain" financial futures, a league proposal which has the prospect of regular meetings with the rest of the European elite in its criteria, far outweighs the romantic notions of regular exchanges with Hull & Wigan (absolutely no disrespect intended).
I'm sure that when Phil Gartside was drafting this proposal, he had one eye on this eventuality--hence the invitation to Celtic & Rangers....
 |
Posted by Antoine on 06/30/2010
Bonjour,
Je suis Antoine Rezvani et je propose des sites internet areswebstudio pas cher grace a la sous traitance offshore.
N'hesitez pas a me contacter : ares web studio
A bientot
Antoine
Posted by Phydayassulky on 07/15/2011
Someone essentially lend a hand to make critically posts I would state. That is the very first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I surprised with the analysis you made to make this actual publish amazing. Magnificent process!
Wonderful web site. Plenty of useful info here. I am sending it to several buddies ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks on your sweat!
hello!,I really like your writing very a lot! proportion we be in contact extra approximately your article on AOL? I need a specialist on this house to unravel my problem. May be that is you! Having a look ahead to peer you.
| |
Post your comment |
 |
|
|
|
|
Categories
Recent Posts
Archives
|