Monday night's victory over Blackburn was not, ultimately, required to secure another season of Premier League football, but it added some gloss to a wonderful finale. Survival achieved, and in some style; six wins in their last eight league games. Liverpool, Arsenal, Manchester United and Newcastle all beaten.
You can guess where I'm going with this. Villa also staved off relegation this weekend, but there can't have been such joy shared among the supporters. In contrast to Wigan, we've scratched our way desperately over the finish line. It's been two months since our last Premier League victory, that late late win over Fulham, and heading into the final match of the campaign, we're still stuck on seven league successes.
Seven. Wigan are on ten. So are QPR. Actually, so are Bolton. Blackburn have won eight. Of course, Blackburn are down, and either QPR and Bolton will drop too, but my point is this: Villa, besides Wolves, have arguably played the least productive football throughout the season. If there were two or three games to go rather than just a single one, I believe we'd be relegated.
As it was, Sunday's combination of results saw us safe - if not strictly mathematically, then realistically, for Bolton would need to win their last game by a cricket score while also needing us to lose at Norwich. But being safe with a game to go owes more to Bolton carelessly throwing away a 2-0 lead at home to West Brom than anything Villa did.
Drawing at home to Spurs: on the face of it, a reasonable result. Unless, of course, you look further than the final score. Unless you consider the balance of play during the 90 minutes, the manner in which Villa failed - yet again - to attempt to even control the game.
Consider the match facts, taken from the Guardian's report. Shots on target for Villa: one. That's right - that would have been Ciaran Clark's goal, deflected as it was off William Gallas; at least there was one Villa player willing to have a go at goal.
Possession? A paltry 38%. At home! It's pretty rare to see a team's collective possession around the 45% mark, let alone fall under 40%, but 38%? That's pitiful. And there's more: attempts on goal - Villa four, Spurs 22. Corners: Villa four, Spurs 19.
Boiled down to more simplistic terms, Villa scored first, and then settled back into retreat mode to try and see the game out. From the 35th minute onwards. Against ten men from the 50th minute. Limited ambition in the extreme, especially considering that the players should have been well aware (if instructions were being passed on from the touchline) that Bolton were beating West Brom until the closing minutes, and that a single point wouldn't have been enough.
Had - and I'm well aware it's all immaterial now - Bolton held on for another few seconds, they'd sit a point behind Villa going into the final match of the season. That Villa lacked the encouragement, the direction, the nous, the instruction, to play any other way than in backs-to-the-wall defensive mode with so much at stake, is both baffling and deeply disturbing.
Hence the lack of satisfaction, and the deepening of disquiet. A job well done? No.
A job half done - the other half has yet to completed. As soon as the final whistle blows at Carrow Road on Sunday, signalling a welcome end to this most desperate, disillusional of seasons, the focus will be firmly on the future of the manager, Alex McLeish.
As it should. McLeish's position must surely be untenable; he's amazingly managed to succeed in underperforming during a season which always carried very low expectations. I've read articles in the past couple of weeks warning that Villa risk falling into mediocrity, should McLeish stay on. Mediocrity? We should wish. That suggests Villa face a future of simply being average. As it stands right now, we're falling short of that standard.
The last two months have revealed much about McLeish. Put under the microscope, he has shrivelled. His body language has been appalling, akin to shrugging his shoulders in a 'nothing to do with me' gesture; he's been utterly helpless as Villa's form went into freefall (this will ring bells with Birmingham fans, recalling the final few weeks of their 2010-11 relegation season - Blues, of course, went down on 39 points; Villa with a game to go, have 38).
Not only that, in the last couple of games, he's even been difficult to detect during games, deploying a tactic of staying in the dugout, for fear of antagonising supporters. Surely, Villa cannot persist with him in charge? And yet, there remains the concern that, weary of yet another managerial interview process, the Villa board may stick with him.
The outcome isn't certain, in my opinion. McLeish has, of late, been talking about his plans for the new season, seemingly oblivious to the fact that he's just presided over Villa's worst ever league campaign. He appears especially deluded, recently seemingly suggesting he's actually done a good job because Sir Alex Ferguson (his former manager at Aberdeen, remember, and the man whose glowing reference did much to convince Villa owner Randy Lerner to hire him in the first place) apparently reassured him that there are clubs with stronger squads below Villa in the Premier League table.
For that assertion alone, McLeish deserves to have dismissed immediately. For the sake of Villa's supporters, the future direction of the club, 2012-13 season ticket sales and just about everything else, let's hope the board make the correct decision, and make it quickly.