ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Aston Villa
soccernet blog
Aston Villa
Posted by Kevin Hughes on 10/28/2011

With his previous employment history, Steve Bruce is never going to earn a warm place in the hearts of Aston Villa fans.

This was the man, remember (actually, who could ever and will ever, forget?) who scored an infamous 97th-minute winner for Manchester United at Sheffield Wednesday, a goal which more or less ended the title hopes of Ron Atkinson's Villa the best part of two decades ago.

And a man who, during his time as boss of Birmingham City, presided over a sequence of six unbeaten derby matches, winning four and drawing two: unbeaten in games against Villa for three seasons running.

So, it is particularly galling that Bruce considers Villa to be one of his 'lucky' teams, in terms of his record against us. And all the more galling that Bruce is exactly right. A trip to Sunderland on Saturday, then, is not exactly the perfect fixture for a Villa side looking to banish a West Bromwich Albion-fulled hangover.

Sunderland beat Villa twice last season, home and away, in two of the most infuriating games of the entire campaign. At the Stadium of Light, Villa looked in no danger whatsoever until Richard Dunne - befitting his ignominious role as the leading own-goal scorer in Premier League history - inexplicably volleyed into his own net, under pressure from exactly no-one.

In the return fixture, Villa were again comfortable enough until Emile Heskey was sent off for indulging in a bit of shoving. Phil Bardsley, demonstrating far more ability than he ever showed during a six-month loan spell at Villa back in 2007, scored the only goal of the game with a fantastic long-distance strike.

Looking back, that Sunderland defeat at home was probably the lowest point of the campaign. Just a few days later, the season took a turn for the better; Villa signed Darren Bent, from Sunderland.

Bruce had plenty to say about that at the time, literally frothing with righteous indignation at losing his top scorer and conveniently overlooking two things. One: Bruce himself has never been afraid to switch employees for the sake of his career (leaving Wigan for Sunderland the first example), which is only what Bent was doing. Two: Villa made an offer for Bent, and a generous one at that - and Sunderland accepted. Very quickly too. The option to reject it was always there.

Sunderland fans were obviously disappointed. More than that; outraged. I had a certain amount of sympathy with them at the time, having seen Villa lose top players in Gareth Barry and James Milner in recent years. And, since the Bent transfer, seen two more - Ashley Young and Stewart Downing - quit Villa for 'bigger' clubs. It's painful and it feels like a betrayal, and I understand that.

What Sunderland fans couldn't get their heads around was that Bent was effectively swapping a shot at European football - as I recall, Sunderland were 7th in the Premier League when Bent left - for a relegation battle, which is definitely what Villa were being sucked into. Even though Bent insisted his decision was down to football reasons, fans of his former club remained disbelieving of his reasons.

Come the end of the season, Villa were in 9th place and Sunderland, having recovered well from a real late slump in form, a place and a point behind. Much of Villa's revival was put down to Bent, and the eight league goals he contributed.

The player himself also cemented his place in England's starting line-up, and he's retained that throughout the Euro 2012 qualifiers. Considering his emergence at international level, and Wayne Rooney's suspension, it's highly likely Bent will lead England's attack at next summer's tournament.

Move to Villa for footballing reasons? Judging on what's happened to Bent over the last nine months, it doesn't now seem such an outlandish claim.

Anyway, back to Saturday's game. It's certainly going to be a tense affair for Bent, and for Villa. Despite complimentary remarks on his time at Sunderland from the player, and a generous acknowledgment of his 18-month contribution to the cause from his former manager, the Villa striker knows he's in for a difficult 90 minutes.

As are Villa. The 'difficult to beat' tag has vanished in recent weeks but it may be that this away trip will suit Alex McLeish and his team. First priority will be to keep things tight and stay competitive, and McLeish is good at getting that from a team; if he selects the right personnel, particularly in midfield.

If Villa can get that right, Bruce's lucky run may just come to an end.


Follow ESPNsoccernetFC on Twitter

Comments

Posted by bill on 10/29/2011

This team isn't going anywhere. I know no one wants to hear this, but since MON left, this team has gone from a true European contender to a team that may finish 8th with some luck.
The MF play is lacking. Petrov is able to create offensively, but he has trouble getting back on defense in his new role. Ireland should NEVER play. Albrighton is somewhat out of favor with AM, which is sad because he played his heart out last year.
Heskey is what he is at this point, but he shouldn't be playing most of your games. At least Gabby has been better.
The team has improved defensively, but this team is the worst Villa team I have ever seen on set pieces. Opposing teams get about 50 % free headers. The second Sunderland goal was atrocious defending.
AM has improved the defense, especially the back four. But the lack of MF creativity needed to counter with his style of play is lacking. Just hope we don't turn into a squad that draws half the time...like Birmingham. Means we are in deep trouble.

Posted by Alan on 10/30/2011

Great blog once again from a thoughtful and articulate Kevin. I have to agree 100% with his appraisal of the situation at Villa park - I cannot, however, be as rational about the team's current level of performance. It all seems rather more simple to me - you simply cannot sell off four talented international players ( Barry, Milner, Young and Downing ) and expect to compete as well as you did, even against the so-called " ordinary " teams.

I do note that these four were all top class midfield /wide players who not only made huge contributions to the quality of play and also to the "goals for" column. I also note that this is an aspect of the present team's game which AM just cannot get right.

The team itself has not, as many might think, been strengthened by the purchase of Bent, who has a pretty suspect chance to goal ratio or the Zog, who seems completely out of his depth at the moment.

Bad feelings - growing worse.

Posted by gene seymour on 10/31/2011

We already in deep trouble. Would be in bottom three before Xmas. Our style of play is too predictable, once we conceded a corner, opposing team knew they can get some thing out of it. We are just not good enough to be in the Premier League.
The owner doesn't give a shit, the only thing that interests him is the $$$ in his bank account.
He has no more good players to sell next season, he would sell the club in 2012.

Posted by Alan on 10/31/2011

Not too sure, Gene...deep trouble would be if we cannot pick up any points against the top teams in the run up to Xmas...hmmm - you could be right. As to your comment about the owner not giving a s..t - perhaps you're right or maybe he doesn't actually recognise s..t when he sees it. Well, he wouldn't would he?

Let's have a little look around for the new window... anybody take your fancy? Missed out on Owen ( maybe not too late ) Vidic seems a little out of favour... even so, any quality players will cost a great deal of bucks - so no obvious deal then as long as this bloke is in charge

PS - have you seen the attendance figures for the park this season?

Even more concerned now...

Posted by Zarch on 11/01/2011

I think the simple truth is we need some real investment. Was great buying Bent but that's all we bought. What good is a top class striker without a sufficient midfield?
I hope it's a case of RL just wanting to build some capital to get back in the mix. Otherwise I would be screaming for him to sell. As much i like the guy and what he's done for the club, I definitely want an owner willing to invest.

Posted by M sterling on 11/01/2011

I agree with most here - the quality of build up play is predictable and it seems AM is turning us into Birmingham - the draw specialist. After the goal from Dunne I knew that a equalizer was coming even with only 5 min left; why?
Simple, we started defending deep and lost possession instead of going forward and attacking - the mistake of a lot of teams in PL. In fairness, many teams start to defend late in the game with leads but in PL ANY team can beat you if no pressure is applied and corners are constantly earned.

Posted by geneseymour on 11/06/2011

It's good to see Bent and Gabby on score sheet, a good win and gives us a timely relief. But in the long run Villa are not going anywhere. What the owner did was kept depleting the squad, he sold Barry, he also sold Milner, Young, Downing...and whoever does well this season will be sold next season. That's what the owner did for the past few years. Unless there is a new ownership, I don't see Villa progressing in the future.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Kevin Hughes Kevin Hughes spent the best part of ten years working and writing for the football magazine Match; once (sort of) inspiring David Beckham to copy his shaved-hair look, getting lost in Paris after the 1998 France v Croatia World Cup semi-final and other such nonsense. As Deputy Editor, he launched and established Sport, the London-based free weekly magazine, before moving on to become a consumer magazine publisher, a position he holds today. Introduced to Villa by his father and grandfather, he attended his first ever match at Villa Park as a seven-year-old in 1982… and has suffered almost constant disappointment since. You can follow him on twitter @KevHughesie

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives