ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Aston Villa
soccernet blog
Aston Villa
Posted by Jerrad Peters on 06/15/2011

Aston Villa staff arrived at Bodymoor Heath to see graffiti sprayed on the red brick entrance of the club’s training ground on Wednesday morning. Meanwhile, club owner Randy Lerner was reportedly in London, meeting with prospective new manager Alex McLeish – the former Birmingham City boss who had resigned his St. Andrew’s post just three days earlier.

By lunchtime, the white painted words “Bluenose scum not welcome” and “SOTC” had been scrubbed away, but in their place arrived a much more formidable form of protest – a Facebook page entitled, “Aston Villa Supporters – We don’t want Alex McLeish,” which by five o’clock in the afternoon had attracted 15,600 members.

By six o’clock (just before this column went live), Villa fans had already begun to mobilize at Villa Park for a protest endorsed by the Facebook page administrator Kevin Powell, who in a letter to Lerner wrote, “You may be the club’s owner but this appointment would alienate the real heart of the club – us, the supporters.”

He continued, “Without the supporters a football club is nothing. We have come to the conclusion that if we do not have an official statement from the club about the situation by 6pm on Tuesday the 14th, we will be staging a protest at Villa Park the following day at 6pm.”

A statement was, indeed, released by the club shortly thereafter, although its content only spurred more Villa fans to take up the anti-McLeish cause.

“The Club understands that Alex McLeish is a free agent,” it read. “We therefore intend to interview him imminently in order to make a decision regarding his candidacy to become Villa manager… We are determined, still, not to allow that three-and-a-half year post [at Birmingham City] to disqualify him should he be the best candidate for the role of Aston Villa manager.”

Then, as if more gasoline needed to be thrown on the fire, Villa director Charles Krulak remarked that the uproar over McLeish was “uncalled for,” adding, “He has proved he can manage in the big leagues – just imagine what he could do if he was with an owner who supported him.”

Problem is, that owner – Lerner – is simply so disconnected from his club’s support base, and perhaps from the sport of football in general, that he had no idea the storm he’d stir by effectively giving the finger to the fans and interviewing the just-departed boss of their archrivals.

Lerner, don’t forget, comes from a National Football League culture where hiring a rival’s head coach isn’t even blinked at, where a travelling fan culture doesn’t exist and where rivalries are more the sofa/gambling variety than the type he should have come to know in his five years at the helm of an English football club.

None of this is to say he hasn’t invested in the squad – something his few remaining advocates are quick to point out. But the fact is that over the past ten months – from the foolish hiring of Gerard Houllier and all the nonsense and infighting it produced to the parade of potential managers who hung up the phone as soon as Lerner called – Aston Villa have become something of an organizational laughingstock.

Roberto Martinez’ rejection of Lerner’s advances is case in point. A bright, young, up-and-coming manager, Martinez chose to remain at Wigan rather than join a historically bigger, more fashionable club because, quite frankly, the situation at DW Stadium under Dave Whelan is far more stable than that at Villa Park under Lerner.

All in all, you get the feeling that Villa are currently a club that lacks a sense of itself – a phenomenon that can be traced directly to its leadership, and ultimately Lerner.

When the owner of a football club is brazenly thumbing his nose at the folks he hopes will fill the stands in two months time, one of two things need to happen. Either the fans bring him back to his senses and show him the way, or they show him the door.

http://twitter.com/peterssoccer


Follow ESPNsoccernet's Football Correspondents on Twitter

Comments

Posted by Karl Smith on 06/15/2011

This article is a complete joke and based nothing more on myths invented by the media.

Please tell me when Martinez was the offered manager's position at Aston Villa? The decision was made due to the emotional relationship with Wigan and Whelan, not on Aston Villa's prospects.

Lerner has done a lot of great things for Aston Villa and will continue to do so in the long term.

All I see here is more bitter journalism and no creditability.

Posted by Steve Paqrkes on 06/15/2011

The article holds truth, although Lerner has invested well the past few years, he should listen to the fans voice, after all, it's their club.

Posted by Tony on 06/15/2011

we have been made to look a shambles over the last few weeks, in lerners defence he's made considerable investment into the club, but what is really worrying is that there seems to be a complete lack of leadership at the club at the moment, alex mcleish's appointment seems to fly in the face of common sense and all the while our best players are looking elsewhere, i've been a villa fan for over 30 years but this is one of the strangest times i've seen at the club

Posted by Will Bourke on 06/15/2011

Spot on! I couldn't agree more with the article, all but the Martinez part, we did only ask to interview him so one could argue the point that he didn't infact turn us down, more like he turned down the opportunity to interview for the job.
Nobody could argue that Randy's heart is not in the right place or that he is not determined to make good on his ongoing investment in Villa. This is not in question, what must be questioned is his ability to make good on his promises to the villa fans. I now feel that Mr. Lerner is exactly that Mr. learner.
Most of us recieved our early football learning from Match, Shoot or Four Four Two. Randy is learning all about football and its many pitfalls through his toy investment. This is all well and good for a Billionaire, but I am not a rich man.
The money I spend is the result of my hard work. I wont be spending any more to subsidize Mr. Lerner's fantasy football team.

Posted by Bongo on 06/16/2011

I, for one, think this is spot on. Lerner may have the cash, but he obviously doesn't have the know how to run a major (which is what Villa should be) club in a major league. As much as I disagree with MON over his walk out on Villa, he did it because of the lack of funds needed to keep us at the pointy end of the table. Then we had GH, who got the funds to buy some good players, but many thought his poor health was going to be a problem (which it turned out to be). Also, he alienated some of our better performers over the past few years, and now they've moved on. Now, it looks like we are going to not bother asking the likes of Hughes, Benitez or Ancelotti to take over, but offer the job to guys who've managed strugglers, in Martinez and now a guy who failed to keep his last team (and our most bitter rivals) in the EPL. I am flabbergasted.

Posted by Bill on 06/16/2011

KARL SMITH....the BCC reported days ago that Martinez DID turn down Villa. JP is not reporting myths.
Lerner has done "great" things for Villa. Allowed MON a TOTAL of 84 Mill NET over 4 yrs to improve Villa from a near relegation club to a European team. That isn't a great deal compared to Spurs, Liverpool etc. , yet alone the Bigger Boys.He handles the club like a confused executive when it comes to making decisions. I am not a big Barry fan, but why would he or Milner stay when he saw what the finances were like at Villa? Yes, Villa spends, but the amount is never enough to push them into the Top 4.AY sees this.

Look at the history of the Browns since he took control. Chaotic changes with head coaches over a decade.Villa was lucky MON put up with his ownership ineptitude. GH appointment was a farce. He was so out of touch with the EPL, we were lucky to have survived the drop.
I get the McLeish furor, but he may be the best out there. A few early wins will quell the irate fans.

Posted by Brad on 06/16/2011

The biggest thing about this whole situation is this. If AVRC is to be considered one of the bigger clubs in England, then it needs a manager that is one of the biggest in England. There is a reason why players are not staying. It might be the money, but the club has lacked ambition at manager, not splashing out money for a proven winner and then keep that winning attitide by bringing in players who will win as well. It is almost to a point where I would like to reliquish my fandom of AVFC if stupidity reigns.

Posted by Mac on 06/16/2011

Agree with a lot of the sentiment above. Lerner is an astute businessman, but not necessarily a successful one with it comes to owning a sport franchise. The Browns have been a laughingstock during his ownership and only recently have shown signs of life. It's night and day when comparing the NFL to the EPL. You must spend to win in the latter

Yes, he has spent, but not like a billionaire. He spends more like a millionaire if that makes any sense. I didn't really trust MON and his transfer abilities, but regardless he never was given a war chest of sums in which to compete with the big boys. In this day and age you can speak of ambition, but you have to spend. Villa needed to spend just to stand still last offseason and they sold. That Milner cash was not reinvested staight away, which was needed IMO. Will the AY cash? Or will that be used to again lower the wage bill? Supporters will expect RL to truly follow through on his ambitious ways and spend, spend, spend.

Posted by Don on 06/16/2011

Maybe the Villa fans can show up in green and gold kit, much good it's done ManUtd fans. I think McLeish is a great choice. With Bent in place for a whole season and the kind of player Alex can attract, Villa look a solid 6th next year if they can keep Ashley Young.

Posted by Des on 06/16/2011

As much as it hurts to see a loser taking over as manager of the club I have supported for over 65 years,it is now imperative that a manager is put in place immediately.
How he will fare with the motley crew of players we currently have only time will tell.
Whoever is put in charge is going to have to buy replacements and it is going to have to done with urgency.

Posted by Gordon on 06/17/2011

I am not a Villa fan but Villa fans should note that Lerner has come under much criticism here in the US from NFL fans who feel like the Cleveland
Browns team has been ignored due to Lerner's
involvement with Villa. Unlike Liverpool 's
former American owners, Lenrer is committed heart
and soul to Aston Villa, it is not just about the
green.

Posted by BCFC on 06/17/2011

Its Good Ridance to a bad manager. You are welcome to him!

Posted by john mclauchlin on 06/17/2011

It seems to me that the McLeish appointment was an exasperated one. Lerner looks to have got fed-up with the 2 month search for a manager and was just unwilling to invest more time into the hiring process.

And the same goes with him investing more money into the club. He's content with Villa being a mid-table Premier League team for the next few years and the way he sees it McLeish will be able to achieve that and won't constantly press him for funds.

The level of investment needed to break into the top has only gotten higher and even established top 4 clubs are having to spend just to keep hold of their positions. It's not just players. Villa (to my knowledge) don't have an established scouting network nor do they have a Director of football who can layout a long-term growth strategy.

Lerner doesn't appear to fancy doing that.

Posted by Don Cotwo on 06/17/2011

In the US it is not unusual to hire a rival manager, baseball does it all the time. Football and basketball also. So, Lerner is working from his knowledge base. But, he was willing to buy Bent and that worked. He is committed to Villa and that is good. McLeish has an excellent pedigree and club size wise, Villa and Rangers aren't that much different. Birmingham were lucky to have had McLeish. His pedigree includes several seasons with SAF. You can't discount that. Blue or not, he is now a Villein.

Posted by medfest on 06/19/2011

Wow a lot of misinformation here.
Randy Lerner is not an astute businessman,he inherited his money from his father Al who was a business genius.
Being a native Clevelander he is well aware of how hard core the rivalries between the Cleveland Browns and Pittsburgh Steelers and Cincinnati Bengals are and these both involve lots of traveling supporters just as rabid as those in England.

He is a retiring owner who prefers to stay in the background by hiring people to be his "football people",he does that in Cleveland (Mike Holmgren)as well as in Birmingham.He doesn't seek or want the spotlight on him.

He doesn't have a great track record hiring coaches and GMs here in Cleveland so far,but he does run a first class organization that at least tries to do it the right way.I'm sure Villa is run the same way.If fans really hate the choice of Mcleish for his lack of ability then fine,but if he's being pilloried for coming over from a demoted arch rival ,well that's just foolish.

Posted by AndyE on 06/19/2011

Maybe Martinez chose to stay with Wigan because of the Villa fans?

Posted by sterling on 06/20/2011

Martinez stayed loyal to Wigan because of the owner which gave him his first PL job-- thats all. He turned down the interview not the job he was never offerred. There are lots of managers that turn down jobs - big deal. Villa fans grow up-- they needed a quality manager to start the season and get some players in and get the ones out that don't want to be here -- GH hire was a desperate hiring and mistake no doubt. Glad he is gone. Be happy Lerner loves Villa and is a good owner. AMc will bring in good players starting with Gardner- who should have never been sold -- thanks MON for that... its easy as a fan to critize your club because it makes you feel important but your money is on not the line like the owners.. show up and support Villa and give the new manager a chance.

Posted by BILL on 06/20/2011

Guys, AMc is a very good choice. Yes, Blues were relegated.Look at their roster....won the Carling with a subpar squad. Villa has more to offer. He has a pedigree with Rangers.
Bottom line, Villa didn't get Martinez. shame, because he is an up and comer. But AMc isn't fodder. Good manager who demands discipline. Sure Villa's back four won't be comical like GH reign.


Villa is a better club today than with GH. Young will be gone, but anyone watching Villa last 2 years knows he didn't play near his 08-09 level. He may become a superstar at ManU. But Villa can replace him. 40 mill..as rumored..is a nice war chest for AMc to get Villa back to Europe.

I am satisfied with this hire...I sure wasn't with GH.

Posted by RitchieD on 06/22/2011

I dont always agree with JP, but this article was accurate. Its been nearly a week since it became clear that Big Eck was going to be appointed, and in that time my anger has subsided....or at least been redirected !

Paul Faulkner is responsible for the day to day running of the club, and i think the confusing statements and near nedless list of name who were apprently courted makes him, and thus Villa, look silly.

As J Mc posted, we've got no director of Football or similar to ensure that a long term strategy is followed.....i know that position is derided here, but a DoF would have ensured that Houlliers departure had a lesser effect on the club, and that any replacement would have been appointed faster.

Im also really worried that Mr Faulkner seems to have a "vision" for the club, but i cant see what that must be when they hopped from one candidate to another, all of whom had different playing styles etc.....all very concerning.

Posted by Dan on 06/22/2011

While I'm not happy about AMc being hired as our coach, it does open the door for pulling players from BHam that Villa desperately needs, such as Gardner, Foster, R. Johnson, and Ridgewell. With our aging defense and midfield departures (AY and SD most likely) we need to shore up these areas. Ireland, Delph, Bannan, and C. Clark are all good young(ish) players that have shown sparks of quality. Add them to the proven likes of Albrighton and Delfounso and Villa should be ok. AMc is a no nonsense type of manager that can provide the discipline for our club. Let's call for his head only AFTER Villa languishes (hopefully not!) in the relegation zone!

Posted by John on 06/22/2011

What it comes down to is that AMc is easily the best available man for the job. After his long term success at AV he will step up to MU when SA retires. Villa is incredibly lucky to have him, and after the dust settles (which might take a year or two or even three), and AMc has had the chance to build on what is already here, Villa will be challenging inside the top 8 year after year.

What people don't seem to see is that the talent pool is leveling, and, especially with the soon to be implemented financial fair play rules, money will not buy a winner outright. It will be won on the character and will and football intelligence of the gaffer, and the strength of the organization (especially youth development).

The Premier league is leveling into a top 10, and 10th will be closer in quality to 1st, year after year after year. The big 4 is now a big 6. Soon AV, E, and N will be in the mix, and there will be a new winner, and the competition will be wide open after that.

Posted by Mac on 06/23/2011

Lots of rumors floating about as to how much of a transfer kitty Lerner has alotted McLeish. Is it 40M, 30M or is it once again a sell in order to buy policy? I've read each.

With the news now that Downing has been made available for 19M I don't see how McLeish has any real chance at succeeding. Villa is now a feeder club for the big boys. Lerner and his football ignorant cronies can talk all about ambition and how they want to move this club forward. I'm no genius, but you move forward by keeping your best players and surrounding them with similar quality. Players want to play CL football or at the very least feel that they can compete for a top four spot. AV's actions the past few years, as far as selling their best players, has shown that all their ambitious claims are simply words sputtered.

Are there any European competitions for mid-table clubs? That's the message that this board sends out....we talk a good game, but we're not willing to back it up. Absolute farce.

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
Kevin Hughes Kevin Hughes spent the best part of ten years working and writing for the football magazine Match; once (sort of) inspiring David Beckham to copy his shaved-hair look, getting lost in Paris after the 1998 France v Croatia World Cup semi-final and other such nonsense. As Deputy Editor, he launched and established Sport, the London-based free weekly magazine, before moving on to become a consumer magazine publisher, a position he holds today. Introduced to Villa by his father and grandfather, he attended his first ever match at Villa Park as a seven-year-old in 1982… and has suffered almost constant disappointment since. You can follow him on twitter @KevHughesie

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives