ESPN Soccernet - Correspondents - Arsenal
soccernet blog
Arsenal
Posted by David Young on 08/27/2009

Goals from Eduardo, Emmanuel Eboue and Andrey Arshavin helped Arsenal to a straight-forward 3-1 victory at Ashburton Grove last night and booked the team's ticket into the Champions League group stage. It was a long way from being the most accomplished performance from the Gunners that we have witnessed this season. They were not at their best - and they didn't need to be to beat a Celtic team that barely created three meaningful chances over the two legs.

The main talking point of last night's match surrounded the awarding of the penalty which led to Arsenal's first goal when Eduardo was adjudged to have been brought down by goalkeeper Artur Boruc. The Croatian got back to his feet to convert the resultant spot-kick and effectively ended the tie as a contest with Celtic players still remonstrating with the referee long after the ball had hit the back of the net. Viewing the incident in real time at the stadium, it did not look a clear-cut penalty and not many Arsenal fans were appealing when Eduardo went down. Replays have since shown that any contact was very minimal and the Arsenal striker had made the most of the situation.

Probably the most diplomatic thing to say is that the Gunners benefited from some generous refereeing. Eduardo is not the first player to have gone down under the faintest of touches to buy a penalty for his team nor will he be the last. Arsenal have been on the receiving end of similar decisions going the other way and, as always with football, these things tend to even themselves out. That is not to condone or excuse diving or the exaggeration challenges, but it would be entirely naïve to assume or even expect that players will always play the game in the Corinthian spirit.

With that fact of life in mind, the hysterical reaction, or rather over-reaction, to the incident by the media, the Scottish FA and UEFA today is surprising to say the least. Some of the comments that have emanated from those three bodies have gone way over the top, particularly in the light of the fact that Arsenal won the tie so easily over the two legs and, when it came down to it, the penalty decision was largely irrelevant. One might have thought that Eduardo was being accused of the most heinous offence ever perpetrated on a football pitch from the level of sanctimonious outrage and hand-wringing from certain quarters that has been expressed the day after.

There have been calls for a UEFA inquiry and a ban for Eduardo if he is found guilty. Let’s think about that for a moment. If the Croatian is found guilty of simulation and banned for one or two matches I am sure that the player and Arsenal Football Club will take the punishment on the chin and without any fuss. The question will be though: if UEFA do take that course of action will they continue to apply it consistently in future and in every instance? And if banning players for simulation retrospectively on video evidence is to become an adopted practice, will it only be for players seeking to gain penalty kicks? Or will it be for dives within a goalscoring range? Or for anywhere on the pitch? Already one can sense a can of worms opening.

The chances are that Eduardo will get banned by UEFA to appease the hysterics of the media and the SFA – even though a yellow card is the actual punishment for such an offence - and then the whole thing will most likley be forgotten until the next controversial incident. But, if UEFA do go down that route, it will set a very large precedent, particularly with regard to over-ruling their own officials.

This argument will rumble on until, well, something more interesting comes along to displace it from the back pages. All that Arsenal fans really care about is that the team have progressed to the group stage of the Champions League and this afternoon they were drawn with AZ Alkmaar, Olympiacos and Standard Liege. Hardly, three of the most glamorous teams that the Gunners could have been drawn with but, in avoiding the likes of Real Madrid, Juventus and Internationale, it is group that they ought to be able to win and win well. That said, they cannot afford to show any complacency or lack of focus as all three teams are champions of their respective countries and will not be there just to make up the numbers.

So, with Champions League qualification taken care of, attention now turns to Saturday and the first really big game of the season when Arsene Wenger takes his team to Old Trafford to face Manchester United. I do not subscribe to the view that the great start to the season is merely attributable to poor-quality opposition. In truth, the Gunners have made their opposition look inept by getting their approach right and playing some excellent football. Despite that, there is no doubt we will have a far clearer idea after Saturday’s match as to whether this team look like real contenders this season. That is not to say they necessarily have to go up there and win - though a victory would be a tremendous signal to all of their rivals and critics. It is more about whether they show the right attitude, rise to the challenge of their stiffest examination so far this term and actually compete with United mentally as well as physically.

We all know this team can play when they want to but what will make them real winners is whether they can reproduce their best form, retain their focus and sustain a supreme level of competitiveness week after week after week, from now until May. Old Trafford would be a great place for them to start proving they have what it takes.

Comments

Posted by Maran on 08/28/2009

I would agree that the comprehensive win over Celtic has been marred by the controversy surrounding the penalty. Although as a Arsenal fan I am not complaining, but as a supporter of fairness in the game of soccer, this does not augur well for the team. We have lamented in the past of unfairness in the game, including diving by opponents. One notable incident was the Rooney dive that changed the destiny for the unbeaten Arsenal team. It is not about evening out of decisions, it is more of adopting the spirit of fairplay. I think a tough tackler breaking a leg of opponent ranks better than one who dives outright. The difference is in the intentions. Even if Eduardo had dived as a reaction, his following actions were debatable. Remember the day Fowler remonstrated he wasn't touched by Seaman when Liverpool was awarded a penalty. I prefer Arsenal to stay in moral high grounds and I hope this incident is only an aberration.

Posted by JOE on 08/28/2009

YEAH AM AN ARSENAL FAN BUT I HATE TO SWALLOW A SOUR PILL AND I MAY JUST HAVE TO SWALLOW THIS ONE.EDUARDO YOU DID THE WRONG THING.AM A FOOTBALLER MY SELF ANDI PLAY THE SAME ROLE AS YOU DO BUT I WOULDNT GO DOWN THAT EASILY.TRUST ME.NEXT TIME BE TRUS TO YOUR SELF

Posted by jk on 08/28/2009

lETS THRASH MANU TMR.hOPE FAB PASSES HIS FITNESS TEST AND WE CAN HIT 5 PAST THEM

Posted by PHILIP OBI on 08/28/2009

The comprehensive win over Celtic has nothing to do with the penalty awarded to Eduardo. Believe me. With or without the penalty, Arsenal would have won the match easily. And come to think of it, if you are an Eduardo, and having passed through what he did from Martin Taylor and come out of it, you will try your best not to get in contact with any opposing player.That is exactly what he did and the Referee was generious enough to award him the spot kick.Who wouldn't take it? Moreover, he never appealed for a penalty.Let UEFA, SFA, Celtic players and fans take the decision and move ahead. After all, we took it two seasons ago against Liverpool in the champions league and nobody did nothing. As for us, we are concentrating on our next match against united.

Posted by Oscar Macumu on 08/28/2009

Obi, I appreciate your comments but I think the penalty won by Eduardo changed the game. Not that Arsenal would not have won anyway, but it could have been harder and frustrating. Even the Celtic players admit that they may not have won but that the match could have turned out different if that penalty had not been awarded. And I think the issue is whether Eduardo should have gone down that easily. We see a lot of antics like that in the professional game of today, but it does not mean that they augur well with what our football is about. And we also have to look at the effect of a ban, if Eduardo does get a 2-match ban, and what it will mean for the team. Am glad we won though. I just wish we had won and it was looked at being fair an d square. Nice weekend people.

Posted by philip kipchirchir teigong on 08/28/2009

Belief me arsenal beat celtic clearly despite the eduardo dive. bravo to arsenal by beating celtic and silencing the critics wrong on some issues next is man utd without ronaldo is a team to beat 4-1 on saturday .prove me wrong

Posted by philip kipchirchir teigong on 08/28/2009

Belief me arsenal beat celtic clearly despite the eduardo dive. bravo to arsenal by beating celtic and silencing the critics wrong on some issues next is man utd without ronaldo is a team to beat 4-1 on saturday .prove me wrong

Posted by Fritz Alfred on 08/28/2009

Setting a precedent like this by possibly giving a two match ban for what is only a bookable offense is ludicrous.I would love to see diving out of the game but punishing a first time offender and then villifying him as though he was a serial diver(ie Drogba,Ronaldo)is just wrong. As far as the game is concerned, I believe quite strongly that if we stick to this 4-3-3 formation, which by the way Ade could not have bought into because it required constant movement and putting pressure on th opposing back four to make a precise pass. I belive all the Gunners have bought into the new formation and system and are actually playing for each other. Who would have thought that in this day and age, that you could still assemble a team full of players that believe in each other and see team glory first before individual accolades!!! Go on you Mighty Gunners and make us proud!!!

Posted by Henry Larry on 08/28/2009

True Eduardo went down quite easily, and the result of the game couldn't have been different, but dumpening of the morale of the Celtic players is a matter that can not be proved by any measure to base on as the reason he should be banned. We have seen great players like Ronaldo go down so easily and even attracked the sympathises of the powers that be. Eduardo should be forgiven. I guess after he managed to get away from a tackle from defender before that fall he wasn't strong enough to remain standing.

Posted by CBasse on 08/29/2009

I would say good show as usual put on by the Gunners they combined well together and showed exactly who they really were. What I can say about what Eduardo did to earn Arsenals first goal was really wrong there was no need for a dive there and that just isnt the right way you play the Beautiful game so heads up and I hope I dont see anything like that coming from the Gunners. It isnt for us. But enough on that awsome goals from Arshavin and Eboue I believe we Gunners can go all the way to Champions League Glory. Dont be fazed by the big names like Barcelona and Real Madrid who bagged in Cristiano Ronaldo. So Im saying WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS

Posted by Buchz on 08/29/2009

it's funny Eduardo is today on the other end of the controversy after he last had his foot "chopped off" by Taylor in the Birmingham game.

it's also funny how Arsene Wenger who is an advocate of video technology (he advocated the use of hawk eye technology used in tennis for goal line decisions) is now questioning the use of video technology used against Eduardo.

But of course that is just an isolated incident. I strongly believe what Wenger really wants is to cement his point of using video technology and make it available for all football matches.

will that ever happen? i do not know. there definitely is some progress and especially after this incident, the football governing bodies would be more pressured into giving into video technology.

how long will it take before more bad refereeing and players who get away scot free take place? this incident could in the end be playing into Wenger's hands when technology would finally be used.

Posted by ezzy on 08/29/2009

I think there has been too much noise about nothing regarding this matter. Celtic were alread resigned to the Europa League when they lost at home to Arsenal. Celtic knew that. Appears they were then bent on looking for an excuse for their fans for not progressing. After being well-beaten by a team in a higher echelon of football brilliance, why did they not just accept defeat galantly, and move on?

And why did UEFA charge Eduardo AFTER the complaints by the Celtic fans, players and SFA? Should they not proactively launch investigations and charge players accordingly, on their own? This smacks of a body that runs on the temperament of complainers.

Posted by julius on 08/29/2009

to me the player should not be the one to be sanction,instead his the referee in charge of the game.after all celtic would not have be able to bit arsenal come rain, come shine.htey are other player that did same and they are not sanctioned

Posted by otubanjo muyiwa joseph on 09/22/2009

up gunners !!!!!! i will always remain a gunner

Posted by Tony Brown on 09/24/2009

I don't know If I said it already but ...Great site...keep up the good work. :) I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I'm glad I found your blog. Thanks, :)

A definite great read..Tony Brown

Posted by edwin on 10/28/2009

AW needs last "15-20 mins GAME PLAN" especially when they are leading and one more stong analytical assistant to provide more good/live data to decide "who should out/in". Gunners are too young, they need mature midfielder in their last Qtr play. AW, please consider to add this kind of midfielder during Jan transfer window, it won't hurt you/AFC financially

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About
David Young Sam Limbert: My retirement as a football player came at the age of 14 due to being rubbish, it's fair to say I was more Kaba Diawara than Thierry Henry, so I turned my focus to writing about the game. I'm a lifelong Arsenal fan and have been lucky enough to watch the team across England and Europe. My favourite Gunner of all time is Dennis Bergkamp, and the 2004 Invincibles is the greatest side I've ever seen in English football. I try to be positive about the Arsenal as it's the hope that keeps us going! Follow me on twitter @SamsMatchReport.

RSS feed

Categories
Recent Posts
Archives